Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Changes in the morphology of the hyperemic blebs in eyes undergone trabeculectomy with mitomycin C after injection of triamcinolone acetonide during one-year follow-up

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To track changes in the morphology of hyperemic blebs in eyes undergone trabeculectomy with mitomycin C 0.02% (MMC) after triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injection.

Methods

A total of 30 eyes of 30 patients with localized or diffuse hyperemia after trabeculectomy with MMC were enrolled in this prospective interventional case series. Two milligrams of TA were injected at the site of maximal injection. Bleb morphology was graded using Indiana Bleb Appearance Grading Scale (IBAGS), and the Moorfields Bleb Grading System (MBGS) 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after injection. Failure was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) more than predefined target IOP for each eye, need for an additional surgical procedure, IOP less than 6 mmHg, and loss of Light Perception (LP) vision.

Results

A total of 27 patients completed a 1-year follow-up period and were included in the final analysis. The mean time interval from trabeculectomy to injection of TA was 5.98 ± 2.57 weeks. The bleb height and vascularity in the IBAGS system decreased significantly after the intervention (p < 0.05), with an increase in bleb extension (p = 0.006). Using MBGS, the bleb area did not change significantly following TA injection (p = 0.056) but its height and vascularity significantly decreased in both central and peripheral areas and the surrounding conjunctiva (p = 0.032). The development of a mature cataract was the only complication that could be attributed to TA injection.

Conclusion

Injection of TA in hyperemic failing blebs improves bleb morphology by decreasing vascularity and height while increasing the extent with an acceptable safety profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [SMT], upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Fan Gaskin JC, Nguyen DQ, Soon Ang G, O’Connor J, Crowston JG (2014) Wound healing modulation in glaucoma filtration surgery-conventional practices and new perspectives: the role of antifibrotic agents (Part I). J Curr Glaucoma Pract 8(2):37–45. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1159

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Komaroff E (2004) Factors for progression and glaucoma treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 15(2):102–106. https://doi.org/10.1097/00055735-200404000-00008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cvenkel B, Kopitar AN, Ihan A (2013) Correlation between filtering bleb morphology, expression of inflammatory marker HLA-DR by ocular surface, and outcome of trabeculectomy. J Glaucoma 22(1):15–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182254051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sacu S, Rainer G, Findl O, Georgopoulos M, Vass C (2003) Correlation between the early morphological appearance of filtering blebs and outcome of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. J Glaucoma 12(5):430–435. https://doi.org/10.1097/00061198-200310000-00006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Masoumpour MB, Nowroozzadeh MH, Razeghinejad MR (2016) Current and future techniques in wound healing modulation after glaucoma filtering surgeries. Open Ophthalmol J 10:68–85. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364101610010068

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lama PJ, Fechtner RD (2003) Antifibrotics and wound healing in glaucoma surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 48(3):314–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6257(03)00038-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Georgoulas S, Dahlmann-Noor A, Brocchini S, Khaw PT (2008) Modulation of wound healing during and after glaucoma surgery. Prog Brain Res 173:237–254. https://doi.org/10.1097/00055735-200004000-00010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Three-year follow-up of the Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study (1993) Jan Am J Ophthalmol 115(1): 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73529-9

  9. Seibold LK, Sherwood MB, Kahook MY (2012) Wound modulation after filtration surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 57(6):530–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.01.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Araujo SV, Spaeth GL, Roth SM, Starita RJ (1995) A ten-year follow-up on a prospective, randomized trial of postoperative corticosteroids after trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology 102(12):1753–1759. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30797-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shapiro MS, Thoft RA, Friend J, Parrish RK, Gressel MG (1985) 5-Fluorouracil toxicity to the ocular surface epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26(4):580–583

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenfield DS, Liebmann JM, Jee J, Ritch R (1998) Late-onset bleb leaks after glaucoma filtering surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 116(4):443–447. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.116.4.443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Soltau JB, Rothman RF, Budenz DL, Greenfield DS, Feuer W, Liebmann JM et al (2000) Risk factors for glaucoma filtering bleb infections. Arch Ophthalmol 118(3):338–342. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.118.3.338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cantor LB, Mantravadi A, WuDunn D, Swamynathan K, Cortes A (2003) Morphologic classification of filtering blebs after glaucoma filtration surgery: the Indiana Bleb Appearance Grading Scale. J Glaucoma 12(3):266–271. https://doi.org/10.1097/00061198-200306000-00015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wells AP, Ashraff NN, Hall RC, Purdie G (2006) Comparison of two clinical Bleb grading systems. Ophthalmology 113(1):77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.06.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng L, Arvind H, Wechsler D (2016) Outcomes: trabeculectomy bleb needle revision with 5-Fluorouracil. J Glaucoma 25(3):317–323. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shingleton BJ (1996) Management of the failing glaucoma filter. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 27(6):445–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Picht G, Grehn F (1998) Classification of filtering blebs in trabeculectomy: biomicroscopy and functionality. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 9(2):2–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00055735-199804000-00002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Clarke JCK, Minassian D, Khaw PT, Group MFSS (2005) The more flow surgery study: the effect of intraoperative 5FU on IOP control and trabeculectomy bleb appearance using the moorfields bleb grading system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46(13):1221

  20. SheridanCM, Unger WG, Ayliffe W, Alam Y, Goldsmith J, O’donoghue E et al (1996) Macrophages during fibrosis following scleral fistulising surgery in a rat model. Curr Eye Res 15(5):559–568. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713689609000767

  21. Chang L, Crowston JG, Cordeiro MF, Akbar AN, Khaw PT (2000) The role of the immune system in conjunctival wound healing after glaucoma surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 45(1):49–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6257(00)00135-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Broadway DC, Grierson I, Stürmer J, Hitchings RA (1996) Reversal of topical antiglaucoma medication effects on the conjunctiva. Arch Ophthalmol 114(3):262–267. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1996.01100130258004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baudouin C, Nordmann J-P, Denis P, Creuzot-Garcher C, Allaire C, Trinquand C (2002) Efficacy of indomethacin 0.1% and fluorometholone 0.1% on conjunctival inflammation following chronic application of antiglaucomatous drugs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240(11):929–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-002-0581-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yoon HM, Jee NC (1987) The effect of preoperative subconjunctival triamcinolone administration on glaucoma filtration. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 28(4):779–785. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1986.01050180072032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Seah SK, Husain R, Gazzard G, Lim MC, Hoh S-T, Oen FT et al (2005) Use of surodex in phacotrabeculectomy surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 139(5):927–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.10.052

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Borggrefe J, Lieb W, Grehn F (1999) A prospective randomized comparison of two techniques of combined cataract–glaucoma surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 237(11):887–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004170050381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Allan BD, Barrett GD (1993) Combined small incision phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 19(1):97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80292-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yuki K, Shiba D, Kimura I, Ohtake Y, Tsubota K (2009) Trabeculectomy with or without intraoperative sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in treating secondary glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 147(6):1055–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.01.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Bergen T, Van de Velde S, Vandewalle E, Moons L, Stalmans I (2014) Improving patient outcomes following glaucoma surgery: state of the art and future perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol Auckl NZ 8:857–867. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S48745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roth SM, Spaeth GL, Starita RJ, Birbillis EM, Steinmann WC (1991) The effects of postoperative corticosteroids on trabeculectomy and the clinical course of glaucoma: five-year follow-up study. Ophthalmic Surg 22(12):724–729

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Azuara-Blanco A, Spaeth GL, Augsburger JJ (1999) Oral prednisone in guarded filtration procedures supplemented with antimetabolites. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 30(2):126–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu D, Ahmet A, Ward L, Krishnamoorthy P, Mandelcorn ED, Leigh R et al (2013) A practical guide to the monitoring and management of the complications of systemic corticosteroid therapy. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 9(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1710-1492-9-30

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kalina PH, Erie JC, Rosenbaum L (1995) Biochemical quantification of triamcinolone in subconjunctival depots. Arch Ophthalmol 113(7):867–869. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1995.01100070041022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ideta S, Noda M, Kawamura R, Shinoda K, Inoue M, Tsubota K (2008) Ptosis after Sub–Tenon’s capsule triamcinolone. Ophthalmology 115(2):410–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.09.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dal Canto AJ, Downs-Kelly E, Perry JD (2005) Ptosis and orbital fat prolapse after posterior sub–Tenon’s capsule triamcinolone injection. Ophthalmology 112(6):1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.01.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Agrawal S, Agrawal J, Agrawal TP (2003) Conjunctival ulceration following triamcinolone injection. Am J Ophthalmol 136(3):539–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00320-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Moshfeghi DM, Lowder CY, Roth DB, Kaiser PK (2002) Retinal and choroidal vascular occlusion after posterior sub-tenon triamcinolone injection. Am J Ophthalmol 134(1):132–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01426-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gallardo MJ, Johnson DA (2004) Cutaneous hypopigmentation following a posterior sub-tenon triamcinolone injection. Am J Ophthalmol 137(4):779–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2003.09.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Renfro L, Snow JS (1992) Ocular effects of topical and systemic steroids. Dermatol Clin 10(3):505–512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Investigators A (Advanced GIS) (2001) The advanced glaucoma intervention study: 8. Risk of cataract formation after trabeculectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 119(12):1771. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.119.12.1771

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZV and GF designed the study. MF and SMT followed the patients and were active in data registration. SMT wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Mehdi Tabatabaei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Zakieh Vahedian declares that she has no conflict of interest. Ghasem Fakhraie declares that he has no conflict of interest. Marzye Faraji declares that she has no conflict of interest. Seyed Mehdi Tabatabaei declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

There is no identifying information about participants available in the article, so this issue is not applicable.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study which involve human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vahedian, Z., Fakhraie, G., Faraji, M. et al. Changes in the morphology of the hyperemic blebs in eyes undergone trabeculectomy with mitomycin C after injection of triamcinolone acetonide during one-year follow-up. Int Ophthalmol 41, 3549–3557 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01940-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01940-9

Keywords

Navigation