Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Minimising prescription errors—a quality improvement project in the ophthalmology department in a tertiary referral hospital

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this quality improvement project was to look into the hospital prescriptions and to identify and record the type and number of errors, to implement measures to reduce the risk of these errors and then to reaudit to assess the impact of changes implemented.

Methods

The initial audit was conducted prospectively over a eleven-week period. Prescriptions written by doctors of all grades and members of the staff, such as optometrists and nurses, were analysed. A glaucoma prescription guide along with more training at prescribing for doctors was introduced with a view to reducing these errors. A reaudit later demonstrated a significant reduction in these errors.

Results

After the introduction of a glaucoma prescription guide and more training for all grades of staff members, prescription errors reduced to 73/2342 (3.1%). Reaudit showed a reduction in both prescription writing errors 50/73(68.4%) and drug-related errors 23/73(31.6%).

Conclusion

Prescription errors are avoidable. This audit demonstrated that providing an accessible, easy to read and understand glaucoma prescription guide in the outpatient department along with targeted training for medical staff in prescribing can help in minimising these errors and can lead to safer practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jeffrey K (2009) Aronson. Medication errors: definitions and classification Br J Clin Pharmacol. 67(6):599–604

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cousins D, Crompton A, Gell J et al (2019) The top ten prescribing errors in practice and how to avoid them. The Pharmaceutical Journal. 302:7922

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donaldson L (2002) An organisation with a memory. Clin. Med. 2:452–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Utman SA, Atkinson PL, Baig HM. Methods to reduce prescription errors in ophthalmic medication. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct;27(4):267-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Sep 25. PMID: 24371422; PMCID: PMC3841255.

  5. Al-Khani S, Moharram A, Aljadhey H. Factors contributing to the identification and prevention of incorrect drug prescribing errors in outpatient setting. Saudi Pharm J. 2014 Nov;22(5):429-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 19. PMID: 25473331; PMCID: PMC4246412.

  6. GMC (2013) 'Good Medical Practice; Available at https://www.gmc-uk.org/Prescribing_guidance.pdf_59055247.pdf

  7. Mandal K, Fraser SG (2005) The incidence of prescribing errors in an eye hospital. BMC Ophthalmology. 5:4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ et al (1995) Systems analysis of adverse events. JAMA. 274:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.274.1.35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N et al (1995) Incidence of adverse events and potential adverse drug events: Implications for prevention. JAMA. 274:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.274.1.29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pekdemir M, Yanturali S, Karakus G (2005) More than just an ocular solution. Emerg Med J. 22:753–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Potter WS, Nelson LB, Raber IM (1990) Corneal graft rejection in a child and inadvertent substitution of Tobrex for Tobra Dex. Ophthalmic Surg. 21:671–2

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Holland R, Desborough J, Goodyear L, Hall S, Wright D, Loke YK (2007) Does pharmacist-led medication review help to reduce hospital admission and death in older people? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 65:303–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tulsi Changulani.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Changulani, T., Mustafa, M.Z., Ahuja, S. et al. Minimising prescription errors—a quality improvement project in the ophthalmology department in a tertiary referral hospital. Int Ophthalmol 41, 3041–3046 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01866-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01866-2

Keywords

Navigation