Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes of diffractive bifocal toric and trifocal toric intraocular lenses 12 months after implantation in patients with moderate to high myopia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of bifocal toric and trifocal toric intraocular lenses (IOL) in patients with moderate to high myopia at 12 months after implantation.

Method

This is a prospective and comparative study. In 120 eyes with moderate to high myopia and astigmatism, bifocal toric IOLs (n = 60 eyes) or trifocal toric IOLs (n = 60 eyes) were implanted. Eyes with axial lengths from 24.0 to 26.5 mm were included. Postoperative examinations measured near, intermediate, and distance visual acuity (VA), along with refractive measurements, binocular defocus curves, and patient satisfaction with the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.

Results

For uncorrected- and corrected distance intermediate VA, the trifocal group showed significantly better VA at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months than the bifocal group. Driving subscale scores from the questionnaire were significantly better in the trifocal than the bifocal group. Concerning the binocular defocus curve, uncorrected distance VA was significantly higher in the trifocal than bifocal group at test distances of -1.5 D.

Conclusions

Both trifocal and bifocal toric IOLs effectively corrected the near, intermediate, and distance vision in patients with moderate to high myopia and astigmatism. However, intermediate vision was significantly better in eyes with trifocal than bifocal toric IOLs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Code availability

Non-digital data supporting this study are stored by the corresponding author at the Lazer Eye Hospital.

References

  1. Hayashi K, Manabe S, Yoshida M, Hayashi H (2010) Effect of astigmatism on visual acuity in eyes with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(8):1323–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.02.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernandez-Vega L, Alfonso JF, Montes-Mico R, Amhaz H (2008) Visual acuity tolerance to residual refractive errors in patients with an apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 34(2):199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrer-Blasco T, Montes-Mico R, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Cervino A (2009) Prevalence of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 35(1):70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.09.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffmann PC, Hutz WW (2010) Analysis of biometry and prevalence data for corneal astigmatism in 23,239 eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(9):1479–1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.02.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Khan MI, Muhtaseb M (2011) Prevalence of corneal astigmatism in patients having routine cataract surgery at a teaching hospital in the United Kingdom. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(10):1751–1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mingo-Botin D, Munoz-Negrete FJ, Won Kim HR, Morcillo-Laiz R, Rebolleda G, Oblanca N (2010) Comparison of toric intraocular lenses and peripheral corneal relaxing incisions to treat astigmatism during cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(10):1700–1708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.04.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gangwani V, Hirnschall N, Findl O, Maurino V (2014) Multifocal toric intraocular lenses versus multifocal intraocular lenses combined with peripheral corneal relaxing incisions to correct moderate astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 40(10):1625–1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.01.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alio JL, Pinero DP, Plaza-Puche AB, Chan MJ (2011) Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(2):241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cillino S, Casuccio A, Di Pace F, Morreale R, Pillitteri F, Cillino G, Lodato G (2008) One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 115(9):1508–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vryghem JC, Heireman S (2013) Visual performance after the implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol 7:1957–1965. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s44415

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gundersen KG, Potvin R (2016) Comparison of visual outcomes and subjective visual quality after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of apodized diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 10:805–811. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s107162

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Vilar C, Hida WT, de Medeiros AL, Magalhaes KRP, de Moraes Tzelikis PF, Chaves M, Motta AFP, Carricondo PC, Alves MR, Nose W (2017) Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 11:1393–1397. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s139909

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaymak H, Breyer D, Alio JL, Cochener B (2017) Visual performance with bifocal and trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses: a prospective three-armed randomized multicenter clinical trial. J Refract Surg 33(10):655–662. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20170504-04

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith G (1991) Relation between spherical refractive error and visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 68(8):591–598. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199108000-00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sorsby A (1956) Emmetropia and its aberrations. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 76:167–169

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Toprak AB, Eser E, Guler C, Baser FE, Mayali H (2005) Cross-validation of the Turkish version of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25). Ophthalmic Epidemiol 12(4):259–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/09286580590967763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Pitts J, Gutierrez P, Berry S, Hays RD (1998) Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). NEI-VFQ Field Test Investig Arch Ophthalmol 116(11):1496–1504. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.116.11.1496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marques EF, Ferreira TB, Simoes P (2016) Visual performance and rotational stability of a multifocal toric intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 32(7):444–450. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20160502-01

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang JS, Chan VK, Ng JC, Law AK (2016) Visual performance after bilateral implantation of a four-haptic diffractive toric multifocal intraocular lens in high myopes. J Ophthalmol 2016:5320105. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5320105

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen X, Zhao M, Shi Y, Yang L, Lu Y, Huang Z (2016) Visual outcomes and optical quality after implantation of a diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens. Indian J Ophthalmol 64(4):285

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferreira TB, Marques EF, Rodrigues A, Montés-Micó R (2013) Visual and optical outcomes of a diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 39(7):1029–1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cochener B, Vryghem J, Rozot P, Lesieur G, Heireman S, Blanckaert JA, Van Acker E, Ghekiere S (2012) Visual and refractive outcomes after implantation of a fully diffractive trifocal lens. Clin Ophthalmol 6:1421–1427. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s32343

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Mojzis P, Pena-Garcia P, Liehneova I, Ziak P, Alio JL (2014) Outcomes of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 40(1):60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.06.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Law EM, Aggarwal RK, Kasaby H (2014) Clinical outcomes with a new trifocal intraocular lens. Eur J Ophthalmol 24(4):501–508. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sheppard AL, Shah S, Bhatt U, Bhogal G, Wolffsohn JS (2013) Visual outcomes and subjective experience after bilateral implantation of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 39(3):343–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.09.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mojzis P, Kukuckova L, Majerova K, Liehneova K, Pinero DP (2014) Comparative analysis of the visual performance after cataract surgery with implantation of a bifocal or trifocal diffractive IOL. J Refract Surg 30(10):666–672. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20140903-06

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gundersen KG, Potvin R (2016) Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol 10:455–461

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Gatinel D, Houbrechts Y (2013) Comparison of bifocal and trifocal diffractive and refractive intraocular lenses using an optical bench. J Cataract Refract Surg 39(7):1093–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Alfonso JF, Knorz M, Fernandez-Vega L, Rincón JL, Suarez E, Titke C, Kohnen T (2014) Clinical outcomes after bilateral implantation of an apodized 30 D toric diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 40(1):51–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cochener B, Vryghem J, Rozot P, Lesieur G, Chevalier JP, Henry JM, David T, Lesueur L, Gatinel D, Ganem C (2014) Clinical outcomes with a trifocal intraocular lens: a multicenter study. J Refract Surg 30(11):762–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.T. and M.G. contributed to the design and implementation of the research, to the analysis of the results and to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdulhakim Tekce.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tekce, A., Gulmez, M. Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes of diffractive bifocal toric and trifocal toric intraocular lenses 12 months after implantation in patients with moderate to high myopia. Int Ophthalmol 41, 3029–3040 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01865-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01865-3

Keywords

Navigation