Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate and compare outcomes of CO2 laser-assisted sclerectomy surgery (CLASS) with mitomycin C (MMC) combined with or without phacoemulsification in adult Asian glaucoma patients.
Design
Retrospective, comparative study.
Methods
Adult Asian glaucoma patients who underwent CLASS alone or combined with phacoemulsification using standardized surgery by two trained glaucoma surgeons between 2014 and 2016 were identified. The main measures of outcome were: intraocular pressure (IOP), use of supplemental medical therapy, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), microperforations, macroperforations, and repeated intervention(s) for glaucoma.
Results
Forty-one eyes who underwent CLASS alone (13 eyes) or combined with phacoemulsification (28 eyes) were included. Overall, BCVA improved from 0.28 ± 0.19 to 0.14 ± 0.17, and 0.17 ± 0.19, 0.22 ± 0.24, and 0.18 ± 0.23 at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Mean IOP dropped from 17.9 ± 4.7 mmHg to 14.6 ± 5.5, 13.9 ± 3.3, 14.3 ± 3.6, and 14.1 ± 3.7 mmHg, and average number of medications reduced from 2.9 ± 0.9 to 0.2 ± 0.6, 0.5 ± 0.9, 1.0 ± 1.2, and 1.3 ± 1.4 at the same time points. There was no statistically significant difference in BCVA, IOP, and medication reduction between the two groups.
Conclusions
CLASS combined with or without phacoemulsification was equally safe and effective, but yielded more modest results in our population.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Quigley HA, Broman AT (2006) The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 90(3):262–267. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.081224
Sarodia U, Shaarawy T, Barton K (2007) Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery: a critical evaluation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 18(2):152–158. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e328091c1ae
Greifner G, Roy S, Mermoud A (2016) Results of CO2 Laser-assisted Deep Sclerectomy as Compared With Conventional Deep Sclerectomy. J Glaucoma 25(7):e630–e638. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000187
Shaarawy T, Karlen M, Schnyder C et al (2001) Five-year results of deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. J Cataract Refract Surg 27(11):1770–1778. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01032-x
Cillino S, Di Pace F, Casuccio A et al (2004) Deep sclerectomy versus punch trabeculectomy with or without phacoemulsification: a randomized clinical trial. J Glaucoma 13(6):500–506. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ijg.0000137869.18156.81
Chiselita D (2001) Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma surgery. Eye (Lond) 15(Pt 2):197–201
Hondur A, Onol M, Hasanreisoglu B (2008) Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery: meta-analysis of recent results. J Glaucoma 17(2):139–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e31814b98f7
Geffen N, Ton Y, Degani J et al (2012) CO2 laser-assisted sclerectomy surgery, part II: multicenter clinical preliminary study. J Glaucoma 21(3):193–198. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181f7b14f
Skaat A, Goldenfeld M, Cotlear D et al (2014) CO2 laser-assisted deep sclerectomy in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 23(3):179–184. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182707406
Yick DW, Lee JW, Tsang S et al (2016) Preliminary results of CO2 laser-assisted sclerectomy surgery (CLASS) in the treatment of advanced glaucoma in a Chinese population. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(45):e5294. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005294
Geffen N, Mimouni M, Sherwood M et al (2016) Mid-term Clinical Results of CO2 Laser-assisted Sclerectomy Surgery (CLASS) for Open-Angle Glaucoma Treatment. J Glaucoma 25(12):946–951. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000437
Eldaly MA, Bunce C, Elsheikha OZ et al (2014) Non-penetrating filtration surgery versus trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007059.pub2
Tan YL, Tsou PF, Tan GS et al (2011) Postoperative complications after glaucoma surgery for primary angle-closure glaucoma vs primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 129(8):987–992. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.71
Husain R, Clarke JC, Seah SK et al (2005) A review of trabeculectomy in East Asian people–the influence of race. Eye (Lond) 19(3):243–252. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6701477
Investigators AGIS (2001) The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 9. Comparison of glaucoma outcomes in black and white patients within treatment groups. Am J Ophthalmol. 132(3):311–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01028-5
Yu X, Chen C, Sun M et al (2018) CO2 Laser-assisted Deep Sclerectomy Combined With Phacoemulsification in Patients With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma and Cataract. J Glaucoma 27(10):906–909. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001056
Lochhead J, Casson RJ, Salmon JF (2003) Long term effect on intraocular pressure of phacotrabeculectomy compared to trabeculectomy. Br J Ophthalmol 87(7):850–852. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.7.850
Choy BNK (2017) Comparison of surgical outcome of trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy in Chinese glaucoma patients. Int J Ophthalmol 10(12):1928–1930. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2017.12.23
Funding
The authors did not receive any funding, grant, or other support for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no financial interests or conflicts of interest in this manuscript.
Availability of data and material
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article (and/or) its supplementary materials.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ho, D.C.W., Perera, S.A., Hla, M.H. et al. Evaluating CO2 laser-assisted sclerectomy surgery with mitomycin C combined with or without phacoemulsification in adult Asian glaucoma subjects. Int Ophthalmol 41, 1445–1454 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01707-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01707-2