Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

National survey of intraoperative mitomycin C use during trabeculectomy surgery in the UK

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Mitomycin C is a routinely used antimetabolite which effectively limits the scarring process. Conventionally, the intra-operative technique of MMC delivery during trabeculectomy is the direct application of the soaked sponges. The aim of this study is to evaluate the current practice of delivering MMC during trabeculectomy and to see the practices related to a retained MMC swab during trabeculectomy in the UK.

Methods

An electronic questionnaire of 8 questions regarding the intraoperative use of MMC during trabeculectomy surgery was emailed to 69 ophthalmologist members of the UK and Eire glaucoma society (UKEGS) through email in July 2019.

Results

97.2% of the surveyed glaucoma surgeons said they use MMC during trabeculectomy routinely, while 2.9% said they never use MMC for trabeculectomy. In reply to a question ‘Have you ever had a retained MMC-soaked sponge/fragment of sponge’, 11.76% replied ‘yes’, 88.24% said ‘No’. In response to what technique was employed at the time of retained MMC sponges, all the respondents said they had employed the same technique of ‘multiple individual sponges’. 47.1% surgeons said they use multiple individual sponges on being asked what technique they currently employ for delivering MMC during trabeculectomy surgery, while 14.7% surgeons use multiple sponges linked with a ‘necklace suture’ and 5.9% inject MMC.

Conclusion

Our survey suggests the intra-operative MMC use in the UK is high and that unintentional MMC-soaked swab retention does occur, albeit rarely. A preference of using the MMC-soaked swabs as a delivery method of MMC is seen in our survey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Cairns JE (1968) Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol 66:673–679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fontana H, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Lumba J, Ralli M, Caprioli J (2006) Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C: outcomes and risk factors for failure in phakic open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 113:930–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh K (1997) Antimetabolite application: science or voodoo? J Glaucoma 6:271–273

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen CW (1983) Enhanced intraocular pressure controlling effectiveness of trabeculectomy by local application of mitomycin C. Trans Asia-Pacific Acad Ophthalmol 9:172–177

    Google Scholar 

  5. Falck FY Jr, Skuta GL et al (1992) Mitomycin vs 5-fluoruracil anti-metabolite therapy for glaucoma filtration surgery. Semin Ophthalmol 7:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sisto D, Vetrugno M et al (2007) The role of antimetabolites in filtration surgery for neovascular glaucoma: intermediate-term follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85(3):267–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Edmunds B, Thompson J, Salmon J et al (2001) The National Survey of Trabeculectomy. II. Variations in operative technique and outcome. Eye 15:441–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Siriwardena D, Edmunds B, Wormald RPL et al (2004) National survey of antimetabolite use in glaucoma surgery in the United Kingdom. Br J Ophthalmol 88:873–876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Agarwal HC, Saigal D, Sihota R (2001) Assessing the role of subconjunctival versus intrascleral application of mitomycin-C in high-risk trabeculectomies. Indian J Ophthalmol 49(2):91–95

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tressler CS, Cyrlin MN, Rosenshein JS, Fazio R (1996) Subconjunctival versus intrascleral mitomycin-C in trabeculectomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 27:661–666

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Singh J, O’Brien C, Chawla HB (1995) Success rate and complications of intraoperative 0.2 mg/ml mitomycin C in trabeculectomy surgery. Eye (Lond). 9(Pt 4):460–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Choudhary S, Sen S, Gupta O (2018) An unusual case of post trabeculectomy conjunctival granuloma. Oman J Ophthalmol 11:52–54

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Khamar M, Bhojwani D, Patel P, Vasavada A (2019) Leftover mitomycin-c sponge causing blebitis. Indian J Ophthalmol 67(10):1753–1755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Shahwan S, Edward DP (2005) Foreign body granulomas secondary to retained sponge fragment following mitomycin C trabeculectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243(2):178–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shin DH, Tsai CS, Kupin TH, Olivier MM (1994) Retained cellulose sponge after trabeculectomy with adjunctive subconjunctival mitomycin C. Am J Ophthalmol 118:111–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Laura L (2012) "Surgeons Make Thousands of Snafus", Wall Street J, p A2, retrieved 12 October 2013

  17. Improvement.nhs.uk. 2020. Revised Never Events Policy And Framework | NHS Improvement. [online] Available at: https://improvement.nhs.uk/resources/never-events-policy-and-framework/

  18. Urbaneja D, Morilla-Grasa A, Jimenez E et al (2016) In vitro mitomycin C absorption and delivery with different sponge materials used in filtering surgery. Clin Ophthalmol 10:665–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Poole TR, Gillespie IH, Knee G, Whitworth J (2002) Microscopic fragmentation of ophthalmic surgical sponge spears used for delivery of antiproliferative agents in glaucoma filtering surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 86(12):1448–1449. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.12.1448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindfield D, Jutley G, Griffiths M (2010) Trabeculectomy pearls of wisdom; mitomycin-soaked pledget ‘necklace’ suture. Eye 24:1307–1308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Melo AB, Spaeth GL (2010) A new, safer method of applying antimetabolites during glaucoma filtering surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 41(3):383–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maheshwari D, Kanduri S, Rengappa R, Kadar MA (2020) Intraoperative injection versus sponge-applied mitomycin C during trabeculectomy: One-year study. Indian J Ophthalmol 68(4):615–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Khouri AS, Huang G, Huang LY (2017) Intraoperative Injection versus Sponge-applied Mitomycin C during Trabeculectomy: one-year study. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 11(3):101–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guimarães MEV et al (2019) Glaucoma surgery with soaked sponges with mitomycin c vs sub-tenon injection: Short-term outcomes. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 13(2):50–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Esfandiari H et al (2018) Treatment outcomes of mitomycin C-augmented trabeculectomy, sub-tenon injection versus soaked sponges, after 3 years of follow-up. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 1(1):66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Authors did not receive any funding for this survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SAK was involved in concept, design, write-up and approval of the final manuscript draft. KW was involved in idea, concept, design and write-up approval of the final manuscript draft. MAR was involved in design, manuscript drafting and approval of the final manuscript draft. URA was involved in design, data analysis, manuscript drafting and approval of the final manuscript draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaheryar Ahmed Khan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors and therefore does not require an ethical committee approval.

Informed consent

Informed consent obtained from all the participants of this survey study.

Animal Research

Not applicable as no animals were involved.

Consent to participate

Informed consent obtained from the participants.

Clinical Trials Registration

Not applicable as this study was a surgeon survey and not a clinical trial.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

  1. 1.

    How often do you use mitomycin C (MMC) in a trabeculectomy surgery?

i

Never

ii

Less than 25% cases

iii

Between 25–50% cases

Iv

More than half of the cases

If you have answered “Never”, then please DO NOT answer any other questions and click Finish Survey at the bottom of the page. In case of any other answers please continue to question 2 below:

  1. 2.

    Have you ever had a retained MMC-soaked sponge/fragment of sponge?

If you select "yes" please answer all remaining questions.

If you select "no" please go to question 6.

Y

N

  1. 3.

    What technique did you employ at the time?

Multiple individual sponges

Corneal light-shield cut in half/quarter

Multiple sponges linked with a ‘necklace’ suture

Others (please specify):

  1. 4.

    What sponge material did you use at the time?

Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)

Methylcellulose

Absorbable gelatine sponges(AGS)

Other (please specify):

  1. 5.

    What size of sponge material did you use at the time?

1 × 1 mm

2 × 1 mm

3 × 1 mm

Others: (please specify)

  1. 6.

    What technique do you currently employ?

Multiple individual sponges

Corneal light-shield cut in half/quarter

Multiple sponges linked with a ‘necklace’ suture

Inject MMC subconjunctivally instead of using sponges

Other: (please specify if technique not described above)

  1. 7.

    What sponge material do you currently employ?

PVA

Methylcellulose

AGS

Other: (please specify)

  1. 8.

    What sponge size do you currently employ?

1 × 1 mm

2 × 1 mm

3 × 1 mm

Other: (please specify)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, S.A., Whittaker, K., Razzaq, M.A. et al. National survey of intraoperative mitomycin C use during trabeculectomy surgery in the UK. Int Ophthalmol 41, 1309–1316 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01688-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01688-8

Keywords

Navigation