Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical, radiographic, and intraoperative risk factors for retinal detachment after open globe injury

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Retinal detachment (RD) is a vision-threatening complication of open globe injuries (OGI). This study sought to assess clinical, radiographic, and intraoperative risk factors for RD after OGI. A secondary goal was to test the retinal detachment after open globe injury (RD-OGI) score.

Methods

Records of patients undergoing OGI repair at a single trauma center over 3 years were reviewed using a retrospective case series design. Eyes that were enucleated or lost to follow up within 30 days of OGI without evidence of RD were excluded. Potential risk factors for RD development were assessed by logistic regression or chi-square tests were appropriate and were entered into a multivariate logistic regression if significant on univariate analysis. Risk of RD for each eye was categorized by its RD-OGI score.

Results

Seventy-three eyes (72 patients) were included. In univariate analysis, afferent pupillary defect, worse visual acuity, posterior injury, vitreous hemorrhage, and posterior segment volume loss (PSVL) on CT were strong predictors of RD. In multivariate analysis, only PSVL on CT (adjusted OR 10.8, P = 0.025) maintained a statistically significant association with RD risk. At 1 year, 5% of low-risk eyes, 20% of moderate-risk eyes, and 67% of high-risk eyes developed RD. These rates were not significantly different from the RD-OGI derivation or validation cohorts (P = 0.90 and P = 0.67, respectively).

Conclusion

PSVL on CT increases the risk of RD after OGI. The RD-OGI Score was a good prognostic tool for assessing RD risk after OGI in this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

De-identified patient data were contained in a single spreadsheet, which is available from any author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Négrel A, Thylefors B (1998) The global impact of eye injuries. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 5:143–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pieramici DJ, Sternberg P Jr et al (1997) A system for classifying mechanical injuries of the eye (globe). Am J Ophthalmol 123(6):820–831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuhn F, Maisiak R, Mann L, Mester V, Morris R, Witherspoon CD (2002) The Ocular Trauma Score (OTS). Ophthalmol Clin North Am 15(2):163–vi. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-1549(02)00007-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kono Kono JO, Maier M, Schmidt T (2001) Clinical predictors of retinal detachment after open globe injury. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 218:553–556. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-17137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin H, Lema GM, Yoganathan P (2016) Prognostic indicators of visual acuity after open globe injury and retinal detachment repair. Retina 36(4):750–757. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stryjewski TP, Andreoli CM, Eliott D (2014) Retinal detachment after open globe injury. Ophthalmol 121(1):327–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.06.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brodowska K, Stryjewski TP, Papavasileiou E et al (2017) Validation of the retinal detachment after open globe injury (RD-OGI) score as an effective tool for predicting retinal detachment. Ophthalmol 124(5):674–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schulze-Bonsel K, Feltgen N, Burau H et al (2006) Visual acuities “hand motion” and “count fingers” can be quantified with the Freiburg visual acuity test. Invest Vis Sci Ophthalmol 47:1236–1240. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cardillo JA, Stout JT, LaBree L et al (1997) Post-traumatic proliferative vitreoretinopathy: the epidemiologic profile, onset, risk factors, and visual outcome. Ophthalmol 104:1166–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30167-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Feng K, Hu Y, Wang C et al (2013) Risk factors, anatomical, and visual outcomes of injured eyes with proliferative vitreoretinopathy: eye injury vitrectomy study. Retina 33(8):1512–1518. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182852469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cleary PE, McInckler DS, Ryan SJ (1980) Ultrastructure of traction retinal detachment in rhesus monkey eyes after a posterior penetrating injury. Am J Ophthalmol 90(6):829–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)75198-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cleary PE, Ryan SJ (1979) Histology of wound, vitreous, and retina in experimental posterior penetrating eye injury in the rhesus monkey. Am J Ophthalmol 88(2):221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(79)90469-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hui YN, Goodnight R, Sorgente N et al (1989) Fibrovascular proliferation and retinal detachment after intravitreal injection of activated macrophages in the rabbit eye. Am J Ophthalmol 108(2):176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(89)90014-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Entezari M, Rabei HM, Badalabadi MM et al (2006) Visual outcome and ocular survival in open-globe injuries. Injury 37:633–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.02.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lesniak SP, Bauza A, Son JH et al (2011) Twelve-year review of pediatric traumatic open globe injuries in an urban U.S. population. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 49:73–79. https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20110712-02

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dunkin JM, Crum AV, Swanger RS, Bokhari SA (2011) Globe trauma. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 32:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2010.09.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Arey ML, Mootha VV, Whittemore AR et al (2007) Computed tomography in the diagnosis of occult open-globe injuries. Ophthalmol 114(8):1448–1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yuan WH, Hsu HC, Cheng HC et al (2014) CT of globe rupture: analysis and frequency of findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202(5):1100–1107. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Joseph DP, Pieramici DJ, Beauchamp NJ (2000) Computed tomography in the diagnosis and prognosis of open-globe injuries. Ophthalmol 107(10):1899–1906. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00335-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bodanapally UK, Addis H, Dreizin D et al (2017) Prognostic predictors of visual outcome in open globe injury: Emphasis on facial CT findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38(5):1013–1018. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare no outside sources of funding for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and initial data collection were performed by Travis Bales. Analysis was performed by Harpal S. Sandhu, MD. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Travis Bales with substantial contribution and revision by Harpal S. Sandhu, MD. Additional data collection and subsequent manuscript revision was performed by Tyler Ogden. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harpal S. Sandhu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Research ethics and patient consent

In this retrospective study, care was taken to protect the identities of human subjects. Patient names were substituted with a numerical code. De-identified patient data were contained in a single spreadsheet. The study was approved by the University of Louisville Institutional Review Board (Study ID# 19.0068) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). An informed consent waiver was approved by the IRB in accordance with United States Code of Federal Regulations [45 CFR 46.116 (d)].

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bales, T., Ogden, T. & Sandhu, H.S. Clinical, radiographic, and intraoperative risk factors for retinal detachment after open globe injury. Int Ophthalmol 41, 815–823 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01635-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01635-7

Keywords

Navigation