Abstract
Purpose
To identify predictive response optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings in uveitic macular edema (UME) treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX).
Methods
Retrospective study of 66 eyes (53 patients) treated with DEX for UME. SD-OCT macular scans were collected prior to DEX treatment and 6 weeks and 3 months after the DEX implant. OCT images were evaluated for qualitative and quantitative characteristics (central retinal thickness, CRT and macular volume, MV). A multivariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was carried out to study the predictive influence of OCT and clinical covariates on outcomes. The main outcome was a composite endpoint based on the simultaneous gain of 5 or more letters associated with a 20% or more reduction in CRT.
Results
A significant improvement in BCVA at 6 weeks (mean change from baseline −0.2, SD 0.3) and 3 months (mean −0.2, SD 0.4) was observed after the DEX implant. A significant decrease in CRT (change from baseline −187.7 μm at 3 months) and MV (change from baseline −1.7 mm3 at 3 months) were also observed. An association of ≥ 5-letter improvement in BCVA and a ≥ 20% CRT reduction was observed in 44.6% of cases at 6 weeks and 31.4% at 3 months. ANCOVA multivariate analyses found CRT at 3 months independent from baseline clinical variables but from CRT.
Conclusion
DEX implant is an effective treatment for UME independently of basal characteristics, producing both a gain of visual acuity and improvement of macular anatomy by OCT measures at 3 months.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Accorinti M, Okada AA, Smith JR, Gilardi M (2019) Epidemiology of macular edema in uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 27(2):169–180
Adán A, Moll-Udina A, Alba-Linero C, Figueroa-Vercellino JP, Llorenç V (2019) Recent progress in the treatment of uveitic macular edema. Expert Rev Ophthalmol, pp 1–10.
Fardeau C, Champion E, Massamba N, Lehoang P (2016) Uveitic macular edema. September 2015, pp 1–16.
Bansal P, Agarwal A, Gupta V, Singh R, Gupta A (2015) Spectral domain optical coherence tomography changes following intravitreal dexamethasone implant, Ozurdex ® in patients with uveitic cystoid macular edema. Indian J Ophthalmol 63(5):416–422
Matas J et al (2019) Predictors for functional and anatomic outcomes in macular edema secondary to non-infectious uveitis. PLoS One 14(1).
Coscas G, Cunha-Vaz J, Soubrane G (2017) Macular edema: definition and basic concepts. Dev Ophthalmol 58:1–10
Denniston AK, Keane PA, Srivastava SK (2017) Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in uveitis: the impact of quantitative imaging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 58(6): BIO131–BIO140.
Agrawal R, Arora R, Keane PA, Agarwal A, Pavesio C (2018) Morphometric features on enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography scans in idiopathic posterior uveitis or panuveitis. Int Ophthalmol 38(3):993–1002.
Markomichelakis NN et al (2004) Patterns of macular edema in patients with uveitis: qualitative and quantitative assessment using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 111(5):946–953
Berasategui B et al (2018) Behavior of hyperreflective foci in non-infectious uveitic macular edema, a 12-month follow-up prospective study. BMC Ophthalmol 18(1)
Zur D et al (2018) OCT biomarkers as functional outcome predictors in diabetic macular edema treated with dexamethasone implant. Ophthalmology 125(2):267–275
Thorne JE et al (2019) Periocular triamcinolone vs. intravitreal triamcinolone vs. intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of uveitic macular edema: the periOcular vs. INTravitreal corticosteroids for uveitic macular edema (POINT) trial. Ophthalmology 126(2):283–295
Lowder C et al (2011) Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for noninfectious intermediate or posterior uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol 129(5):545–553
Jaffe GJ, Foster CS, Pavesio CE, Paggiarino DA, Riedel GE (2019) Effect of an injectable fluocinolone acetonide insert on recurrence rates in chronic noninfectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment: twelve-month results. Ophthalmology 126(4):601–610
Suhler EB et al (2018) Safety and efficacy of Adalimumab in patients with noninfectious uveitis in an ongoing open-label study: VISUAL III. Ophthalmology 125(7):1075–1087
Alba-Linero C, Sala-Puigdollers A, Romero B, Llorenç V, Adan A, Zarranz-Ventura J (2019) Long-term intravitreal dexamethasone implant outcomes in uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm.
Cabrera M, Yeh S, Albini TA (2014) Sustained-release corticosteroid options. J Ophthalmol.
Karti O, Saatci AO (2018) Intravitreal dexamethasone implant in the treatment of non-infectious uveitic macular edema. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol J 7(4): 169–175.
Ratra D, Barh A, Banerjee M, Ratra V, Biswas J (2018) Safety and efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for refractory uveitic macular edema in adults and children. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 26(7):1034–1040
Zarranz-Ventura J et al (2014) Multicenter study of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in noninfectious uveitis: indications, outcomes, and reinjection frequency. Am J Ophthalmol 158(6):1136-1145.e5
Jabs DA et al (2005) Standardization of uveitis nomenclature for reporting clinical data. Results of the first international workshop. Am J Ophthalmol 140(3):509–516
Nussenblatt RB, Palestine AG, Chan CC, Roberge F (1985) Standardizatlon of vitreal inflammatory activity in intermediate and posterior uveitis. Ophthalmology 92(4):467–471
Lehpamer B, Moshier E, Goldberg N, Ackert J, Godbold J, Jabs DA (2013) Subretinal fluid in uveitic macular edema: effect on vision and response to therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 155(1):143–149
Otani T, Yamaguchi Y, Kishi S (2010) Correlation between visual acuity and foveal microstructural changes in diabetic macular edema. Retina 30(5):774–780
Shin HJ, Chung H, Kim HC (2011) Association between integrity of foveal photoreceptor layer and visual outcome in retinal vein occlusion. Acta Ophthalmol 89(1):35–40
Ota M et al (2008) Integrity of foveal photoreceptor layer in central retinal vein occlusion. Retina 28(10):1502–1508.
Fonollosa A et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implants in the management of macular edema secondary to infectious uveitis. Retina 36(9):1778–1785
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.M.-U conception of the paper, design of the paper, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript drafting, and literature search. M.F.-R. co-writing of the manuscript, data analysis and interpretation, design of the paper, manuscript editing and revision, as well as final approval. J.O. data collection, literature search, manuscript editing and final approval. A.S.-P., C.A.-L., V.L. and A.. manuscript editing, revision and final approval. C.E. statistics of the manuscript and final approval.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Availability of data and material
Availability on request to corresponding author.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moll-Udina, A., Figueras-Roca, M., Oliveres, J. et al. Uveitic macular edema response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant is independent of optical coherence tomography findings. Int Ophthalmol 41, 787–796 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01631-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01631-x