Skip to main content

Comparison of vessel density in macular and peripapillary regions between primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma using OCTA

International Ophthalmology volume 41, pages 173–184 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of our study was to compare macular and peripapillary vessel density using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) between eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG).

Methods

Thirty-six POAG and 34 PXG eyes with similar visual field defect (no statistically significant difference between average mean deviation and pattern standard deviation scores) were included. Macular superficial vessel density (msVD) in the superficial macular layer and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) parameters were assessed with (6 × 6 mm) and peripapillary vessel density (ppVD) in the radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) with (4.5 × 4.5 mm) OCTA scans. Area under the receiver operating curve was used for assessing diagnostic capability.

Results

In PXG group, all msVD parameters had lesser values, and especially in parafoveal region, statistically significant decrease was shown (p = 0.008) in all subdivisions except nasal (p = 0.053). FAZ area was more larger in PXG [0.32(0.25–0.36)] than POAG [0.28(0.22–0.39)],(p = 0.944). FAZ density − 300 μm had statistically significant decrease in PXG (47.22 ± 6.92) according to POAG groups (50.63 ± 7.25) (p = 0.048). Most of RPC VD parameters had decreasing values in PXG group (p > 0.05). VDs and corresponding thicknesses had significant remarkable positive correlation in both macular and peripapillary regions. Significant remarkable negative correlations were observed between fovea VD and FAZ area, FAZ perimeter and between fovea thickness and FAZ area, FAZ perimeter.

Conclusion

PXG eyes were found to have lesser values in terms of VD in the macular area, especially in the parafoveal and FD-300 regions, compared to POAG eyes which had similar functional and structural glaucomatous damage. Patients whose etiology was PXG and who seemed to have the same functional damage as those with POAG were actually found to have greater macular vascular damage. In addition, it was observed that macular vascular parameters correlated with peripapillary vascular parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Tobe LA, Harris A, Hussain RM et al (2015) The role of retrobulbar and retinal circulation on optic nerve head and retinal nerve fibre layer structure in patients with open-angle glaucoma over an 18-month period. Br J Ophthalmol 99:609–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ritch R, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U (2001) Exfoliation syndrome. Surv Ophthalmol 45:265–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ritch R (2016) Systemic associations of exfoliation syndrome. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol 5:45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. HelbigSchlötzer-Schrehardt HU, Noske W et al (1994) Anteriorchamber hypoxia and iris vasculopathy in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Ger J Ophthalmol 3:148–215

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yuksel N, Vl K, Demirci A et al (2001) Comparison of blood flow velocities of the extraocular vessels in patients with pseudoexfoliation or primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmologica 215:424–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rechtman E, Harris A, Kumar R et al (2003) An update on retinal circulation assessment technologies. Curr Eye Res 27:329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chansangpetch S, Lin SC (2018) Optical coherence tomography angiography in glaucoma care. Curr Eye Res 43:1067–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Takusagawa HL, Liu L, Ma KN et al (2017) Projection-resolved optical coherence tomography angiography of macular retinal circulation in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 124:1589–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yarmohammadi A, Zangwill LM, Diniz-Filho A et al (2017) Peripapillary and macular vessel density in patients with glaucoma and single-hemifield visual field defect. Ophthalmology 124:709–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Triolo G, Rabiolo A, Shemonski ND, Fard A, Di Matteo F, Sacconi R, Bettin P, Magazzeni S, Querques G, Vazquez LE et al (2017) Optical coherence tomography angiography macular and peripapillary vessel perfusion density in healthy subjects, glaucoma suspects, and glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 58:5713–5722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Geyman LS, Garg RA, Suwan Y et al (2017) Peripapillary perfused capillary density in primary open-angle glaucoma across disease stage: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Br J Ophthalmol 101:1261–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kwon J, Choi J, Shin JW et al (2017) Alterations of the foveal avascular zone measured by optical coherence tomography angiography in glaucoma patients with central visual field defects. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci 58:1637–1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Suwan Y, Geyman LS, Fard MA et al (2018) Peripapillary perfused capillary density in exfoliation syndrome and exfoliation glaucoma vs POAG and healthy controls: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol 7:84–89

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rebolleda G, Pérez-Sarriegui A, De Juan V, Ortiz-Toquero S, Muñoz-Negrete FJ (2019) A comparison of two optical coherence tomography–angiography devices in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma versus primary open-angle glaucoma and healthy subjects. Eur J Ophthalmol 29:636–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Philip S, Najafi A, Tantraworasin A, Chui TYP, Rosen RB, Ritch R (2019) Macula vessel density and foveal avascular zone parameters in exfoliation glaucoma compared to primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 60:1244–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lommatzsch C, Rothaus K, Koch JM, Heinz C, Grisanti S (2019) Vessel density in glaucoma of different entities as measured with optical coherence tomography angiography. Clin Ophthalmol 13:2527–2534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sample PA, Girkin CA, Zangwill LM et al (2009) The African descent and glaucoma evaluation study (adages): design and baseline data. Arch Ophthalmol 127(9):1136–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gillespie BW, Musch DC, Guire KE, Mills RP, Lichter PR, Janz NK, Wren PA (2003) On behalf of the CIGTS (Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study) Study Group. The collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study: baseline visual field and test-retest variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:2613–2620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang W, He M, Zhou M et al (2014) Ocular pseudoexfoliation syndrome and vascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9:e92767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meyer E, Haim T, Zonis S et al (1984) Pseudoexfoliation: epidemiology, clinical and scanning electron microscopic study. Ophthalmologica 188:141–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hammer T, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Naumann GO (2001) Unilateral or asymmetric pseudoexfoliation syndrome? An ultrastructual study. Arch Ophthalmol 119:1023–1031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu P, Xiao H, Liang C, Xu Y, Ye D, Huang J (2019) Quantitative analysis of microvasculature in macular and peripapillary regions in early primary open-angle glaucoma. Curr Eye Res 14:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  23. Park JH, Yoo C, Girard MJA, Mari JM, Kim YY (2018) Peripapillary vessel density in glaucomatous eyes: comparison between pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 27(11):1009–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mase T, Ishibazawa A, Nagaoka T et al (2016) Radial peripapillary capillary network visualized using wide-field montage optical coherence tomography angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57:504–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mansoori T, Sivaswamy J, Gamalapati JS et al (2017) Measurement of radial peripapillary capillary density in the normal human retina using optical coherence tomography angiography. J Glaucoma 26:241–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Campbell JP, Zhang M, Hwang TS et al (2017) Detailed vascular anatomy of the human retina by projection-resolved optical coherence tomography angiography. Sci Rep 7:42201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shoji T, Zangwill LM, Akagi T et al (2017) Progressive macula vessel density loss in primary open-angle glaucoma: a longitudinal study. Am J Ophthalmol 182:107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hou H, Moghimi S, Proudfoot JA, Ghahari E, Penteado RC, Bowd C, Yang D, Weinreb RN (2020) Ganglion cell complex thickness and macular vessel density loss in primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology S0161–6420(20):30014–30022

    Google Scholar 

  29. Penteado RC, Bowd C, Proudfoot J, Moghimi S, Manalastas PIC, Ghahari E, Hou H, Shoji T, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN (2020) Diagnostic ability of optical coherence tomography angiography macula vessel density for the diagnosis of glaucoma using difference scan sizes. J Glaucoma. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Faculty Department of Ophthalmology, Kocaeli University, Gazanfer Bilge Bulvarı Akçakent 2 Sitesi C4/15, İzmit, Kocaeli, Turkey

    Sevgi Subasi, Nursen Yuksel, Ece Basaran & Dilara Pirhan

Authors
  1. Sevgi Subasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nursen Yuksel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ece Basaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dilara Pirhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sevgi Subasi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Subasi, S., Yuksel, N., Basaran, E. et al. Comparison of vessel density in macular and peripapillary regions between primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma using OCTA. Int Ophthalmol 41, 173–184 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01564-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01564-5

Keywords

  • Optical coherence tomography angiography
  • Primary open-angle glaucoma
  • Pseudoexfoliation glaucoma
  • Visual field defect