Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A meta-analysis of the rate and related factors of glaucomatous optic nerve damage in patients with Glaucomatocyclitic Crisis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 10 May 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

To systematic analysis of domestic and foreign literature on the incidence and related factors of glaucomatous optic nerve damage (GOND) in patients with Glaucomatocyclitic Crisis (PSS).

Methods

A computerized literature search was carried out in PubMed database, Wanfang Medical Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure to collected domestic and foreign research studies on the incidence and related factors of glaucomatous optic nerve damage of Glaucomatocyclitic Crisis. Using Stata 15.1 software, select the indicators: incidence, gender, age, single/double eyes, duration of disease, and intraocular pressure (IOP) at onset for meta-analysis. OR (odds risk) was used as the effect variable for the binary variables, and mean difference was used as the effect variable for the continuous variables. The results are expressed by each effect amount and its 95% Confidence interval (CI). If there was heterogeneity among the original studies, a random effects model was used; otherwise, a fixed effects model was used.

Results

A total of 13 studies were included. The incidence of GOND in PSS was 0.251 (95%CI: 0.175–0.327). Three studies include the relevant factor analysis and the results showed: there was a statistically significant difference in age, and duration of disease in PSS patients with/without GOND (p = 0.000, p = 0.000), there was no statistical difference between the two groups in gender, single /double eyes, and IOP at onset (p = 0.468, 0.053, 0.065).

Conclusion

Glaucomatocyclitic Crisis can cause glaucomatous optic nerve damage. GOND is more likely to occur in patients who are older, and have a long course of the disease. For such patients, special attention should be paid to the detailed examination of visual function and follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Posner A, Schlossman A (1948) Syndrome of unilateral recurrent attacks of glaucoma with cyclitic symptoms. Arch Ophthalmol 39:517–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Li Z, Zuan X, Chen S et al (1982) Long-term follow-up observation of Glaucomatocyclitic Crisis syndrome. Chin J Ophthalmol 18:306–308

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lu D, Yan R (1982) Analysis of 177 cases of Glaucomatocyclitic Crisis syndrome. Chin J Ophthalmol 18:34–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kris M, Becher B, Knlker AE (1973) Glaucomatocyclitic crisis syndrome and primary open angle glaucoma. A J Ophthalmol 75:673–688

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jap A, Sivakumar M, Chee SP (2001) Is Passer-Schlossman syndrome benign? Ophthalmology 108:913–918

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maruyama K (2017) Characteristics of cases needing advanced treatment for intractable Posner-Schlossman syndrome. BMC Ophthalmol 17(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0438-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu Z, Zheng R (2012) The clinical analysis of Glaucomatocyclitic Crisis syndrome. Chin J Pract Ophthalmol 30(8):998–1000

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou H, Du Y, Song Y (2002) Related factors of visual field damage in glaucomatocyclitic crisis syndrome. Chin J Pract Ophthalmol 20(10):768–769

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang H, Ma Z (2017) Analysis of factors related to visual field damage in Posner-Schlossman syndrome. Chin J Chin Ophthalmol 27(5):325–327

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gu S, Liu D, Li J (2018) Curative effect observation of Posner-Schlossman syndrome. J Mil Surg Southwest China 20(2):134–137

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fu P, Hong H (2004) Heterochromic iris as a risk factor for the damage of optic nerve in Posner Schlossman syndrome. Chin J Pract Ophthalmol 22(3):193–195. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2004.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luo Q, Cheng Y, Yang Y (2009) Clinical analysis of Posner–Schlossman's syndrome on 32 cases. Int Eye Sci 9(7):1292–1293

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sun L, Guo Z, Li N (2017) Clinical analysis of Posner–Schlossman's syndrome. Women's Health Res 16:93–94

    Google Scholar 

  14. Qiao J (2015) Clinical analysis of Glaucomatocyclitic syndrome. Chin Health Stand Manag 6:156–157

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tang Y (2010) Clinical analysis of damage of visual field with Posner Schlossman's syndrome. Int Eye Sci 10(6):1204–1205

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xu X, Sun J (2014) Clinical analysis of glaucoma cyclitis syndrome. Jilin Med J 35(1):50–53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang S, Yin J, Xue C (2005) Clinical analysis of 48 cases of glaucoma cyclitis syndrome. Jiangsu Med J 31(3):215–216

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tran VT, Auer C, Guex Crosier Y et al (1994) Epidemiological characteristics of uveitis in Switzerland. Int Ophthalmol 18(5):293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paivonsalo-Hietanen T, Tuominen J, Vaahtoranta-Lehtonen H et al (1997) Incidence and prevalence of different uveitis entities in Finland. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 75(1):76–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bro T, Tallstdet L (2020) Epidemiology of uveitis in a region of southern Sweden. Acta Ophthalmol 98(1):32–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shirahama S, Kaburaki T, Nakahara H et al (2018) Epidemiology of uveitis (2013–2015) and changes in the patterns of uveitis (2004–2015) in the central Tokyo area: a retrospective study. BMC Ophthalmol 18(1):189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sia KJ, Jansen A, Waduthantri S et al (2017) The pattern of uveitis among Chinese, Malays, and Indians in Singapore. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 25(suppl):s81–s93

    Google Scholar 

  23. 陆道平, 孙襄男, 乐伊娣, 等, 应用周边前房深度检查法普查 青光眼. 中华眼科杂志1980, 16(3): 204–205

  24. Jiang JH, Zhang SD, Dai ML et al (2017) Posner Schlossman syndrome in Wenzhou, China: a retrospective review study. Br J Ophathalmol 101(12):1638–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Raitta C, Vannas A (1977) Glaucomatocyclitic crisis. Arch Ophthalmol 95(4):608–612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. General Hospital of the Central Theater of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, No. 627 Wuluo Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China

    Huafang Guo, Wenqiang Zhang & Qian Ye

Authors
  1. Huafang Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenqiang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qian Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian Ye.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author Huafang Guo declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Qian Ye declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Wenqiang Zhang declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Human and animal participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. This retrospective study was objectivity and transparency in research, and accepted principles of ethical and professional conduct have been followed. All the authors of this paper have no financial interest in relation to the submission. Human participants in this research have been informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, H., Zhang, W. & Ye, Q. A meta-analysis of the rate and related factors of glaucomatous optic nerve damage in patients with Glaucomatocyclitic Crisis. Int Ophthalmol 40, 3145–3153 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01527-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01527-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation