Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical outcomes of corneal refractive surgery comparing centration on the corneal vertex with the pupil center: a meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the visual and refractive outcomes between centration on the corneal vertex and the pupil center in corneal refractive surgery.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. The primary outcomes were the postoperative spherical equivalent (SE), effectiveness [uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) ≥ 20/20, eyes within ± 0.50 diopter (D) of target refraction], and safety [loss ≥ 2 lines of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA)]. Higher-order aberrations were considered secondary outcomes.

Results

Seven studies describing a total of 1964 eyes were included in this meta-analysis. A statistical significance in postoperative SE was found between the two centration methods for the correction of myopia that favor the CV-centered method (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the proportion of eyes with UDVA ≥ 20/20 or loss ≥ 2 lines of CDVA postoperatively. However, the proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 D was slightly higher (p = 0.02) and the coma aberration was much lower in the corneal vertex-centered method (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Preferable visual and refractive outcomes could be achieved with either centering on the corneal vertex or pupil center in corneal refractive surgery; however, the corneal vertex-centered method has shown partial benefits in some clinical indices. In order to obtain higher quality of clinical evidences, more randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required in further investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Uozato H, Guyton DL (1987) Centering corneal surgical procedures. Am J Ophthalmol 103:264–275

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pande M, Hillman JS (1993) Optical zone centration in keratorefractive surgery. Entrance pupil center, visual axis, coaxially sighted corneal reflex, or geometric corneal center? Ophthalmology 100:1230–1237

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Park CY, Oh SY, Chuck RS (2012) Measurement of angle kappa and centration in refractive surgery. Curr Opin Opthalmol 23:269–275

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lazaridis A, Droutsas K, Sekundo W (2014) Topographic analysis of the centration of the treatment zone after SMILE for myopia and comparison to FS-LASIK: subjective versus objective alignment. J Refract Surg 30:680–686

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Mierdel P, Seiler T (2001) Increased higher-order optical aberrations after laser refractive surgery: a problem of subclinical decentration. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:362–369

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee SB, Hwang BS, Lee J (2010) Effects of decentration of photorefractive keratectomy on the induction of higher order wavefront aberrations. J Refract Surg 26:731–743

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buhren J, Yoon G, MacRae S, Huxlin K (2010) Contribution of optical zone decentration and pupil dilation on the change of optical quality after myopic photorefractive keratectomy in a cat model. J Refract Surg 26:183–190

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Manzanera S, Prieto PM, Benito A, Tabernero J, Artal P (2015) Location of achromatizing pupil position and first purkinje reflection in a normal population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:962–966

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mosquera SA, Verma S, Mcalinden C (2015) Centration axis in refractive surgery. Eye & Vision 2:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chang DH, Waring GO (2014) The subject-fixated coaxially sighted corneal light reflex: a clinical marker for centration of refractive treatments and devices. Am J Ophthalmol 158:863–874

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S (2011) Results of small incision lenticule extraction: all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:127–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. https://www.cochrane-handbook.org

  13. Arbelaez MC, Vidal C, Arba-Mosquera S (2008) Clinical outcomes of corneal vertex versus central pupil references with aberration-free ablation strategies and LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:5287–5294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu LC, Zhou XT, Chu RY, Wang Q (2009) Photoablation centration on the corneal optical center in myopic LASIK using AOV excimer laser. Eur J Ophthalmol 19:923–929

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Okamoto S, Kimura K, Funakura M, Ikeda N, Hiramatsu H, Bains HS (2011) Comparison of wavefront-guided aspheric laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: coaxially sighted corneal-light-reflex versus line-of-sight centration. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:1951–1960

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng Q, Lian JC, Zhang J, Yao WQ, Zhang SS, Ye S (2016) Comparison of visual effects after LASIK in myopia between centered on the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex and line of sight. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 52:499–506

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang J, Zhang SS, Yu Q, Lian JC (2017) Comparison of visual effects of FS-LASIK for myopia centered on the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex or the line of sight. Int J Ophthalmol 10:624–631

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kermani O, Oberheide U, Schmiedt K, Gerten G, Bains HS (2009) Outcomes of hyperopic LASIK with the NIDEK NAVEX platform centered on the visual axis or line of sight. J Refract Surg 25:S98–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Soler V, Benito A, Soler P, Triozon C, Arné JL, Madariaga V et al (2011) A randomized comparison of pupil-centered versus vertex-centered ablation in LASIK correction of hyperopia. Am J Ophthalmol 152:591–599

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang JS, Law AK, Ng JC, Chan VK (2016) Comparison of refractive and visual outcomes with centration points 80% and 100% from pupil center toward the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:412–419

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Okamoto S, Kimura K, Funakura M, Ikeda N, Hiramatsu H, Bains HS (2009) Comparison of myopic LASIK centered on the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex or line of sight. J Refract Surg 25:S944–950

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mandell RB, Chiang CS, Klein SA (1995) Location of the major corneal reference points. Optom Vis Sci 72:776–784

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maloney RK (1990) Corneal topography and optical zone location in photorefractive keratectomy. Refract Corneal Surg 6:363–371

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Basmak H, Sahin A, Yildirim N, Papakostas TD, Kanellopoulos AJ (2007) Measurement of angle kappa with synoptophore and Orbscan II in a normal population. J Refract Surg 23:456–460

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mathur A, Gehrmann J, Atchison DA (2014) Influences of luminance and accommodation stimuli on pupil size and pupil center location. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:2166–2172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu YL, Yeh PT, Huang JY, Wang IJ, Chen WL, Hu FR et al (2013) Pupil centroid shift and cyclotorsion in bilateral wavefront-guided laser refractive surgery and the correlation between both eyes. J Formos Med Assoc 112:64–71

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M (2012) Is Topography-guided ablation profile centered on the corneal vertex better than wavefront-guided ablation profile centered on the entrance pupil? J Refract Surg 28:139–143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Reinstein DZ, Gobbe M, Archer TJ (2013) Coaxially sighted corneal light reflex versus entrance pupil center centration of moderate to high hyperopic corneal ablations in eyes with small and large angle kappa. J Refract Surg 29:518–525

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chan CC, Boxer Wachler BS (2006) Centration analysis of ablation over the coaxial corneal light reflex for hyperopic LASIK. J Refract Surg 22:467–471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. de Ortueta D, Schreyger FD (2007) Centration on the cornea vertex normal during hyperopic refractive photoablation using videokeratoscopy. J Refract Surg 23:198–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wachler BS, Korn TS, Chandra NS, Michel FK (2003) Decentration of the optical zone: centering on the pupil versus the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex in LASIK for hyperopia. J Refract Surg 19:464–465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G (2015) LASIK ablation centration: an objective digitized assessment and comparison between two generations of an excimer laser. J Refract Surg 31:164–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kanellopoulos AJ (2012) Topography-guided hyperopic and hyperopic astigmatism femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: long-term experience with the 400 Hz eye-Q excimer platform. Clin Ophthalmol 6:895–901

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu Y, Wang Y (2019) Optical quality comparison between laser ablated myopic eyes with centration on coaxially sighted corneal light reflex and on entrance pupil center. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 36(4):B103–B109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vestergaard A, Ivarsen AR, Asp S, Hjortdal JØ (2012) Small-incision lenticule extraction for moderate to high myopia: predictability, safety, and patient satisfaction. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:2003–2010

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M (2011) Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 95:335–339

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kermani O (2004) Alignment in customized laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 20:S651–658

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81670884).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by JZ, XC, WW, and YW. The first draft of the manuscript was written by JZ, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author Jiamei Zhang declares that she has no conflicts of interest. Author Yan Wang declares that she has no conflicts of interest. Author Xiaoqin Chen declares that she has no conflicts of interest. Author Wenjing Wu declares that she has no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Chen, X. et al. Clinical outcomes of corneal refractive surgery comparing centration on the corneal vertex with the pupil center: a meta-analysis. Int Ophthalmol 40, 3555–3563 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01506-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01506-1

Keywords

Navigation