Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to compare static and dynamic pupil responses of diabetic patients with and without nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (DR) and normal healthy individuals under different lighting conditions via quantitative automated pupillometry.
Methods
Forty patients with DM with nonproliferative DR (group 1), 40 patients with DM without DR (group 2), and 40 healthy controls (group 3) underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination. Static pupillometry [scotopic pupil diameter (PD), mesopic PD, low photopic PD, and high photopic PD] and dynamic pupillometry (resting PD, contraction amplitude, latency, duration, velocity of contraction, dilatation latency, and duration and velocity at rest) were measured via automatic quantitative pupillometry.
Results
Analysis of variance revealed that scotopic PD [F(2, 117) = 6.42; p = 0.02], mesopic PD [F(2, 117) = 3.20; p = 0.04], and low photopic PD [F(2, 117) = 4.86; p = 0.009] were significantly different among the groups. Scotopic PD and low photopic PD were significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (p = 0.03 and p = 0.03, respectively). Meanwhile, the resting diameter, velocity of pupil contraction, and velocity of pupil dilatation were found to be significantly lower (p = 0.02, p = 0.01, and p = 0.008, respectively), and the duration of pupil contraction was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 3 (p = 0.03).
Conclusion
Both DM patients with and without nonproliferative DR exhibited pupillary involvement. Automated pupillometry may be an easily applicable, noninvasive screening option for reducing mortality and morbidity rates associated with diabetic autonomic neuropathy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee R, Wong TY, Sabanayagam C (2015) Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema and related vision loss. Eye Vis. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-015-0026-2
Zhang X, Saaddine JB, Chou CF et al (2010) Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the United States, 2005–2008. JAMA—J Am Med Assoc 304:649–656. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1111
Heng LZ, Comyn O, Peto T et al (2013) Diabetic retinopathy: pathogenesis, clinical grading, management and future developments. Diabet Med 30:640–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12089
Vinik AI, Erbas T (2001) Recognizing and treating diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Clevel Clin J Med 68:928–944
Tesfaye S, Boulton AJM, Dyck PJ et al (2010) Diabetic neuropathies: update on definitions, diagnostic criteria, estimation of severity, and treatments. Diabetes Care 33:2285–2293. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1303
Vinik AI, Erbas T (2006) Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy: diagnosis and management. Curr Diabetes Rep 6:424–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-006-0074-z
Stein PK, Kleiger RE, Rottman JN (1997) Differing effects of age on heart rate variability in men and women. Am J Cardiol 80:302–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00350-0
Cahill M, Eustace P, De Jesus V (2001) Pupillary autonomic denervation with increasing duration of diabetes mellitus. Br J Ophthalmol 85:1225–1230. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.85.10.1225
Clarke CF, Piesowicz AT, Spathis GS (1989) Pupillary size in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 6:780–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.1989.tb01278.x
Fotiou F, Fountoulakis KN, Goulas A et al (2000) Automated standardized pupillometry with optical method for purposes of clinical practice and research. Clin Physiol 20:336–347. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2281.2000.00259.x
Meeker M, Du R, Bacchetti P et al (2005) Pupil examination: validity and clinical utility of an automated pupillometer. J Neurosci Nurs 37:34–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/01376517-200502000-00006
Truong JQ, Ciuffreda KJ (2016) Quantifying pupillary asymmetry through objective binocular pupillometry in the normal and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) populations. Brain Inj 30:1372–1377. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2016.1192220
Adhikari P, Zele AJ, Thomas R, Feigl B (2016) Quadrant field pupillometry detects melanopsin dysfunction in glaucoma suspects and early glaucoma. Sci Rep 6:33373. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33373
Kardon R, Anderson SC, Damarjian TG et al (2011) Chromatic pupillometry in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology 118:376–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.033
Zafar SF, Suarez JI (2014) Automated pupillometer for monitoring the critically ill patient: a critical appraisal. J Crit Care 29:599–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.01.012
Hsieh YT, Hu FR (2007) The correlation of pupil size measured by colvard pupillometer and orbscan II. J Refract Surg 23:789–795. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597x-20071001-08
Nakayama M, Nakamura J, Hamada Y et al (2001) Aldose reductase inhibition ameliorates pupillary light reflex and F-wave latency in patients with mild diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 24:1093–1098. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.6.1093
McNally PG, Lawrence IG, Panerai RB et al (1999) Sudden death in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 1:151–158. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1326.1999.00025.x
Reichard P, Pihl M (1994) Mortality and treatment side-effects during long-term intensified conventional insulin treatment in the Stockholm Diabetes Intervention Study. Diabetes 43:313–317. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.43.2.313
Donaghue KC, Pena MM, Fung ATW et al (1995) The prospective assessment of autonomic nerve function by pupillometry in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 12:868–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00388.x
Pittasch D, Lobmann R, Behrens-Baumann W, Lehnert H (2002) Pupil signs of sympathetic autonomic neuropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 25:1545–1550. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.9.1545
Katz BSI (1992) Pupillary changes of diabetic eye. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 5:379–388
Smith SA, Smith SE (1983) Evidence for a neuropathic aetiology in the small pupil of diabetes mellitus. Br J Ophthalmol 67:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.67.2.89
Feigl B, Zele AJ, Fader SM et al (2012) The post-illumination pupil response of melanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in diabetes. Acta Ophthalmol 90:e230–e234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02226.x
Lerner AG, Bernabé-Ortiz A, Ticse R et al (2015) Type 2 diabetes and cardiac autonomic neuropathy screening using dynamic pupillometry. Diabet Med 32:1470–1478. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12752
Ferrari GL, Marques JLB, Gandhi RA et al (2010) Using dynamic pupillometry as a simple screening tool to detect autonomic neuropathy in patients with diabetes: a pilot study. Biomed Eng Online 9:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-9-26
Yuan D, Spaeth EB, Vernino S, Muppidi S (2014) Disproportionate pupillary involvement in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Clin Auton Res 24:305–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-014-0258-6
Maguire AM, Craig ME, Craighead A et al (2007) Autonomic nerve testing predicts the development of complications: a 12-year follow-up study. Diabetes Care 30:77–82. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-0793
Clark CV (1988) Ocular autonomic nerve function in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Eye 2:96–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1988.20
Wang Y, Zekveld AA, Naylor G et al (2016) Parasympathetic nervous system dysfunction, as identified by pupil light reflex, and its possible connection to hearing impairment. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153566
Fujii T, Ishikawa S, Uga S (1977) Ultrastructure of iris muscles in diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmologica 174:228–239. https://doi.org/10.1159/000308607
Nitoda E, Kallinikos P, Pallikaris A et al (2012) Correlation of diabetic retinopathy and corneal neuropathy using confocal microscopy. Curr Eye Res 37:898–906. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2012.683507
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements) or nonfinancial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Erdem, S., Karahan, M., Ava, S. et al. The effectiveness of automatic pupillometry as a screening method to detect diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Int Ophthalmol 40, 3127–3134 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01499-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01499-x