Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regional comparison of preoperative biometry for cataract surgery between two domestic institutions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Regional variations of the preoperative biometry can affect the refractive accuracy of cataract surgery. We aimed to compare the preoperative biometric data for cataract surgery between two domestic institutions.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative biometric data of 673 consecutive eyes undergoing standard cataract surgery at Miyata Eye Hospital (Miyazaki; M group) and Kitasato University Hospital (Kanagawa; K group), and compared these data between the two groups.

Results

We found significant differences in the mean keratometric readings (44.39 ± 1.56 D vs. 44.09 ± 1.74 D) (unpaired t test, p = 0.034), the anterior chamber depth (3.14 ± 0.43 mm vs. 3.46 ± 0.62 mm) (p < 0.001), the axial length (23.98 ± 1.62 mm vs. 24.59 ± 1.82 mm) (p < 0.001), and the lens thickness (4.64 ± 0.48 mm vs. 4.37 ± 0.62 mm) (p < 0.001), in the M and K groups, respectively. Otherwise, we found no significant differences in corneal astigmatism (p = 0.104), or central corneal thickness (p = 0.480) between the two groups. For subgroup analysis, the prediction error (0.06 ± 0.47 D) in the M group was significantly more hyperopic than that (− 0.09 ± 0.54 D) in the K group (p = 0.006).

Conclusions

There were significant differences in the mean keratometric readings, the anterior chamber depth, the axial length, and the lens thickness, by approximately 0.3 D, 0.3 mm, 0.6 mm, and 0.3 mm, respectively. Regional variations of the preoperative biometry did exist to some extent, and were not clinically negligible, in consideration of the precise IOL power calculation and the subsequent refractive accuracy of cataract surgery.

Trial registration

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (000037994).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data that support the findings of the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Wang J, Yuwen M (1993) Comparison between the Kazakh and the Han nationality for the diameter and thickness of senile cataractous lens in Tacheng. Yan Ke Xue Bao 9:190–192 (in Chinese)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trivedi RH, Wilson ME (2007) Biometry data from caucasian and african-american cataractous pediatric eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:4671–4678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoon JJ, Misra SL, McGhee CN, Patel DV (2016) Demographics and ocular biometric characteristics of patients undergoing cataract surgery in Auckland, New Zealand. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 44:106–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang D, Amoozgar B, Porco T, Wang Z, Lin SC (2017) Ethnic differences in lens parameters measured by ocular biometry in a cataract surgery population. PLoS ONE 12:e0179836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC (1990) Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 16:333–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goebels S, Pattmöller M, Eppig T, Cayless A, Seitz B, Langenbucher A (2015) Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:2387–2393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sato M, Kamiya K, Kojima T, Goto N, Tabuchi H, Hatsusaka N, Hayashi K (2019) 2019 Clinical survey of the Japanese Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. IOL&RS 33:453–473 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Olsen T, Hoffmann P (2014) C constant: new concept for ray tracing-assisted intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:764–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abulafia A, Barrett GD, Rotenberg M, Kleinmann G, Levy A, Reitblat O, Koch DD, Wang L, Assia EI (2015) Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:548–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Reitblat O, Levy A, Kleinmann G, Lerman TT, Assia EI (2017) Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with high and low average keratometry readings: comparison between various formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 43:1149–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ (2018) Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas. Ophthalmology 125:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barrett GD (1993) An improved universal theoretical formula for intraocular lens power prediction. J Cataract Refract Surg 19:713–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wan KH, Lam TC, Yu MC, Chan TC (2019) Accuracy and precision of intraocular lens calculations using the new Hill-RBF version 2.0 in eyes with high axial myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 205:66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KK and KM were involved in the design and conduct of the study, KK, FF, KI, and YM were involved in collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data, and KK, FF, KI, NS, YM, and KM were involved in preparation, review, and final approval of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazutaka Kamiya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This retrospective review of the clinical charts was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Kitasato University (C19-256) and Miyata Eye Hospital (CS 333-028), and followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent to participate

Our Institutional Review Board waived the requirement for informed consent for this retrospective study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamiya, K., Fujimura, F., Iijima, K. et al. Regional comparison of preoperative biometry for cataract surgery between two domestic institutions. Int Ophthalmol 40, 2923–2930 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01476-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01476-4

Keywords

Navigation