Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ciliary muscle dimensions measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and healthy eyes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare in vivo swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) measurements of the ciliary muscle (CM) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and healthy subjects, and examine correlations between CM dimensions and several covariates.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of the right eyes of 181 subjects: 89 POAG patients and 92 healthy subjects. Using the Triton SS-OCT device (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan), CM length (CML), area (CMA) and thickness measured 1000 µm (CMT1), 2000 µm (CMT2) and 3000 µm (CMT3) from the scleral spur were determined in the temporal and nasal quadrants. POAG patients were subjected to visual field (VF) and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) assessment. CM dimensions were then assessed for correlation with VF mean defect (MD), mean RNFL thickness and intraocular pressure (IOP).

Results

Mean CMLs were 4325 ± 340 µm and 4195 ± 843 µm for the healthy subjects and POAG patients, respectively (p = 0.17). Mean CM thicknesses were CMT1 = 546 ± 56 µm, CMT2 = 326 ± 44 µm and CMT3 = 174 ± 16 µm in the healthy eyes versus CMT1 = 534 ± 108, CMT2 = 332 ± 99 and CMT3 = 183 ± 74 in the POAG eyes, with no significant differences detected (all p ≥ 0.25). In the temporal quadrant, mean CMA was 1.12 ± 0.29 mm2 and 1.15 ± 0.24 mm2 for the healthy and POAG subjects, respectively (p = 0.45). No correlations were observed between CM measurements and RNFL thickness (p ≥ 0.15), IOP or VF MD (p ≥ 0.14) in POAG subjects irrespective of glaucoma severity (p ≥ 0.19).

Conclusions

While SS-OCT proved useful to measure CM dimensions in vivo, these dimensions did not differ between healthy individuals and POAG subjects. In the patients with POAG, no correlations were detected between CM dimensions and VF, RNFL or IOP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sheppard AL, Davies LN (2010) In vivo analysis of ciliary muscle morphologic changes with accommodation and axial ametropia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:6882–6889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis HA, Kai C, Sinnott LT, Bailey MD (2012) Changes in ciliary muscle thickness during accommodation in children. Optom Vis Sci 89:727–737

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lossing LA, Sinnott LT, Kai C, Richdale K, Bailey MD (2012) Measuring changes in ciliary muscle thickness with accommodation in young adults. Optom Vis Sci 89:719–726

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheppard AL, Davies LN (2011) The effect of ageing on in vivo human ciliary muscle morphology and contractility. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:1809–1816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mao Y, Bai HX, Li B, Xu XL, Gao F, Zhang ZB, Jonas JB (2018) Dimensions of the ciliary muscles of Brücke, Müller and Iwanoff and their associations with axial length and glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256:2165–2171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Croft MA, Lütjen-Drecoll E, Kaufman PL (2017) Age-related posterior ciliary muscle restriction—a link between trabecular meshwork and optic nerve head pathophysiology. Exp Eye Res 158:187–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ku JY, Nongpiur ME, Park J, Narayanaswamy AK, Perera SA, Tun TA, Kumar RS, Baskaran M, Aung T (2014) Qualitative evaluation of the iris and ciliary body by ultrasound biomicroscopy in subjects with angle closure. J Glaucoma 23:583–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindsey JD, Kashiwagi K, Kashiwagi F et al (1997) Prostaglandins alter extracellular matrix adjacent to human ciliary muscle cells in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:2214–2223

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marchini G, Babighian S, Tosi R et al (1999) Effects of 0.2% brimonidine on ocular anterior structures. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 15:337–344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bailey MD, Sinnott LT, Mutti DO (2008) Ciliary body thickness and refractive error in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:4352–4360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeon S, Lee WK, Lee K, Moon NJ (2012) Diminished ciliary muscle movement on accommodation in myopia. Exp Eye Res 105:9–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pucker AD, Sinnott LT, Kao C, Bailey MD (2013) Region specific relationships between refractive error and ciliary muscle thickness in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:4710–4716

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lütjen-Drecoll E, Shimizu T, Rohrbach M, Rohen JW (1986) Quantitative analysis of ‘plaque material’ between ciliary muscle tips in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Exp Eye Res 42:457–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gao K, Li F, Li Y, Li X, Huang W, Chen S, Liu Y, Aung T, Zhang X (2018) Anterior choroidal thickness increased in primary open-angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure disease eyes evidenced by ultrasound biomicroscopy and SS-OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59:1270–1277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aiello AL, Tran VT, Rao NA (1992) Postnatal development of the ciliary body and pars plana. Arch Ophthalmol 110:802–805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Esteve-Taboada JJ, Domínguez-Vicent A, Monsálvez-Romín D, Del Águila-Carrasco AJ, Montés-Micó R (2017) Non-invasive measurements of the dynamic changes in the ciliary muscle, crystalline lens morphology, and anterior chamber during accommodation with a high-resolution OCT. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255:1385–1394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruggeri M, de Freitas C, Williams S, Hernandez VM, Cabot F, Yesilirmak N, Alawa K, Chang YC, Yoo SH, Gregori G, Parel JM, Manns F (2016) Quantification of the ciliary muscle and crystalline lens interaction during accommodation with synchronous OCT imaging. Biomed Opt Express 7:1351–1364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Pardue MT, Sivak JG (2000) Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle. Optom Vis Sci 77:204–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Domínguez-Vicent A, Monsálvez-Romín D, Esteve-Taboada JJ, Montés-Micó R, Ferrer-Blasco T (2019) Effect of age in the ciliary muscle during accommodation: sectorial analysis. J Optom 12:14–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ang M, Baskaran M, Werkmeister RM, Chua J, Schmidl D, Aranha Dos Santos V, Garhöfer G, Mehta JS, Schmetterer L (2018) Anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Prog Retin Eye Res 66:132–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Laughton DS, Coldrick BJ, Sheppard AL, Davies LN (2015) A program to analyse optical coherence tomography images of the ciliary muscle. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye 38:402–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fernandez-Vigo JI, Shi H, Kudsieh B, Arriola-Villalobos P, De-Pablo Gómez-de-Liaño L, García-Feijóo J, Fernández-Vigo JA (2019) Ciliary muscle dimensions by swept-source optical coherence tomography and correlation study in a large population. Acta Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bailey MD (2011) How should we measure the ciliary muscle? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:1817–1818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang Z, Chung C, Lin J, Xu J, Huang J (2016) Quantitative measurements of the ciliary body in eyes with acute primary-angle closure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57:3299–3305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marchini G, Ghilotti G, Bonadimani M, Babighian S (2003) Effects of 0.005% latanoprost on ocular anterior structures and ciliary body thickness. J Glaucoma 12:295–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Oliveira C, Tello C, Liebmann JM, Ritch R (2005) Ciliary body thickness increases with increasing axial myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 140:324–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li X, Wang W, Huang W, Chen S, Wang J, Wang Z, Liu Y, He M, Zhang X (2018) Difference of uveal parameters between the acute primary angle closure eyes and the fellow eyes. Eye (Lond) 32:1174–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Výborný P, Hejsek L, Sicáková S, Pasta J (2007) Changes of the thickness of the ciliary body after the latanoprost 0.005% application. Cesk Slov Oftalmol 63:418–421

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No financial support was received for this submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bachar Kudsieh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the other authors has a conflict of interest with this submission.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kudsieh, B., Fernández-Vigo, J.I., Shi, H. et al. Ciliary muscle dimensions measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and healthy eyes. Int Ophthalmol 40, 2247–2255 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01405-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01405-5

Keywords

Navigation