Comparing the efficacy of trabeculectomy and diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in primary open-angle glaucoma
- 69 Downloads
The aim was to compare the postsurgical outcomes of trabeculectomy (TET) and transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) in a similar cohort of eyes diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).
Materials and methods
For this monocentric non-randomized retrospective comparative trial, the records of eyes which underwent TET or CPC between 2013 and 2016 at our institution for the treatment of POAG were reviewed. Parameters analyzed before surgery as well as 1 and 2–3 years afterwards were visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), mean defect (MD) of the visual field, number of glaucoma medications and the objective refraction using which the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was calculated.
In total, 51 eyes of 51 patients underwent TET and 45 eyes of 45 patients underwent CPC. Mean VA dropped in both groups on the last follow-up after surgery (TET-group: 0.17 ± 0.17 to 0.23 ± 0.28 logMAR, p = 0.01/CPC-group: 0.22 ± 0.22 to 0.26 ± 0.27 logMAR, p = 0.01). In the TET- and CPC-groups IOP decreased significantly (TET: 24.9 ± 6.4 to 14.9 ± 3.1 mmHg, p = 0.001/CPC: 23.0 ± 6.5 to 16.0 ± 4.1 mmHg, p = 0.001) although more pronounced and less depending on IOP-lowering medication in eyes after TET. MD remained stable after TET (7.4 ± 4.8 and 8.1 ± 4.9 dB, p = 0.1) but further deteriorated in eyes after CPC (9.0 ± 4.9 and 10.7 ± 4.6 dB, p < 0.001). SIA was comparable in both groups on the last follow-up (TET: 0.83 ± 0.69 D; CPC: 0.91 ± 0.65 D, p = 0.6).
The IOP reduction achieved without medication was more pronounced in the TET-group compared with the CPC-group. Visual field remained stable in the TET-group, while further deteriorating in the CPC-group during follow-up. Eyes undergoing CPC had a higher demand for additional medication to reach comparable success rates as TET. Due to this performing TET is favorable over CPC in POAG eyes.
KeywordsPrimary open-angle glaucoma Trabeculectomy Cyclophotocoagulation Ophthalmic surgery
- 10.Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ et al (2012) Treatment outcomes in the tube versus trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 153(789–803):e782Google Scholar
- 11.Ness PJ, Khaimi MA, Feldman RM et al (2012) Intermediate term safety and efficacy of transscleral cyclophotocoagulation after tube shunt failure. J Glaucoma 21:83–88Google Scholar
- 12.Gupta V, Agarwal HC (2000) Contact trans-scleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation treatment for refractory glaucomas in the Indian population. Indian J Ophthalmol 48:295–300Google Scholar
- 14.Grueb M, Rohrbach JM, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Schlote T (2006) Transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation as primary and secondary surgical treatment in primary open-angle and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma. Long-term clinical outcomes. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie 244:1293–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Contreras I, Noval S, Gonzalez Martin-Moro J, Rebolleda G (2004) Munoz-Negrete FJ [IOP spikes following contact transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation]. Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia 79:105–109Google Scholar
- 26.Pablo LE, Gomez ML, Pueyo M et al (1996) Semiconductor diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation versus filtering surgery with Mitomycin-C. Int Ophthalmol 20:11–14Google Scholar
- 30.Folgar FA, de Moraes CG, Prata TS et al (2010) Glaucoma surgery decreases the rates of localized and global visual field progression. Am J Ophthalmol 149(258–264):e252Google Scholar
- 34.Seah SK, Prata JA Jr, Minckler DS et al (1995) Visual recovery after trabeculectomy. J Glaucoma 4:228–234Google Scholar
- 36.Rosen WJ, Mannis MJ, Brandt JD (1992) The effect of trabeculectomy on corneal topography. Ophthalmic Surg 23:395–398Google Scholar