Abstract
Purpose
To compare the one-year efficacy of accelerated and standard 5.4 J/cm2 protocols of cross-linking (CXL) in the treatment of progressive keratoconus.
Methods
In this systematic review, two members of the research team searched Scopus, Pubmed, ISI, Ovid, Science Direct, and Cochrane databases independently for publications between January 2010 and December 2016. The majority of retrieved studies were not randomized clinical trials (RCT), or the second arm of the RCT was either untreated or customized CXL. The outcomes of interest were uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, maximum keratometry in the central 3 mm, minimum keratometry in the central 3 mm, and corneal thickness in the apex or thinnest point at baseline and 1 year after CXL.
Results
Of the 453 papers found in the preliminary search, 23 papers were included in the final analysis. Analysis of variance of one-year changes showed that longer irradiation times were associated with a greater corneal flattening effect, although there was no difference in terms of improvement in vision or refraction.
Conclusions
In other words, efficacy is comparable among different CXL protocols, so it is recommended to use the standard method in cases where maximum flattening is expected, such as young people and severe cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW (1984) Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol 28:293–322
Vazirani J, Basu S (2013) Keratoconus: current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol 7:2019–2030
Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T (2003) Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 135:620–627
Vega-Estrada A, Alio JL, Plaza Puche AB, Marshall J (2012) Outcomes of a new microwave procedure followed by accelerated cross-linking for the treatment of keratoconus: a pilot study. J Refract Surg 28:787–793
Tsatsos M, MacGregor C, Kopsachilis N, Anderson D (2014) Is accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus the way forward? Yes. Eye (Basingstoke) 28:784–785
Mrochen M (2013) Current status of accelerated corneal cross-linking. Indian J Ophthalmol 61:428–429
Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Miraftab M, Bahrmandy H, Seyedian MA, Amanzadeh K, Heidarian S, Nikbin H, Asgari S (2015) Short-term comparison of accelerated and standard methods of corneal collagen crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:533–540
Cinar Y, Cingu AK, Turkcu FM, Cinar T, Yuksel H, Ozkurt ZG, Caca I (2014) Comparison of accelerated and conventional corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 33:218–222
MacGregor C, Tsatsos M, Hossain P (2014) Is accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus the way forward? No. Eye (Basingstoke) 28:786–787
Aldahlawi NH, Hayes S, O’Brart DP, Meek KM (2015) Standard versus accelerated riboflavin-ultraviolet corneal collagen crosslinking: resistance against enzymatic digestion. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:1989–1996
Chow VW, Chan TC, Yu M, Wong VW, Jhanji V (2015) One-year outcomes of conventional and accelerated collagen crosslinking in progressive keratoconus. Sci Rep 5:14425
Tomita M, Mita M, Huseynova T (2014) Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:1013–1020
Sadoughi MM, Einollahi B, Baradaran-Rafii A, Roshandel D, Hasani H, Nazeri M (2018) Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen cross-linking in patients with keratoconus: an intrapatient comparative study. Int Ophthalmol 38:67–74
Wernli J, Schumacher S, Spoerl E, Mrochen M (2013) The efficacy of corneal cross-linking shows a sudden decrease with very high intensity UV light and short treatment time. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:1176–1180
Hammer A, Richoz O, Arba Mosquera S, Tabibian D, Hoogewoud F, Hafezi F (2014) Corneal biomechanical properties at different corneal cross-linking (CXL) irradiances. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:2881–2884
Crowe M, Sheppard L, Campbell A (2011) Comparison of the effects of using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool versus informal appraisal in assessing health research: a randomised trial. Int J Evid Based Healthc 9:444–449
Crowe M, Sheppard L, Campbell A (2012) Reliability analysis for a proposed critical appraisal tool demonstrated value for diverse research designs. J Clin Epidemiol 65:375–383
Bozkurt E, Ozgurhan EB, Akcay BIS, Kurt T, Yildirim Y, Gunaydin ZK, Demirok A (2017) Refractive, topographic, and aberrometric results at 2-year follow-up for accelerated corneal cross-link for progressive keratoconus. J Ophthalmol 2017:5714372
Medeiros CS, Giacomin NT, Bueno RL, Ghanem RC, Moraes HV Jr, Santhiago MR (2016) Accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking: technique, efficacy, safety, and applications. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:1826–1835
Mita M, Waring GO, Tomita M (2014) High-irradiance accelerated collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus: six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:1032–1040
Waszczykowska A, Jurowski P (2015) Two-year accelerated corneal cross-linking outcome in patients with progressive keratoconus. Biomed Res Int 2015:325157
Grentzelos MA, Kymionis GD (2015) Corneal stromal demarcation line after high-intensity (accelerated) collagen crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:252
Hashemi H, Asgari S (2016) Mesopic visual quality after accelerated corneal cross linking: a 12-month follow-up study. J Curr Ophthalmol 29:116–119
Ng AL, Chan TC, Lai JS, Cheng AC (2015) Comparison of the central and peripheral corneal stromal demarcation line depth in conventional versus accelerated collagen cross-linking. Cornea 34:1432–1436
Liu Y, Liu Y, Zhang YN, Li AP, Zhang J, Liang QF, Jie Y, Pan ZQ (2017) Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing modified cross-linking and standard cross-linking for progressive keratoconus. Int J Ophthalmol 10:1419–1429
Hashemi H, Miraftab M, Seyedian MA, Hafezi F, Bahrmandy H, Heidarian S, Amanzadeh K, Nikbin H, Fotouhi A, Asgari S (2015) Long-term results of an accelerated corneal cross-linking protocol (18 mW/cm2) for the treatment of progressive keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 160(1164–70):e1
Shetty R, Pahuja NK, Nuijts RM, Ajani A, Jayadev C, Sharma C, Nagaraja H (2015) Current protocols of corneal collagen cross-linking: visual, refractive, and tomographic outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol 160:243–249
Asgari S, Hashemi H, Mohamadi A, Jafarzadehpur E, Miraftab M, Shahhoseini S, Mehravaran S, Fotouhi A (2018) Scotopic contrast sensitivity and glare after accelerated corneal cross-linking. Clin Exp Optom 101:52–56
Asgari S, Hashemi H, Miraftab M, Shahhoseini S, Jafarzadhpur E, Mehravaran S, Fotouhi A (2017) Photopic, mesopic, and scotopic visual acuity after 18 mW/cm2 accelerated corneal cross-linking. Eye Contact Lens 44:S185–S189. https://doi.org/10.1097/icl.0000000000000377
Koller T, Mrochen M, Seiler T (2009) Complication and failure rates after corneal crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1358–1362
McAnena L, Doyle F, O’Keefe M (2017) Cross-linking in children with keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol 95:229–239
Chunyu T, Xiujun P, Zhengjun F, Sarig T, Shenhav L, Varssano D (2014) Corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 4:5652
Toprak I, Yaylali V, Yildirim C (2014) Factors affecting outcomes of corneal collagen crosslinking treatment. Eye (Lond) 28:41–46
Hashemi H, Seyedian MA, Miraftab M, Fotouhi A, Asgari S (2013) Corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and ultraviolet a irradiation for keratoconus: long-term results. Ophthalmology 120:1515–1520
Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J (2013) Collagen cross-linking for advanced progressive keratoconus. Cornea 32:903–906
Asri D, Touboul D, Fournie P, Malet F, Garra C, Gallois A, Malecaze F, Colin J (2011) Corneal collagen crosslinking in progressive keratoconus: multicenter results from the French National Reference Center for Keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:2137–2143
Hersh PS, Greenstein SA, Fry KL (2011) Corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: one-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:149–160
Wittig-Silva C, Chan E, Islam FM, Wu T, Whiting M, Snibson GR (2014) A randomized, controlled trial of corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus: three-year results. Ophthalmology 121:812–821
Spoerl E, Huhle M, Seiler T (1998) Induction of cross-links in corneal tissue. Exp Eye Res 66:97–103
Touboul D, Efron N, Smadja D, Praud D, Malet F, Colin J (2012) Corneal confocal microscopy following conventional, transepithelial, and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking procedures for keratoconus. J Refract Surg 28:769–776
Bouheraoua N, Jouve L, El Sanharawi M, Sandali O, Temstet C, Loriaut P, Basli E, Borderie V, Laroche L (2014) Optical coherence tomography and confocal microscopy following three different protocols of corneal collagen-crosslinking in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:7601–7609
Funding
No funding was received for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miraftab, M., Hashemi, H., Abdollahi, M. et al. The efficacy of standard versus accelerated epi-off corneal cross-linking protocols: a systematic review and sub-group analysis. Int Ophthalmol 39, 2675–2683 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01091-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01091-y