Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unusual microbiological presentations in polymicrobial post-operative endophthalmitis and their clinical correlations

  • Case Report
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To report the clinical course, microbiological spectrum and visual outcomes of three cases of post-operative endophthalmitis caused by unusual combination of micro-organisms.

Methods

Retrospective review of medical charts at a tertiary eye care centre over a period of 1 year, of subjects with post-operative endophthalmitis and more than one microbiological isolate.

Results

We report 3 cases with unusual combination of microorganisms. In case 1, two organisms (Burkholderia cepacia and Aeromonas veronii, from the vitreous cavity and capsular bag, respectively) with an identical antibiotic sensitivity pattern were found, while in case 2, the organisms (Streptococcus pneumoniae and Sphingomonas paucimobilis, from cornea and vitreous cavity, respectively) isolated had different sensitivity patterns. In case 3, two different strains of the same organism (Enterococcus faecalis) were found. Cases 1 and 2 achieved good anatomical and visual outcomes, while in case 3, vision remained poor despite a good anatomical outcome.

Conclusion

Unusual combinations of organisms in post-operative endophthalmitis can introduce unique clinical characteristics and should specifically be considered in atypical clinical presentations, poor response to standard therapy and unusual recurrence patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Kasper Mino H, Kollmann M, Klauss V (1993) Endophthalmitis: importance of microbiologic studies for therapy and prognosis. Ophthalmologe 90(6):726–736

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tuft S (2006) Polymicrobial infection and the eye. Br J Ophthalmol 90(3):257–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jindal A, Moreker MR, Pathengay A, Khera M, Jalali S, Majji A, Mathai A, Sharma S, Das T, Flynn HW Jr (2013) Polymicrobial endophthalmitis: prevalence, causative organisms and visual outcomes. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect 3:6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Anand AR, Therese KL, Madhavan HN (2000) Spectrum of aetiological agents of post-operative endophthalmitis and antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates. Indian J Ophthalmol 48:123–128

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pijl BJ, Theelen T, Tilanus MA, Rentenaar R, Crama N (2010) Acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: 250 consecutive cases treated at a tertiary referral centre in the Netherlands. Am J Ophthalmol 149:482–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Essex RW, Charles PG, Allen PJ (2004) Three cases of post-traumatic endophthalmitis caused by unusual bacteria. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 32(4):445–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sachdeva V, Pathengay A, Joseph J, Sharma S, Das T (2011) Burkholderia cepacia endophthalmitis: clinico-microbiologic profile and outcomes. Retina 31(9):1801–1805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ryan L, Higgins G, Doyle M (2017) Aeromonas species endogenous endophthalmitis. JMM Case Rep 4(5):e005094

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Scoaris DO, Colacite J, Nakamura CV et al (2008) Virulence and antibiotic susceptibility of Aeromonas spp. isolated from drinking water. Antonie van Leewenhoek 93(1-2):111–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller JJ, Scott IU, Flynn HW Jr, Smiddy WE, Corey RP, Miller D (2004) Endophthalmitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Am J Ophthalmol 138(2):231–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. An Hotterbeekx, Singh SK, Goossens H, Malhotra S (2017) In vivo and In vitro Interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus spp. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramakrishnan R, Bharathi MJ, Shivkumar C, Mittal S, Meenakshi R et al (2009) Microbiological profile of culture-proven cases of exogenous an endogenous endophthalmitis: a 10 year retrospective study. Eye 23:945–956

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fraser SG, Ohri R (1995) Endophthalmitis caused by Enterococcus faecalis. Eye 9:535–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Todokoro D, Suzuki T, Kobayakawa S et al (2017) Postoperative Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis: virulence factors leading to poor visual outcome. Jpn J Ophthalmol 61(5):408–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanchita Mitra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mitra, S., Padhi, T.R., Basu, S. et al. Unusual microbiological presentations in polymicrobial post-operative endophthalmitis and their clinical correlations. Int Ophthalmol 39, 2143–2148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-1019-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-1019-7

Keywords

Navigation