Abstract
Purpose
To assess posterior inflammation using a fluorescein (FA)/indocyanine-green angiography (ICGA) scoring system, and compare them to the presently recommended outcome measure, the standardization of uveitis nomenclature vitreous haze score (SUN-VH) in stromal choroiditis.
Methods
This was a retrospective study on patients with a diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis(OS), ocular tuberculosis(OT), Birdshot retinochoroiditis(BRC) and Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease(VKH) seen in the Centre for Ophthalmic Specialized Care, Lausanne, Switzerland. Angiography signs were quantified according to an established FA/ICGA scoring system. Vitritis was assessed using SUN-VH. Results were compared.
Results
65 newly diagnosed patients (128 eyes) with stromal choroiditis were included. Angiographic scoring showed variable degrees of choroidal versus retinal involvement (87% for OS, 72% for OT, 62.5% for BRC and 100% for VKH). On the other hand, a mere 22 of 128 eyes (17%) showed a SUN-VH score ≥ 2 necessary for inclusion in clinical trials. Moreover, FA/ICGA values followed a normal distribution curve and presented inter-examiner variations greater than 1-SD in only 8.4% of cases. SUN-VH values’ distribution was non-normal and showed inter-examiner discrepancies greater than 1-SD in 51.7% of cases.
Conclusion
This study highlights the precise measurement of global posterior inflammation achieved by a dual FA/ICGA scoring system in stromal choroiditis. In contrast, SUN-VH scale appears imprecise and inadequate, as only a minute percentage of the studied eyes could have been included in a clinical trial based on this criterion. To evaluate posterior intraocular inflammation meaningfully in stromal choroiditis, the use of dual FA/ICGA is strongly advised and should replace the presently recommended SUN-VH system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Herbort CP, Tugal-Tutkun I (2017) The importance of quantitative measurement methods for uveitis: laser flare photometry endorsed in Europe while neglected in Japan where the technology measuring quantitatively intraocular inflammation was developed. Int Ophthalmol 37(3):469–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0253-0
Moballeghi M, Moghaddam GG (2008) How do we measure use of scientific journals? A note on research methodologies. Scientometrics 76(1):125–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1901-y
Mol BW, Lijmer GJ, Evers JL, Bossuyt PM (2003) Characteristics of good diagnostic studies. In: Seminars in reproductive medicine, vol 21, pp. 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-39991
Forrester JV, Okada AA, BenEzra D, Ohno S (1998) Posterior segment intraocular inflammation guidelines, 1998-10-05/90-6299-167-X
Tugal-Tutkun II, Herbort CP, Khairallah M, Angiography Scoring for Uveitis Working Group (ASUWOG) (2008) Scoring of dual fluorescein and ICG inflammatory angiographic signs for the grading of posterior segment inflammation (dual fluorescein and ICG angiographic scoring system for uveitis), Int Ophthalmol. 30(5): 539–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-008-9263-x
Bouchenaki N, Herbort CP (2005) Stromal Choroiditis. In: Krieglstein GK, Weinreb RN, Pleyer U, Mondino B (eds) Uveitis and Immunological Disorders. Essentials in Ophthalmology. Springer, Berlin
Van Tran T, Auer C, Guex-Crosier Y et al (1994) Epidemiological characteristics of uveitis in Switzerland. Int Ophthalmol 18:293. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917833
Cimino L, Herbort CP, Aldigeri R et al (2009) Tuberculous uveitis, a resurgent and underdiagnosed disease. Int Ophthalmol 29:67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-007-9071-8
Herbort Hr CP, Pavésio C, LeHoang P, Bodaghi B, Fardeau C, Kestelyn P, Neri P (2017) Why birdshot retinochoroiditis should rather be called “HLA-A29 uveitis”. Br J Ophthalmol 101(7):851–855. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309764
Abu El-Asrar AM, Hemachandran S, Al-Mezaine HS, Kangave D, Al-Muammar AM (2012) The outcome of mycophenolate mofetil therapy combined with systemic corticosteroids in acute uveitis associated with Kogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Acta Ophthalmol 90:e603–e608
Faiz IS (2015) Ocular tuberculosis: current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol 2015(9):2223–2227. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s65254
Krassas N, Wells J, Bell C, Woodhead M, Jones N (2018) Presumed tuberculosis-associated uveitis: rising incidence and widening criteria for diagnosis in a non-endemic area. Eye (Lond) 32(1):87–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2017.152
Herbort CPI, Rao NA, Mochizuki M, members of Scientific Committee of First International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (2017) In: International criteria for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis: results of the first International Workshop On Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS). Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 17(3):160–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273940902818861
Nussenblatt RB, Palestine AG, Chan CC et al (1985) Standardization of vitreal inflammatory activity in intermediate and posterior uveitis. Ophthalmology 92:467–471
Jabs DA, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT (2005) Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group. Standardization of uveitis nomenclature for reporting clinical data. Results of the First International Workshop. Am J Ophthalmol 140:509–516
Herbort CPI, LeHoang P, Guex-Crosier Y (1998) Schematic interpretation of indocyanine green angiography in posterior uveitis using a standard angiographic protocol. Ophthalmology 105(3):432–440
Tugal-Tutkun I, Herbort CP, Khairallah M, Mantovani A (2010) Interobserver agreement in scoring of dual fluorescein and ICG inflammatory angiographic signs for the grading of posterior segment inflammation. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 18:385–389
Davis JL (2010) Scale for photographic grading of vitreous haze in uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 150(5):637–641
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Human and animal rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gillmann, K., El Ameen, A., Massy, R. et al. Assessment of measurement methods of posterior inflammation in stromal choroiditis: the value of quantitative outcome measures versus the presently qualitatively based paradigm. Int Ophthalmol 39, 1567–1574 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0979-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0979-y