Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 311–315 | Cite as

Central corneal epithelial thickness changes after half-moon supracapsular nucleofractis phacoemulsification technique

  • Sedat Özmen
  • Burçin ÇakırEmail author
  • Nilgün Özkan Aksoy
  • Emine Doğan
  • Tural Babashli
  • Gürsoy Alagöz
Original Paper
  • 92 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To find out the effect of half-moon supracapsular nucleofractis technique on central corneal epithelial thickness (CET) measured by spectral domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).

Materials and methods

Patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery by the same surgeon with the same technique were recruited in this study. The effective phaco time (EPT) was recorded in each surgery. Central CET was measured by AS-OCT 1 day before and 1, 3, 7 days after surgery. CET was measured without precorneal tear film layer, and non-epithelial central corneal thickness was also calculated manually. Preoperative and postoperative values were compared by statistical analysis.

Results

Thirty-one eyes of 31 patients were included in this study. The mean age of patients was 65.03 ± 11.47 years. On the first day of surgery, increase in mean CET was statistically significant, but on the 3rd and 7th day after surgery, this increase was declined (p = 0.001, p = 0.367, p = 1, respectively). A statistically significant positive correlation was found between mean EPT and mean CET on the first postoperative day (p = 0.013, r = 0.470). On the 3rd and 7th day, this correlation was not statistically significant (p = 0.055, p = 0.454, respectively).

Conclusion

Mean central CET was statistically thicker and positive correlated with EPT on the first postoperative day. But on the 7th day, it declined to preoperative values.

Keywords

Corneal epithelial thickness Half-moon supracapsular nucleofractis technique Cataract surgery 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Human participants in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of Institutional Research Committee.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects in this study. The study was performed in adherence to the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

References

  1. 1.
    Kissner A, Kohlhaas M, Spörl E, Pillunat LE (2007) Corneal aberrations before and after corneal and corneoscleral small incision cataract surgery. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 224:95–100.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-927390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li XM, Hu L, Hu J, Wang W (2007) Investigation of dry eye disease and analysis of the pathogenic factors in patients after cataract surgery. Cornea 26:S16–S20.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31812f67ca CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Takahashi H (2016) Corneal endothelium and phacoemulsification. Cornea 35(Suppl 1):S3–S7.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.000000000000990 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim HK (2009) Decrease and conquer: phacoemulsification technique for hard nucleus cataracts. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1665–1670.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Can I, Takmaz T, Genç I (2008) Half-moon supracapsular nucleofractis phacoemulsification: safety, efficacy, and functionality. J Cataract Refract Surg 34(11):1958–1965.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.07.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wi J, Seo H, Lee JY, Nam DH (2016) Phacoemulsification using a chisel-shaped illuminator: enhanced depth trench, one-shot crack, and phaco cut. Eur J Ophthalmol 26:279–280.  https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000667 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lunberg B, Jonsson M, Behndig A (2005) Postoperative corneal swelling correlates strongly with the corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 139:1035–1041.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.200412.080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lhuillier L, Jeancolas AL, Renaudin L, Goetz C, Ameloot F, Premy S, Ouamara N, Perone JM (2017) Impact of ophthalmic surgeon experience on early postoperative central corneal thickness after cataract surgery. Cornea 36(5):541–545.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    López-Miguel A, Sanchidrián M, Fernández I, Holgueras A, Maldonado MJ (2017) Comparison of specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry before and after cataract surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255:387–392.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3537-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaup S, Shivalli S, Divyalakshmi KS, Arunachalam C, Varghese RC (2016) Central corneal thickness changes in bevel-up versus bevel-down phacoemulsification cataract surgery: study protocol for a randomised, triple-blind, parallel group trial. BMJ Open 6(9):e012024.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zheng T, Yang J, Xu J, He W, Lu Y (2016) Near-term analysis of corneal epithelial thickness after cataract surgery and its correlation with epithelial cell changes and visual acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:420–426.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.09.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Calabuig-Goena M, López-Miguel A, Marqués-Fernández V, Coco-Martín MB, Iglesias-Cortiñas D et al (2015) Early changes in corneal epithelial thickness after cataract surgery—pilot study. Curr Eye Res 41:311–317.  https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2015.101.4565 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G (2014) Corneal epithelial remodeling following cataract surgery: three-dimensional investigation with anterior-segment optical coherence tomography. J Refract Surg 30:348–353.  https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20140416-04 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G (2014) OCT-derived comparison of corneal thickness distribution and asymmetry differences between normal and keratoconic eyes. Cornea 33:1274–1281.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Calonge M, Diebol Y, Saez V, Enriquez de Salamanca A, Garcia-Vazquez C, Corrales RM et al (2004) Impression cytology of the ocular surface: a review. Exp Eye Res 78:457–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mclaren JW, Nau CB, Erie JC, Bourne WB (2004) Corneal thickness measurement by confocal microscopy, ultrasound, and scanning slit methods. Am J Ophthalmol 137:1011–1020.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.01.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moller-Pedersen T, Vogel M, Li HF, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV (1997) Quantification of stromal thinning, epithelial thickness and corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy using in vivo confocal microscopy. Ophthalmology 104:360–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prakash G, Agarwal A, Mazhari AI, Chari M, Kumar DA, Kumar G et al (2012) Reliability and reproducibility of assessment of corneal epithelial thickness by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:2580–2585.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8981 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Francoz M, Karamoko I, Baudouin C, Labbe A (2011) Ocular surface epithelial thickness evaluation with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:9116–9123.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-7988 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sedat Özmen
    • 1
  • Burçin Çakır
    • 2
    Email author
  • Nilgün Özkan Aksoy
    • 1
  • Emine Doğan
    • 1
  • Tural Babashli
    • 1
  • Gürsoy Alagöz
    • 1
  1. 1.Sakarya University Education and Research HospitalSakaryaTurkey
  2. 2.Eye ClinicSakarya University Education and Research HospitalSakaryaTurkey

Personalised recommendations