Skip to main content

Visual acuity and corneal higher-order aberrations after EX-PRESS or trabeculectomy, and the determination of associated factors that influence visual function

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated postoperative visual acuity and corneal higher-order aberrations following EX-PRESS or trabeculectomy.

Methods

Out of 56 eyes of 56 patients analyzed, 30 eyes were treated using trabeculectomy, while 26 eyes were treated with EX-PRESS. Visual acuity and corneal higher-order aberrations were analyzed in both groups before and at 2 weeks, 1, 2, and 3 months after the surgeries. Risk factors that could potentially influence corneal higher-order aberrations were evaluated.

Results

Significant reductions in the IOP were observed at 3 months after the surgery in both groups. Although a significant decrease in the visual acuity (logMAR) was observed at 2 weeks after the surgery in both groups, at 1 month after the surgeries, there were no significant differences found for the vision as compared to the baseline. At each study visit in the trabeculectomy group, significantly higher corneal higher-order aberrations compared to baseline were noted. In the EX-PRESS group, however, these aberrations were no longer significantly different from the baseline at month 2 (P = 0.36). Analysis of the risk factors indicated that hypotony could influence corneal higher-order aberrations after surgery.

Conclusions

Corneal higher-order aberrations were significantly increased at 1 month after EX-PRESS treatment, with levels returning to baseline by 2 months. After trabeculectomy, however, corneal higher-order aberrations remained significantly increased at 3 months after the procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Edmunds B, Thompson JR, Salmon JF, Wormald RP (2002) The national survey of trabeculectomy. III. Early and late complications. Eye (Lond) 16:297–303

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Francis BA, Hong B, Winarko J, Winarko J, Kawji S, Dustin L, Chopra V (2011) Vision loss and recovery after trabeculectomy: risk and associated risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol 129:1011–1017

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dahan E, Carmichael TR (2005) Implantation of a miniature glaucoma device under a scleral flap. J Glaucoma 14:98–102

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Maris PJ Jr, Ishida K, Netland PA (2007) Comparison of trabeculectomy with Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implanted under scleral flap. J Glaucoma 16:14–19

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Shaarawy T, Goldberg I, Fechtner R (2015) EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device: review of clinical experience and comparison with trabeculectomy. Surv Ophthalmol 60:327–345

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chalita MR, Chavala S, Xu M, Krueger RR (2004) Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography. Ophthalmology 111:447–453

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Oshika T, Okamoto C, Samejima T, Tokunaga T, Miyata K (2006) Contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations in normal human eyes. Ophthalmology 113:1807–1812

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Good TJ, Kahook MY (2011) Assessment of bleb morphologic features and postoperative outcomes after Ex-PRESS drainage device implantation versus trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 151:507–513

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Beltran-Agullo L, Trope GE, Jin Y, Wagschal LD, Jinapriya D, Buys YM (2015) Comparison of visual recovery following Ex-PRESS versus trabeculectomy: results of a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Glaucoma 24:181–186

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wagschal LD, Trope GE, Jinapriya D, Jin YP, Buys YM (2015) Prospective randomized study comparing Ex-PRESS to trabeculectomy: 1-year results. J Glaucoma 24:624–629

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Netland PA, Sarkisian SR, Moster MR, Ahmed IK, Condon G, Salim S, Sherwood MB, Siegfried CJ (2014) Randomized, prospective, comparative trial of EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device versus trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 157:433–440

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fukuoka S, Amano S, Honda N, Mimura T, Usui T, Araie M (2011) Effect of trabeculectomy on ocular and corneal higher order aberrations. Jpn J Ophthalmol 55:460–466

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosen WJ, Mannis MJ, Brandt JD (1992) The effect of trabeculectomy on corneal topography. Ophthalmic Surg 23:395–398

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dietze PJ, Oram O, Kohnen T, Feldman RM, Koch DD, Gross RL (1997) Visual function following trabeculectomy: effect on corneal topography and contrast sensitivity. J Glaucoma 6:99–103

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart WC, Shields MB (1988) Management of anterior chamber depth after trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 106:41–44

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cashwell LF, Martin CA (1999) Axial length decrease accompanying successful glaucoma filtration surgery. Ophthalmology 106:2307–2311

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Francis BA, Wang M, Lei H, Du LT, Minckler DS, Green RL, Roland C (2005) Changes in axial length following trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage device surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 89:17–20

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. de Castro LE, Sandoval HP, Bartholomew LR, Vroman DT, Solomon KD (2007) High-order aberrations and preoperative associated factors. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85:106–110

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (26462689).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuyuki Hirooka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kobayashi, N., Hirooka, K., Nitta, E. et al. Visual acuity and corneal higher-order aberrations after EX-PRESS or trabeculectomy, and the determination of associated factors that influence visual function. Int Ophthalmol 38, 1969–1976 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0685-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0685-1

Keywords

  • Trabeculectomy
  • EX-PRESS
  • Higher-order aberrations
  • Visual acuity