Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of visual outcomes and reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the visual acuity outcomes, contrast sensitivity function (CS) and reading ability in patients with bilateral multifocal intraocular lenses and patients with bilateral monofocal lenses.

Setting

Vizyon Eye Center, Denizli, Turkey.

Design

Comparative case series.

Methods

Consecutive bilateral cataract patients having implantation of Acriva Reviol MFM 611 multifocal IOLs (Group A) or Acriva BB UD 613 monofocal IOLs (Group B) were included. Parameters analyzed 6 months postoperatively included monocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), binocular uncorrected intermediate (UIVA), binocular uncorrected near (UNVA), CS and bilateral reading performance using MN Read.

Results

The study evaluated 42 eyes in Group A and 40 eyes in Group B. There were no statistically significant differences in UDVA between two groups postoperatively (p = .39). Binocular UIVA and binocular UNVA are better in Group A (p = .00, p = .00). Under photopic and scotopic conditions, contrast sensitivity results were decreased in Group A, especially at high spatial frequencies. No statistically difference were found in reading acuity, critical print size and maximum reading speed between two groups (p = .57, p = .62, p = .22).

Conclusions

This study concludes that multifocal lenses are reliable and efficient replacements for reading glasses since they significantly improve the vision for near or intermediate distance activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SGK Rehberi (2012) Social security system guide 2012, Turkey

  2. Legge GE, Ross JA, Luebker A, Lamays JM (1989) Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The minnesota low-vision reading test. Optom Vis Sci 66:843–853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Virgili G, Cordaro C, Bigoni A, Crovato S, Cecchini P, Menchini U (2004) Reading acuity in children: evaluation and reliability using MNREAD charts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3349–3354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Heatley CJ, Spalton DJ, Hancox J, Kumar A, Marshall J (2005) Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol 140:207–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta N, Wolffsohn JSW, Naroo SA (2009) Comparison of near visual acuity and reading metrics in presbyopia correction. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1401–1409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ito M, Shimizu K (2009) Reading ability with pseudophakic monovision and with refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1501–1504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Santhiago MR, Netto MV, Espindola RF, Mazurek MG, Gomes BAF, Parede TRR, Harooni H, Kara-Junior N (2010) Comparison of reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with +3.00 or +4.00 diopter addition. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1874–1879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alio JL, Grabner G, Plaza-Puche AB, Rasp M, Pinero DP, Seyeddain O, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Ayala MJ, Moreu R, Hohensinn M, Riha W, Dexl A (2011) Postoperative bilateral reading performance with 4 intraocular lens models: six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:842–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Pinero DP, Amparo F, Jimenez R, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Javaloy J, Pongo V (2011) Optical analysis, reading performance, and quality-of-life evaluation after implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:27–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Gupta N, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Shah S (2012) Development of a questionnaire to assess the relative subjective benefits of presbyopia correction. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:74–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cillino G, Casuccio A, Pasti M, Bono V, Mencucci R, Cillino S (2014) Working-age cataract patients: visual results, reading performance, and quality of life with three diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 121:34–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Can I, Ceran BB, Soyugelen G, Takmaz T (2012) Comparison of clinical outcomes with 2 small-incision diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:60–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baykara M, Akova YA, Arslan OS, Cinhuseyinoğlu N, Takmaz T, Gucukoğlu A, Usta YB (2015) Visual outcomes at 12 months in patients following implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmol Ther 4(1):21–32. doi:10.1007/s40123-015-0032-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang M, Corpuz CCC, Fujiwara M, Tomita M (2015) Visual and optical performances of multifocal intraocular lenses with three different near additions: 6-months follow-up. Open Ophthalmol J 9:1–7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Akçay L, Tutas Günaydın N, Sayman I, Dogan O (2010) Comparison of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity between aspheric monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. In: Poster presented at ESCRS, Paris

  16. Cochener B, Lafuma A, Khoshnood B, Courouve L, Berdeaux G (2011) Comparison of outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses : a meta-analysis. Clin Ophthalmol 5:45–55

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Vries NE, Webers CAB, Verbakel F, Brabander J, Berendschot TT, Cheng YYY, Doors M, Nuijts RMMA (2010) Visual outcome and patient satisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: aspheric versus spherical design. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1897–1904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Petermeier K, Messias A, Gekeler F, Szurman P (2011) Effect of +3.00 diopter and +4.00 diopter additions in multifocal intraocular lenses an defocus profiles, patient satisfaction, and contrast sensitivity. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:720–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim JS, Jung JW, Lee JM, Seo KY, Kim EK, Kim T (2015) Clinical outcomes following implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses with varying add powers. Am J Ophthalmol 160:702–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alio JL, Vega-Estrada A, Plaza-Puche AB (2015) Clinical outcomes with a new microincisional diffractive multifocal IOL. Eye Vision 2:2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Alio JL, Pinero DP, Plaza-Puche AB, Chan MJR (2011) Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and new-generation multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:241–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang F, Sugar A, Jacobsen G, Collins M (2011) Visual function and patient satisfaction: comparison between bilateral diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses and monovision pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:446–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alio JL, Pinero DP, Plaza-Puche AB (2010) Visual outcomes and optical performance with a monofocal intraocular lens and new-generation single-optic accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1656–1664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Pinero DP, Amparo F, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Ayala MJ (2011) Quality of life evaluation after implantation of 2 multifocal intraocular lens models and a monofocal model. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:638–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Prieto JC, Bautista MJ (2010) Visual outcomes after implantation of a refractive multifocal intraocular lens with a +3.00 D addition. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1508–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ye Pan-Pan, Li Xia, Yao Ke (2013) Visual outcome and optical quality after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal, aspheric monofocal and spherical monofocal intraocular lenses: a prospective comparison. Int J Ophthalmol 6(3):300–306

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Mesci C, Erbil H, Özdöker L, Karakurt Y, Bilge AD (2010) Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function after accommodative and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Eur J Ophthalmol 20:90–1002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Montes-Mico R, Alio JL (2003) Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:703–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Souza CE, Muccioli C, Soriano ES et al (2006) Visual performance of Acrysof Restor apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial. Am J Ophthalmol 141:827–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Netto MV, Ambrosio R Jr, Wilson SE (2004) Pupil size in refractive surgery candidates. J Refract Surg 20:337–342

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Özge Güngör Akkuş.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akkuş, Ö.G., Petriçli, I.S. Comparison of visual outcomes and reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses. Int Ophthalmol 38, 1011–1019 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0552-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0552-0

Keywords

Navigation