Abstract
Purpose
To compare the visual acuity outcomes, contrast sensitivity function (CS) and reading ability in patients with bilateral multifocal intraocular lenses and patients with bilateral monofocal lenses.
Setting
Vizyon Eye Center, Denizli, Turkey.
Design
Comparative case series.
Methods
Consecutive bilateral cataract patients having implantation of Acriva Reviol MFM 611 multifocal IOLs (Group A) or Acriva BB UD 613 monofocal IOLs (Group B) were included. Parameters analyzed 6 months postoperatively included monocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), binocular uncorrected intermediate (UIVA), binocular uncorrected near (UNVA), CS and bilateral reading performance using MN Read.
Results
The study evaluated 42 eyes in Group A and 40 eyes in Group B. There were no statistically significant differences in UDVA between two groups postoperatively (p = .39). Binocular UIVA and binocular UNVA are better in Group A (p = .00, p = .00). Under photopic and scotopic conditions, contrast sensitivity results were decreased in Group A, especially at high spatial frequencies. No statistically difference were found in reading acuity, critical print size and maximum reading speed between two groups (p = .57, p = .62, p = .22).
Conclusions
This study concludes that multifocal lenses are reliable and efficient replacements for reading glasses since they significantly improve the vision for near or intermediate distance activities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
SGK Rehberi (2012) Social security system guide 2012, Turkey
Legge GE, Ross JA, Luebker A, Lamays JM (1989) Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The minnesota low-vision reading test. Optom Vis Sci 66:843–853
Virgili G, Cordaro C, Bigoni A, Crovato S, Cecchini P, Menchini U (2004) Reading acuity in children: evaluation and reliability using MNREAD charts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3349–3354
Heatley CJ, Spalton DJ, Hancox J, Kumar A, Marshall J (2005) Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol 140:207–213
Gupta N, Wolffsohn JSW, Naroo SA (2009) Comparison of near visual acuity and reading metrics in presbyopia correction. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1401–1409
Ito M, Shimizu K (2009) Reading ability with pseudophakic monovision and with refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1501–1504
Santhiago MR, Netto MV, Espindola RF, Mazurek MG, Gomes BAF, Parede TRR, Harooni H, Kara-Junior N (2010) Comparison of reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with +3.00 or +4.00 diopter addition. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1874–1879
Alio JL, Grabner G, Plaza-Puche AB, Rasp M, Pinero DP, Seyeddain O, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Ayala MJ, Moreu R, Hohensinn M, Riha W, Dexl A (2011) Postoperative bilateral reading performance with 4 intraocular lens models: six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:842–852
Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Pinero DP, Amparo F, Jimenez R, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Javaloy J, Pongo V (2011) Optical analysis, reading performance, and quality-of-life evaluation after implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:27–37
Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Gupta N, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Shah S (2012) Development of a questionnaire to assess the relative subjective benefits of presbyopia correction. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:74–79
Cillino G, Casuccio A, Pasti M, Bono V, Mencucci R, Cillino S (2014) Working-age cataract patients: visual results, reading performance, and quality of life with three diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 121:34–44
Can I, Ceran BB, Soyugelen G, Takmaz T (2012) Comparison of clinical outcomes with 2 small-incision diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:60–67
Baykara M, Akova YA, Arslan OS, Cinhuseyinoğlu N, Takmaz T, Gucukoğlu A, Usta YB (2015) Visual outcomes at 12 months in patients following implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmol Ther 4(1):21–32. doi:10.1007/s40123-015-0032-4
Wang M, Corpuz CCC, Fujiwara M, Tomita M (2015) Visual and optical performances of multifocal intraocular lenses with three different near additions: 6-months follow-up. Open Ophthalmol J 9:1–7
Akçay L, Tutas Günaydın N, Sayman I, Dogan O (2010) Comparison of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity between aspheric monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. In: Poster presented at ESCRS, Paris
Cochener B, Lafuma A, Khoshnood B, Courouve L, Berdeaux G (2011) Comparison of outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses : a meta-analysis. Clin Ophthalmol 5:45–55
Vries NE, Webers CAB, Verbakel F, Brabander J, Berendschot TT, Cheng YYY, Doors M, Nuijts RMMA (2010) Visual outcome and patient satisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: aspheric versus spherical design. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1897–1904
Petermeier K, Messias A, Gekeler F, Szurman P (2011) Effect of +3.00 diopter and +4.00 diopter additions in multifocal intraocular lenses an defocus profiles, patient satisfaction, and contrast sensitivity. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:720–726
Kim JS, Jung JW, Lee JM, Seo KY, Kim EK, Kim T (2015) Clinical outcomes following implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses with varying add powers. Am J Ophthalmol 160:702–709
Alio JL, Vega-Estrada A, Plaza-Puche AB (2015) Clinical outcomes with a new microincisional diffractive multifocal IOL. Eye Vision 2:2
Alio JL, Pinero DP, Plaza-Puche AB, Chan MJR (2011) Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and new-generation multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:241–250
Zhang F, Sugar A, Jacobsen G, Collins M (2011) Visual function and patient satisfaction: comparison between bilateral diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses and monovision pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:446–453
Alio JL, Pinero DP, Plaza-Puche AB (2010) Visual outcomes and optical performance with a monofocal intraocular lens and new-generation single-optic accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1656–1664
Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Pinero DP, Amparo F, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Ayala MJ (2011) Quality of life evaluation after implantation of 2 multifocal intraocular lens models and a monofocal model. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:638–648
Prieto JC, Bautista MJ (2010) Visual outcomes after implantation of a refractive multifocal intraocular lens with a +3.00 D addition. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1508–1516
Ye Pan-Pan, Li Xia, Yao Ke (2013) Visual outcome and optical quality after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal, aspheric monofocal and spherical monofocal intraocular lenses: a prospective comparison. Int J Ophthalmol 6(3):300–306
Mesci C, Erbil H, Özdöker L, Karakurt Y, Bilge AD (2010) Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function after accommodative and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Eur J Ophthalmol 20:90–1002
Montes-Mico R, Alio JL (2003) Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:703–711
Souza CE, Muccioli C, Soriano ES et al (2006) Visual performance of Acrysof Restor apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial. Am J Ophthalmol 141:827–832
Netto MV, Ambrosio R Jr, Wilson SE (2004) Pupil size in refractive surgery candidates. J Refract Surg 20:337–342
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akkuş, Ö.G., Petriçli, I.S. Comparison of visual outcomes and reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses. Int Ophthalmol 38, 1011–1019 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0552-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0552-0