Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of across-pupil sutures on the optical quality of intraocular lenses

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In cases of pupillary capture after previous transscleral fixation of an intraocular lens (IOL), an across-pupil suture technique is sometimes used to stabilize the IOL. We investigated the optical effects of 10-0 polypropylene sutures placed across the pupil.

Methods

Optical performance was evaluated using the optical bench metrology system, and a single-piece IOL was used in an optical bench system consisting of a model eye, a high-resolution Hartmann–Shack wave front sensor, and an image capturing device with 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 4.5 mm apertures with distance focus. To simulate across-pupil sutures, two 10-0 polypropylene sutures were placed 2 mm apart across the pupil. The focus image, spherical aberration, and image quality were measured and compared with and without sutures.

Results

When pupil size increased, spherical aberration increased, irrespective of sutures. No difference was found in spherical aberration with and without sutures, and image qualities at 17.6 and 35.2 cycles per degree were not affected by the across-pupil sutures.

Conclusions

The differences in optical quality using across-pupil 10-0 polypropylene sutures were clinically negligible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jin GJ, Crandall AS, Jones JJ (2005) Changing indications for and improving outcomes of intraocular lens exchange. Am J Ophthalmol 140:688–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernandez-Buenaga R, Alio JL, Perez-Ardoy AL et al (2013) Late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation requiring explantation: risk factors and outcomes. Eye 27:795–801

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Masket S, Fram NR (2013) Safety-basket suture for management of malpositioned posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:1633–1635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jurgens I, Rey A (2015) Simple technique to treat pupillary capture after transscleral fixation of intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:14–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bading G, Hillenkamp J, Sachs HG et al (2007) Long-term safety and functional outcome of combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral-fixated sutured posterior chamber lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol 144:371–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Higashide T, Shimizu F, Nishimura A, Sugiyama K (2009) Anterior segment optical coherence tomography findings of reverse pupillary block after scleral-fixated sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1540–1547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nagamoto S, Kohzuka T, Nagamoto T (1998) Pupillary block after pupillary capture of an AcrySof intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:1271–1274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Piers PA, Norrby NE, Mester U (2004) Eye models for the prediction of contrast vision in patients with new intraocular lens designs. Opt Lett 29:733–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lang AJ, Lakshminarayanan V, Portney V (1993) Phenomenological model for interpreting the clinical significance of the in vitro optical transfer function. J Opt Soc Am A: 10:1600–1610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawamorita T, Uozato H, Aizawa D et al (2009) Optical performance in rezoom and array multifocal intraocular lenses in vitro. J Refract Surg 25:467–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller JM, Anwaruddin R, Straub J, Schwiegerling J (2002) Higher order aberrations in normal, dilated, intraocular lens, and laser in situ keratomileusis corneas. J Refract Surg 18:S579–S583

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim MJ, Yoo YS, Joo CK, Yoon G (2015) Evaluation of optical performance of 4 aspheric toric intraocular lenses using an optical bench system: influence of pupil size, decentration, and rotation. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:2274–2282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shiratani T, Shimizu K, Fujisawa K et al (2008) Crystalline lens changes in porcine eyes with implanted phakic IOL (ICL) with a central hole. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246:719–728

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Uozato H, Shimizu K, Kawamorita T, Ohmoto F (2011) Modulation transfer function of intraocular collamer lens with a central artificial hole. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:1081–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2016R1C1B2012933).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Choun-Ki Joo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rho, C.R., Kim, MJ. & Joo, CK. Influence of across-pupil sutures on the optical quality of intraocular lenses. Int Ophthalmol 38, 909–915 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0441-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0441-y

Keywords

Navigation