Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Visual consequences of electronic reader use: a pilot study

  • Case Report
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

With the increasing prevalence of electronic readers (e-readers) for vocational and professional uses, it is important to discover if there are visual consequences in the use of these products. There are no studies in the literature quantifying the incidence or severity of eyestrain, nor are there clinical characteristics that may predispose to these symptoms with e-reader use.

Purpose

The primary objective of this pilot study was to assess the degree of eyestrain associated with e-reader use compared to traditional paper format. The secondary outcomes of this study were to assess the rate of eyestrain associated with e-reader use and identify any clinical characteristics that may be associated with the development of eyestrain.

Methods

Forty-four students were randomly assigned to study (e-reader iPAD) and control (print) groups. Participant posture, luminosity of the room, and reading distance from reading device were measured during a 1-h session for both groups. At the end of the session, questionnaires were administered to determine symptoms.

Results

Significantly higher rates of eyestrain (p = 0.008) and irritation (p = 0.011) were found among the iPAD study group as compared to the print ‘control’ group. The study group was also 4.9 times more likely to report severe eyestrain (95 % CI [1.4, 16.9]). No clinical characteristics predisposing to eyestrain could be identified.

Conclusions

These findings conclude that reading on e-readers may induce increased levels of irritation and eyestrain. Predisposing factors, etiology, and potential remedial interventions remain to be determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Center PR. Tablet ownership over time. http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/01/16/e-reading-rises-as-device-ownership-jumps/e-readers4/2014

  2. Agarwal S, Goel D, Sharma A (2013) Evaluation of the factors which contribute to the ocular complaints in computer users. J Clin Diagn Res 7(2):331–335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Council TV. screens, phones, tables and more: keeping your eyes safe in a digital age

  4. Blehm C, Vishnu S, Khattak A et al (2005) Computer vision syndrome: a review. Surv Ophthalmol 50(3):253–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sheedy JE (1992) Vision problems at video display terminals: a survey of optometrists. J Am Optom Assoc 63(10):687–692

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thorud HM, Helland M, Aaras A et al (2012) Eye-related pain induced by visually demanding computer work. Optom Vis Sci 89(4):E452–E464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdelaziz, Mabrouk M, Fahim SA, Mousa DB, Gaya BI (2009) Effects of computer use on visual acuity and colour vision among computer workers in Zaria. Eur J Sci Res 35(1):99–105

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chu C, Rosenfield M, Portello JK et al (2011) A comparison of symptoms after viewing text on a computer screen and hardcopy. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 31(1):29–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Collins MJ BK, et al.. Visual discomfort and VDTs. National Occupational Health and Safety Commission 1988:1-37

  10. Dain SJ, McCarthy AK, Chan-Ling T (1988) Symptoms in VDU operators. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 65(3):162–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Costanza MA (1994) Visual and ocular symptoms related to the use of video display terminals. J Behav Optom 5:31–36

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bhanderi DJ, Choudhary S, Doshi VG (2008) A community-based study of asthenopia in computer operators. Indian J Ophthalmol 56(1):51–55

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakaishi H, Yamada Y (1999) Abnormal tear dynamics and symptoms of eyestrain in operators of visual display terminals. Occup Environ Med 56(1):6–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Siegenthaler E, Bochud Y, Bergamin P, Wurtz P (2012) Reading on LCD vs e-Ink displays: effects on fatigue and visual strain. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 32(5):367–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by grants from the University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Department of Ophthamology and the Foundation Fighting Blindness. Partial funding for this project was provided by grant UL1 TR000153 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through the Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Research Design Unit of University of California, Irvine Institute for Clinical Translational Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert W. Crow.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest and have no proprietary interest in any of the materials mentioned in this article.

Additional information

Marlon M. Maducdoc and Asghar Haider are contributed equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maducdoc, M.M., Haider, A., Nalbandian, A. et al. Visual consequences of electronic reader use: a pilot study. Int Ophthalmol 37, 433–439 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0281-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0281-9

Keywords

Navigation