Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus using the VF-14 questionnaire

  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To assess the visual function of patients with keratoconus who underwent penetrating keratoplasty with the use of the VF-14 questionnaire. Fourteen patients (9 male and 5 female) with a mean age of 38 years (SD 13.59) participated in the study. All patients had keratoconus, confirmed by corneal topography, and all had previously undergone penetrating keratoplasty in one eye. Their mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) binocularly was 0.185 (SD 0.077) LogMAR. None of the grafted eyes had a BCVA <0.300 LogMAR. Fourteen healthy volunteers, age- and sex-matched, also participated in the study as control subjects. The VF-14 questionnaire was used to evaluate the effect of the ocular status in the daily life activities of the patients. The mean VF-14 result for the grafted patients with keratoconus was 62.37% (SD 22.60) and for the control group it was 100% (P < 0.001). There was only a weak correlation between the VF-14 score and the binocular BCVA (r = −0.394, P = 0.163). The mean VF-14 result in grafted patients with keratoconus is indicative of low functional ability despite the satisfactory postoperative BCVA. The absence of a significant correlation between the VF-14 score and the mean BCVA indicates that the low functional visual ability in these patients is probably associated more with the ‘perceived by themselves’ difficulty due to their ophthalmological condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rubin GS, Adamsons IA, Stark WJ (1993) Comparison of acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare before and after cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 111:56–61

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodis-Wollner I (1980) Detection of visual defects using the contrast sensitivity function. Int Ophthalmol Clin 20:135–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Elliot DB, Hurst MA, Weatherill J (1990) Comparing clinical tests of visual function in cataract with the patient’s perceived visual disability. Eye 4:712–717

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mannis MJ, Zadnik K, Johnson CA (1984) The effect of penetrating keratoplasty on contrast sensitivity in keratoconus. Arch Ophthalmol 102:1513–1516

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernth-Petersen P (1981) Visual functioning in cataract patients: methods of measuring and results. Acta Ophthalmol 59:198–205

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hess RF, Carney LG (1979) Vision through an abnormal cornea: a pilot study of the relationship between visual loss from corneal distortion, corneal edema, keratoconus, and some allied pathology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18:476–483

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mannis MJ, Zadnik K, Johnson CA et al (1987) Contrast sensitivity after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 105:1220–1223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Koenig SB, McDermott ML, Hyndiuk RA (1989) Penetrating keratoplasty and intraocular lens exchange for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy associated with a closed-loop anterior chamber intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol 108:43–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, Lawrence MG, Cook EF, Dailey R et al (1992) Development of the ‘activities of daily vision scale’. A measure of visual functional status. Med Care 30:1111–1126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brémond-Gignac D, Tixier J, Missotten T, Laroche L, Beresniak A (1999) Evaluation of the quality of life in ophthalmology. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 97:473–511

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fujita A, Hieda O, Nakajima N, Kinoshita S (2005) The VF-14 index of functional visual impairment in patients with corneal disease treated by phototherapeutic keratectomy. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 109:736–740

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Musch DC, Farjo AA, Meyer RF, Waldo MN, Janz NK (1997) Assessment of health-related quality of life after corneal transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol 124:1–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boisjoly H, Gresset J, Charest M, Fontaine N, Brunette I, Lefranc M et al (2002) The VF-14 index of visual function in recipients of a corneal graft: a 2-year follow-up study. Am J Ophthalmol 134:166–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brahma A, Ennis F, Harper R, Ridgway A, Tullo A (2000) Visual function after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a prospective longitudinal evaluation. Br J Ophthalmol 84:60–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Scott IU, Smiddy WE, Schiffman J, Feuer WJ, Pappas CJ (1999) Quality of life of low-vision patients and the impact of low-vision services. Am J Ophthalmol 128:54–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Kanonidou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ziakas, N., Kanonidou, E., Mikropoulos, D. et al. The impact of penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus using the VF-14 questionnaire. Int Ophthalmol 31, 89–92 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-010-9414-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-010-9414-8

Keywords

Navigation