Abstract
International peer-reviewed publications form the basis of evidence-based medicine and are one of the main indicators of ophthalmology research activity. This paper examines the origins of such articles in relation to geographical location, population demographics and economic research profiles. Publications from five ophthalmology journals over 5 years were analysed using the Medline/Pubmed search engine. Country of origin was ascertained based on the address of the corresponding author. Worldwide ophthalmology research output was analysed in relation to population demographics and research expenditure. In total, 7,754 articles from 67 countries from 2002 to 2006 were analysed. The overall number of articles published increased by over 29% during this period. The United States (US) produced the greatest number of articles. Singapore produced the most publications per 106 population. There was a relationship between gross domestic product (GDP) greater than $20,000 and population-adjusted output. The US followed by the United Kingdom and Japan were the greatest gross contributors. Population-adjusted figures revealed that Singapore, Iceland and Australia were the most prolific nations. There was a relationship between GDP and the top-ranked population-adjusted countries. The top 10 most productive population-adjusted countries spend relatively more on research and development than the top 10 gross contributors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ISI Web of Knowledge http://isiwebofknowledge.com/
Central Intelligence agency The World Factbook https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2001rank.html
United Nations Organisation for Education Science and Culture (UNESCO) Institute for Statistics database http://172.30.252.10:1812/servlet/com.trend.iwss.user.servlet.sendfile?downloadfile=LgIRE15135-280907008-288-document.aspx
King DA (2004) The scientific impact of nations. What different countries get for their research spending. Nature 430:311–316. doi:10.1038/430311a
Van Rossum M, Bosker BH, Pierik EGJM, Verheyen CCPM (2007) Geographic origin of publications in surgical journals. Br J Surg 94:244–247. doi:10.1002/bjs.5571
Boldt J, Maleck W, Koettner KP (1999) Which countries publish in important anesthesia and critical care journals? Anesth Analg 88(5):1175–1180. doi:10.1097/00000539-199905000-00038
Rippon I, Lewison G, Partridge MR (2005) Research outputs in respiratory medicine. Thorax 60(1):63–67. doi:10.1136/thx.2004.031229
Davis M, Wilson CS (2003) Research contributions in ophthalmology: Australia’s productivity. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 31(4):286–293. doi:10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00663.x
Pon JA, Carroll SC, McGhee CN (2004) Analysis of New Zealand’s research productivity in ophthalmology and vision science: 1993–2002. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 32(6):607–613. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2004.00934.x
Mandal K, Adams W, Fraser S (2004) The contribution to ophthalmic literature from different regions of the world. Int Ophthalmol 25(3):181–184. doi:10.1007/s10792-004-1959-y
Rahman M, Fukui T (2003) Biomedical publication-global profile and trend. Public Health 117(4):274–280. doi:10.1016/S0033-3506(03)00068-4
Man JP, Weinauf JG, Tsang M, Sin DD (2004) Why do some countries publish more than others? An international comparison of research funding, English proficiency and publication output in highly ranked medical journals. Eur J Epidemiol 19(8):811–817. doi:10.1023/B:EJEP.0000036571.00320.b8
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Drs. Thomas Crotty and Barry Maguire for their contributions to this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guerin, M.B., Flynn, T.H., Brady, J. et al. Worldwide geographical distribution of ophthalmology publications. Int Ophthalmol 29, 511–516 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-008-9278-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-008-9278-3