Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spectrum of Behçet’s disease in the Indian population

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation is to study the clinical profile of Behçet’s disease in the Indian population as seen in a tertiary referral uveitis clinic. A retrospective non-comparative case series was used. The records of all of the patients seen in our uveitis clinic between January 1990 and December 2006 were screened and patients with a diagnosis of Behçet’s disease were enrolled. The diagnosis was based on the Japanese diagnostic criteria and patients were classified into complete, incomplete, suspected, and possible Behçet’s disease. Information on the patient’s demographic characteristics, ocular and systemic clinical features, complications, investigation results, management protocols, and visual outcome was collected. The records of 4,214 uveitis clinic patients were screened and 53 patients (1.25%) of Behçet’s disease were identified. These included 39 males and 14 females (2.8:1), with a mean age of 27.6 years (range 10–51 years). Fifty (94.3%) of these patients were of either complete or incomplete Behçet’s disease. Ocular involvement was the most common manifestation (49 patients, 92.4%), followed by oral ulcers (88.7%), genital ulcers (61.2%), and skin involvement (28.3%). Panuveitis (57.1%) was the most common ocular presentation, followed by posterior (26.5%) and anterior uveitis (16.3%). More than 95% of the patients required oral steroids, while additional immunosuppressants were used in nearly 53% of the patients. The common complications observed included complicated cataract (57% of eyes), followed by cystoid macular edema (55.1%), occlusive vasculitis (44.8%), and optic atrophy (26.5%). Nearly 36% of the eyes maintained 6/12 or better vision, while 38% of the eyes were less than 6/60 after a mean follow-up period of 4.9 years (range 2–16 years). Behçet’s disease, although rare among Indians, commonly manifests with ocular involvement as non-granulomatous panuveitis with a high incidence of complications and unfavorable visual outcome in nearly one-third of the cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sakane T, Takeno M, Suzuki N, Inaba G (1999) Behçet’s disease. N Engl J Med 341:1284–1291. doi:10.1056/NEJM199910213411707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Michelson JB, Chisari FV (1982) Behçet’s disease. Surv Ophthalmol 26:190–203. doi:10.1016/0039-6257(82)90079-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Azizlerli G, Köse AA, Sarica R, Gül A, Tutkun IT, Kulaç M, Tunç R, Urgancioğlu M, Dişçi R (2003) Prevalence of Behçet’s disease in Istanbul, Turkey. Int J Dermatol 42:803–806. doi:10.1046/j.1365-4362.2003.01893.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mishima S, Masuda K, Izawa Y, Mochizuki M, Namba K (1979) Behçet’s disease in Japan: ophthalmologic aspects. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 77:225–279

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mizushima Y, Inaba G, Mimura Y, et al Guide for the diagnosis of Behçet’s disease. Report of Behçet’s Disease Research Committee, Japan 1987: Ministry of Health and Welfare, pp 8–17

  6. International Study Group for Behçet’s Disease (1990) Criteria for diagnosis of Behçet’s disease. Lancet 335:1078–1080

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rohatgi J, Singal A (2003) Ocular manifestations of Behçet’s disease in Indian patients. Indian J Ophthalmol 51:309–313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kunjuraman G, Joseph PP, Phillip J (1980) Behçet’s syndrome (a rare and poorly understood entity) (a report of three cases with review of literature). J Assoc Physicians India 28:95–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh RR, Malaviya AN (1988) Behçet’s syndrome in north India. J Assoc Physicians India 36:238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pande I, Uppal SS, Kailash S, Kumar A, Malaviya AN (1995) Behçet’s disease in India: a clinical, immunological, immunogenetic and outcome study. Br J Rheumatol 34:825–830. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/34.9.825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehra NK, Taneja V, Kailash S, Raizada N, Vaidya MC (1986) Distribution of HLA antigens in a sample of the North Indian Hindu population. Tissue Antigens 27:64–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yazici H, Akokan G, Yalçin B, Müftüoğlu A (1977) The high prevalence of HLA-B5 in Behçet’s disease. Clin Exp Immunol 30:259–261

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oshima Y, Shimizu T, Yokohari R, Matsumoto T, Kano K, Kagami T, Nagaya H (1963) Clinical studies on Behçet’s syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 22:36–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Evereklioglu C (2005) Current concepts in the etiology and treatment of Behçet disease. Surv Ophthalmol 50:297–350. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.04.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tugal-Tutkun I, Onal S, Altan-Yaycioglu R, Huseyin Altunbas H, Urgancioglu M (2004) Uveitis in Behçet disease: an analysis of 880 patients. Am J Ophthalmol 138:373–380. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.03.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang P, Fang W, Meng Q, Ren Y, Xing L, Kijlstra A (2008) Clinical features of Chinese patients with Behçet’s disease. Ophthalmology 115:312–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muhaya M, Lightman S, Ikeda E, Mochizuki M, Shaer B, McCluskey P, Towler HM (2000) Behçet’s disease in Japan and in Great Britain: a comparative study. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 8:141–148. doi:10.1076/0927-3948(200009)8:3;1-K;FT141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ambresin A, Tran T, Spertini F, Herbort CP (2002) Behçet’s disease in Western Switzerland: epidemiology and analysis of ocular involvement. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 10:53–63. doi:10.1076/ocii.10.1.53.10326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amod Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sachdev, N., Kapali, N., Singh, R. et al. Spectrum of Behçet’s disease in the Indian population. Int Ophthalmol 29, 495–501 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-008-9273-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-008-9273-8

Keywords

Navigation