Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A randomized prospective study comparing trabeculectomy with and without the use of a new removable suture

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this prospective study is to verify, in terms of both early postoperative complications and intraocular pressure (IOP) outcomes, the performance of a scleral flap removable suture. Materials and Methods Sixty-six patients that underwent trabeculectomy were randomly divided into two groups: in the first group (group A, 33 eyes) a standard fornix-based trabeculectomy was performed by using a conjunctival chain suture. In the second group (group B, 33 eyes) the same technique was performed with the additional employment of a new removable suture to the scleral flap. The patients were followed-up for 12 months. Results After 1 year the mean IOP was 16.58 mmHg (±3.73 mmHg) in group A, and 16.12 mmHg (±4.21 mmHg) in group B; statistical analysis did not show significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.19). Early postoperative hypotony and shallowing of the anterior chamber were significantly more frequent after standard trabeculectomy than after trabeculectomy using the removable suture (P < 0.02). Conclusions The employment of a fornix-based conjunctival chain suture for the flap allows the use of the removable scleral flap suture, which has proved very effective in preventing insufficient flap resistance with aqueous overdrainage and hypotony, and which is also easy to apply and to remove. Compared with standard trabeculectomy, this device has proved to have similar IOP-lowering efficacy, together with a lower rate of early postoperative complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Graph 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shirakashi M, Iwata K, Sawaguchi AS et al (1993) Intraocular pressure-dependent progression of visual field loss in advanced primary open angle glaucoma: a 15-years follow-up. Ophthalmologica 207:1–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chauhan BC, Drance SM (1992) The relationship between intraocular pressure and visual field progression in glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 230:521–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jay JL, Murray SB (1988) Early trabeculectomy versus conventional management in primary open-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 72:881–889

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Migdal C, Gregory W, Hitchings RA (1994) Long-term functional outcome after early surgery compared with laser and medicine in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 101:1651–1657

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanchez E, Schnyder CC, Sickenberg M, Chiou AG, Hediguer SE, Mermoud A (1996–1997) Deep sclerectomy: results with and without collagen implant. Int Ophthalmol 20:157–162

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stegmann R, Pienaar A, Miller D (1999) Viscocanalostomy for open-angle glaucoma in black African patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:316–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson MR, Mendis U, Paliwal A, Haynatzka V (2003) Long-term follow-up of primary glaucoma surgery with Ahmed glaucoma valve implant versus trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 136:464–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wamsley S, Moster MR, Rai S, Alvim HS, Fontanarosa J (2004) Results of the use of the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma implant in technicallychallenging, advanced glaucoma cases: a clinical pilot study. Am J Ophthalmol 138(6):1049–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cairns JE (1972) Trabeculectomy: symposium: microsurgery of the out-flow channels. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 76:384–388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Watson P (1970) Trabeculectomy—a modified ab externo tecnique. Ann Ohpthalmol 2:199

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zohdy GA, Lukaris A, Rogers ZA, Hill A, Roberts-Harry TJ (1998–1999) Early results of punch trabeculectomy. Int Ophthalmol 22(4):253–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khaw PT (2001) Advances in glaucoma surgery: evolution of antimetabolite adjunctive therapy. J Glaucoma 10(5 Suppl 1):S81–4 Review

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones E, Clarke J, Khaw PT (2005) Recent advances in trabeculectomy technique. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16:107–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Caporossi A, Casprini F, Tosi GM, Balestrazzi An (1999) Long term results of combined 1-way phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation and trabeculectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 25(12):1641–1645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stalmans I, Gillis A, Lafaut A-S, Zeyen T (2006) Safe trabeculectomy technique: long term outcome. Br J Ophthalmol 90:44–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bannit M, Juzych MS, Chopra V et al (2006) The effect of the timing of scleral flap suture release on the safety and long-term success of phacotrabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 141(4):742–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ashraff NN, Wells AP (2005) Transconjunctival suture adjiustment for initial intraocular pressure control after trabeculectomy. J Glaucoma 14(6):435–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wells AP, Bunce C, Khaw PT (2004) Flap and suture manipulation after trabeculectomy with adjustable suture: titration of flow and intraocular pressure in guarded filtration surgery. J Glaucoma 13(5):400–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Simsek T, Cititrik M, Batman A, Mutevelli S et al (2006) Efficacy and complications of releasable suture trabeculectomy and standard trabeculectomy. Int Ophthalmol 15 (Epub ahead of print)

  20. Yalvac IS, Sahin M, Eksioglu U et al (2004) Primary viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma. Three-year prospective randomised clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:2050–2057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tan JHC, Hitchings RA (2001) Non-penetrating glaucoma surgery: the state of play. Br J Ophthalmol 85:234–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Spaeth Gl, Mutlukan E (2001) The use of antimetabolites with trabeculectomy: a critical appraisal. J Glaucoma 10(3):145–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Broadway D, Grierson I, Hitchings R (1993) Adverse effects of topical antiglaucomatous medications on the conjunctiva. Br J Ophthalmol 77:590–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Balestrazzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caporossi, A., Balestrazzi, A., Malandrini, A. et al. A randomized prospective study comparing trabeculectomy with and without the use of a new removable suture. Int Ophthalmol 29, 359–365 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-008-9245-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-008-9245-z

Keywords

Navigation