Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The results of trabeculectomy using a sutureless scleral tunnel technique

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the surgical outcome in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) control and safety of procedure using a sutureless scleral tunnel technique in patients with uncontrolled glaucoma. Materials and methods This was a prospective, consecutive, noncomparative interventional case series of patients undergoing trabeculectomy. The study was conducted on 19 eyes of 19 patients with medically uncontrolled glaucoma. All of the patients underwent sutureless scleral tunnel trabeculectomy and were followed for 6 months. Patient data such as sex, age, IOP, LogMAR visual acuity (LogMAR VA), antiglaucoma medications, intraoperative and postoperative complications, bleb morphology, and success rate were collected and statistically analyzed. Results Two patients were excluded because of defaulted follow-up. Mean age was 60.58 (±15.14) years, and 65% of the patients were male. Before intervention mean IOP was 29.29 (±8.22) mmHg, and mean number of antiglaucoma medications was 2.05 (±0.89). Six months after intervention, mean IOP was 15.00 (±3.82) mmHg (P < 0.001), mean number of antiglaucoma medications was 0.52 (±1.06) (P < 0.001), complete success rate was 65%, and qualified success rate was 23%. Five patients (29.4%) needed adjunctive needling bleb revision. No major intraoperative complications were encountered. Only four patients (23.5%) had microscopic hyphema and three patients (18%) had flat anterior chamber (grade I) in the immediate postoperative period that managed medically. All but four had shallow and diffuse blebs at last follow-up. Conclusion It appears that sutureless scleral tunnel trabeculectomy is a safe and effective drainage procedure for treating uncontrolled glaucoma. Larger-scale study is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cairns JE (1968) Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol 66:673–679

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Watson PG, Jakeman C, Ozturk M, Barnett MF, Barnett F, Khaw KT (1990) The complications of trabeculectomy (a 20-year follow-up). Eye 4(Pt 3):425–438

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berke SJ, Bellows AR, Shingleton BJ et al (1987) Chronic and recurrent choroidal detachment after glaucoma filtering surgery. Ophthalmology 94:154–162

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rahman A, Mendonca M, Simmons RB et al (2000) Hypotony after glaucoma filtration surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin 40:127–136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Raina UK, Tuli D, Mehta DK (1999) Polyglactin sutures versus nylon sutures for scleral flap suturing in trabeculectomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 30:554–559

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Edmunds B, Thompson JR, Salmon JF et al (2001) The National Survey of Trabeculectomy. II. Variations in operative technique and outcome. Eye 15(Pt 4):441–448

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stalmans I, Gillis A, Lafaut AS, Zeyen T (2006) Safe trabeculectomy technique: long term outcome. Br J Ophthalmol 90:44–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Simsek T, Citirik M, Batman A, Mutevelli S, Zilelioglu O (2005) Efficacy and complications of releasable suture trabeculectomy and standard trabeculectomy. Int Ophthalmol 26:9–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ashraff NN, Wells AP (2005) Transconjunctival suture adjustment for initial intraocular pressure control after trabeculectomy. J Glaucoma 14:435–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Prevezas DC, Melissurgos ID (1997) Adjustable temporal suture in trabeculectomy with scleral flap. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 28:745–750

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zohdy GA, Lukaris A, Rogers ZA, Hill A, Roberts-Harry TJ (1998–1999) Early results of punch trabeculectomy. Int Ophthalmol 22:253–256

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ophir A, Pikkel J (2001) Mini-trabeculectomy in eyes with high risk of scarring: midterm follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 131:13–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thimmarayan SK, Rao VA, Gupta A (2006) Mini-trabeculectomy in comparison to conventional trabeculectomy in primary open angle glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 16:674–679

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ophir A (2001) Mini-trabeculectomy as initial surgery for medically uncontrolled glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 132:229–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gous PN, Roux P (1995) Preliminary report of sutureless phacotrabeculectomy through a modified self-sealing scleral tunnel incision. J Cataract Refract Surg 21:160–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vuori ML, Viitanen T (2001) “Scleral tunnel incision”—trabeculectomy with one releasable suture. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 79:301–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lai JS, Lam DS (1999) Trabeculectomy using a sutureless scleral tunnel technique: a preliminary study. J Glaucoma 8:188–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wells AP, Bunce C, Khaw PT (2004) Flap and suture manipulation after trabeculectomy with adjustable sutures: titration of flow and intraocular pressure in guarded filtration surgery. J Glaucoma 13:400–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghasem Fakhraie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eslami, Y., Fakhraie, G., Amini, H. et al. The results of trabeculectomy using a sutureless scleral tunnel technique. Int Ophthalmol 29, 329–332 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-008-9240-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-008-9240-4

Keywords

Navigation