Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Irvine Prism Test: Does the Positive Response Indicate Suppression Scotoma?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate whether the positive prism test response is due to the presence of a suppression scotoma or the absence of bifoveolar fixation.

Methods

Fifty-one subjects with esotropia (microtropia, small-, moderate- or large-angle esotropia), and 22 subjects with nonstrabismic anisometropic amblyopia were examined. The prism test was performed by using base-out prisms of two different powers (4-PD and 30-PD), and base-in prism of 20-PD, as well as base-down prism of 10-PD for each subject.

Results

All the subjects with esotropia showed a positive prism test response, whereas all the subjects with nonstrabismic anisometropic amblyopia had a negative prism test response. All the esotropic subjects showed positive response to all magnitudes and positions of the prisms tested.

Conclusions

The positive response to the prism test does not indicate suppression scotoma in subjects with microtropia and small-angle esotropia because all the esotropic subjects showed the positive response regardless of the amount of deviation or the sensorial adaptation mechanisms. Also, the positive response, seen in the esotropic subjects, did not alter to negative by using the prisms of different powers and directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Irvine SR (1944) A simple test for binocular fixation: clinical application useful in the appraisal of ocular dominance, amblyopia ex anopsia, minimal strabismus, and malingering. Am J Ophthalmol 27:740–746

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jampolsky A (1964) The prism test for strabismus screening. J Pediatr Ophthalmol 1:30–34

    Google Scholar 

  3. Helveston EM, von Noorden GK (1967) Microtropia: a newly defined entity. Arch Ophthalmol 78:272–281

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Epstein DL, Tredici TJ (1973) Microtropia (monofixational syndrome) in flying personnel. Am J Ophthalmol 76:832–841

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Frantz KA, Cotter SA, Wick B (1992) Re-evaluation of the four prism diopter base-out test. Optom Vis Sci 69:777–786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Setayesh AR, Khodadoust AA, Said MD (1978) Microtropia. Arch Ophthalmol 96:1842–1847

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Houston CA, Cleary M, Dutton GN, McFadzen RM (1998) Clinical characteristics of microtropia: is microtropia a fixed phenomenon? Br J Ophthalmol 82:219–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Romano PE, von Noorden GK (1969) Atypical responses to the four-diopter prism test. Am J Ophthalmol 67:935–941

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bagolini B (1976) Part I. Sensorial anomalies in strabismus (suppression, anomalous correspondence, amblyopia). Doc Ophthalmol 41:1–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Campos EC (1980) Anomalous retinal correspondence: monocular and binocular visual evoked responses. Arch Ophthalmol 98:299–302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Campos EC (1982) Binocularity in comitant strabismus: binocular visual fields studies. Doc Ophthalmol 53:249–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bagolini B, Campos EC (1983) Practical usefulness of anomalous binocular vision for the strabismic patient. Int Ophthalmol 6:19–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Campos EC, Bolzani R, Cipolli C (1988) Role of the central field in disparity-induced vergence movements in strabismus. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 226:119–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehdorn E (1989) Suppression scotomas in primary microstrabismus – a perimetric artefact. Doc Ophthalmol 71:1–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dengler B, Kommerell G (1993) Stereoscopic cooperation between the fovea of one eye and the periphery of the other eye at large disparities: implications for anomalous retinal correspondence in strabismus. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 231:199–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bagolini B, Campos EC, Chiesi C (1985) The Irvine 4 diopter prism test for the diagnosis of suppression: a reappraisal. Binoc Vision 1:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  17. von Noorden GK, Maumenee AE (1973) Atlas of strabismus, 2nd edn. CV Mosby, St Louis, pp 68–89

    Google Scholar 

  18. Romano PE, Romano JA (1973) Fusion: a new classification and methods for determining the level of sensory binocular co-operation. Surv Ophthalmol 17:458–468

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bagolini B (1985) Objective evaluation of sensorial and sensorimotorial status in esotropia: their importance in surgical prognosis. Br J Ophthalmol 69:725–728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zipf RF (1976) Binocular fixation pattern. Arch Ophthalmol 94:401–405

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tomaç S, Şener EC, Sanaç AŞ (2002) Clinical and sensorial characteristics of microtropia. Jpn J Ophthalmol 46:52–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tomaç S, Birdal E (2001) Effects of anisometropia on binocularity. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 38:27–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lang J (1988) Anomalous retinal correspondence update. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 226:137–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, Hatay, Turkey

    Sühan Tomaç

  2. Sühan Tomaç, 4. Cadde 12/6 Yıldız, Çankaya, 06550, Ankara, Turkey

    Sühan Tomaç

Authors
  1. Sühan Tomaç
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sühan Tomaç.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tomaç, S. The Irvine Prism Test: Does the Positive Response Indicate Suppression Scotoma?. Int Ophthalmol 26, 67–72 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-006-0004-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-006-0004-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation