The Journal of Value Inquiry

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 619–627 | Cite as

Objections to Euvoluntary Exchange Do Not Have “Standing”: Extending Markets Without Limits



  1. Brennan, Jason, and Peter Jaworski. 2016. Markets Without Limits: Moral Virtues and Commercial Interests. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Feinberg, Joel (1984) Harm to Others, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Gaus, G. F. (2005). “The Place of Autonomy Within Liberalism.” Edited by John Christman and Joel Anderson, in Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. New York: Cambridge University Press. 271-306.Google Scholar
  4. Gaus, Gerald. (2011). The Order of Public Reason: A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Guzman, Ricardo, and Michael Munger. “Euvoluntariness and just market exchange: moral dilemmas from Locke’s Venditio.” Public Choice. 158: 39–49.Google Scholar
  6. Ife, J.S. 2006. “The Limits of Law.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Referenced 9-11-2016. Scholar
  7. Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Practical Philosophy, anthology translated by Mary Gregor. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Munger, Michael. (2011). “Euvoluntary or Not, Exchange is Just.” Social Philosophy and Policy. 28(2): 192-211.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations