In the field of global environmental governance, a plethora of international regimes have emerged over the past decades. In some issue areas, multiple regimes aim to govern the issue, sometimes reinforcing, oftentimes conflicting with each other. Consequently, international regime complexes are an empirical phenomenon, which are inherently characterized by specific degrees of fragmentation. For any given issue area, one of the key questions is whether the institutional fragmentation encountered in such regime complexes is synergistic or conflictive in nature. Scrutinizing this question poses methodological challenges of how to delineate a regime complex and how to assess its fragmentation. Drawing on the highly fragmented case of the international forest regime complex, this paper aims to map its institutional fragmentation and to analyse the degrees to which it is conflictive or synergistic. For this we conceptualize the notion of institutional elements and develop a novel method for mapping regime complexes based on their core institutional elements. We then employ tools from the sub-discipline of policy analysis on the complex’s institutional elements for analysing in detail, which of the elements are mutually synergistic and conflictive with other elements of the regime complex. Our results indicate that synergistic relations mostly exist among rather vague elements, often built around sustainability as a core principle. On the contrary, conflictive relations prevail as soon as the elements are designed in more concrete and substantial ways. We conclude that the forest regime complex displays only degree of seemingly synergistic fragmentation through a number of non-decisions and the use of “sustainability” as an empty formula. De facto, conflictive fragmentation prevails among elements of concrete subject matter. This raises questions on whether vast parts of regime complexes merely serve symbolic functions, while conflicts on substance are being camouflaged.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Convention on Biological Diversity
Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals
Economic and Social Council of the United Nations
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility
Forest Investment Program
Forest Stewardship Council
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
International Agreement on Forests
Intergovernmental Panel on Forests
International Forest Regime Complex
International Labour Organization
Intergovernmental Panel on Forests
International Tropical Timber Agreement
International Tropical Timber Organization
Non-legally Binding Instrument on All Types of Forests
Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification
Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries
Sustainable Forest Management
Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade
The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
Arts, B., & Babili, I. (2012). Global forest governance: Multiple practices of policy performance. In B. Arts, J. Behagel, S. van Bommel, J. Koning, & E. Turnhout (Eds.), Forest and nature governance (pp. 111–132). Netherlands: Springer.
Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2012). Complex global governance and domestic policies: Four pathways of influence. International Affairs, 88, 585–604.
Bezerra, J., Sindt, J., & Giessen, L. (2018). The rational design of regional forest regimes: Comparing Amazonian, Central African and Pan-European Forest Cooperation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 18, 635–656.
Biermann, F., & Pattberg, P. (2012). Global environmental governance reconsidered (p. 320). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., Van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9, 14–40.
Burns, S., & Giessen, L. (2016). Dismantling comprehensive forest bureaucracies: direct access, the World Bank, agricultural interests, and neoliberal administrative reform of forest policy in Argentina. Society & Natural Resources, 29(4), 493–508.
Burns, S. L., Yapura, P. F., & Giessen, L. (2016). State actors and international forest certification policy: Coalitions behind FSC and PEFC in federal Argentina. Land Use Policy, 52, 23–29.
Cadman, T. 2009. Quality, legitimacy and global governance: A comparative analysis of four forest institutions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tasmania.
Cadman, T. (2011). Quality and legitimacy of global governance: Case lessons from forestry. Berlin: Springer.
Cashore, B., & Stone, M. W. (2012). Can legality verification rescue global forest governance? Analyzing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in Southeast Asia. Forest policy and economics, 18, 13–22.
Chan, S., & Pattberg, P. (2008). Private rule-making and the politics of accountability: analyzing global forest governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8, 103–121.
Colfer, C. J. P., & Minarchek, R. D. (2013). Introducing “the gender box”: A framework for analysing gender roles in forest management. International Forestry Review, 15, 411–426.
Dimitrov, R. S. (2005). Hostage to norms: States, institutions and global forest politics. Global Environmental Politics, 5, 1–24.
Dimitrov, R. S., Sprinz, D. F., DiGiusto, G. M., & Kelle, A. (2007). International Nonregimes: A Research Agenda. International Studies Review, 9, 230–258.
Downes, D.R. (1999). Global forest policy and selected international instruments: A preliminary review. In R.G. Tarasofsky (Ed.), Assessing the International Forest Regime. Switzerland: IUCN.
Eikermann, A. (2015). Forests in International Law. Is There Really a Need for an International Forest Convention? Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-36813-9.
Falkner, R. (2016). The Paris agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 92, 1107–1125.
Gale, F., & Cadman, T. (2014). Whose norms prevail? Policy networks, international organizations and “sustainable forest management”. Society and Natural Resources, 27(2), 170–184.
Giessen, L. (2013). Reviewing the main characteristics of the international forest regime complex and partial explanations for its fragmentation. International Forestry Review, 15(1), 60–70.
Giessen, L. (forthcoming): Forests and the two faces of international governance: Customizing international regimes through domestic politics. Edward Elgar, Series on New Horizons in Environmental Politics.
Giessen, L., Sarker, P. K., & Rahman, Md S. (2016). International and domestic sustainable forest management policies: Distributive effects on power among state agencies in Bangladesh. Sustainability, 8, 1–28.
Glück, P., Angelsen, A., Appelstrand, M., Assembe-Mvondo, S., Auld, G., & Hogl, K. (2010). Core components of the international forest regime complex. IUFRO, 28, 37–55.
Holmgren, L. (2010). International forest policy: An overview. Report from the Secretariat for International Forestry Issues, SIFI. Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry.
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Howlett, M., Rayner, J. (2010). Overcoming the challenges to integration: embracing complexityin forest policy design through multi-level governance. In: Rayner, J., Buck, A. & Katila, P., Embracing complexity: Meeting the challenges of international forest governance. A global assessment report. Global Forest Panel on the International Forest Regime, IUFRO World Series Vol. 28. Vienna, 172 pp.
Humphreys, D. (1996). Forest politics—The evolution of international cooperation. London: Earthscan.
Humphreys, D. (1999). The evolving forests regime. Global Environmental Change, 9, 251–254.
Humphreys, D. (2006). Logjam: Deforestation and the crisis of global governance (p. 302). London: Earthscan.
Kastner, T., Erb, K. H., & Nonhebel, S. (2011). International wood trade and forest change: A global analysis. Global Environmental Change, 21, 947–956.
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on politics, 9, 7–23.
Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 36, 185–205.
Krott, M. (2005). Forest policy analysis. Dordrecht: Springer.
Law, G., & Kriwoken, L. (2017). The World Heritage Convention and Tasmania’s tall-eucalypt forests: can an international treaty on environmental protection transcend the vicissitudes of domestic politics? International environmental agreements: Politics, law and economics, 17, 839–854.
Maryudi, A., Nurrochmat, D. R., & Giessen, L. (2018). Research trend: Forest policy and governance–future analyses in multiple social science disciplines. Forest Policy and Economics, 91, 1–4.
McDermott, C. L. (2014). REDDuced: From sustainability to legality to units of carbon—The search for common interests in international forest governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 35, 12–19.
McDermott, C. L., Humphreys, D., Wildburger, C., & Wood, P. (2010). Mapping the core actors and issues defining international forest governance. IUFRO, 28, 19–36.
Negi, S., & Giessen, L. (2018). India in international climate governance: Through soft power from REDD to REDD + policy in favor of relative gains. Forest and Society, 2(1), 47–64.
Oberthür, S., & Stokke, O. S. (Eds.). (2011). Managing institutional complexity: regime interplay and global environmental change. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Paoloni, L., & Onorati, A. (2014). Regulations of large-scale acquisitions of land: The case of the voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of land, fisheries and forests. Law and Development Review, 7, 369–400.
Pattberg, P. (2012). Transnational environmental regimes. In F. Biermann & P. Pattberg (Eds.), Global environmental governance reconsidered. Cambridge: MIT Press. ISBN 9780262017664.
Rayner, J., Humphreys, D., Welch, F.P., Prabhu, R., Verkooijen, P. (2010). Introduction. In: Rayner, J., Buck, A. & Katila, P. (Eds.). Embracing Complexity: Meeting the challenges of international forest governance. IUFRO World Series, Vol. 28, Vienna, 9–18.
Robinson, G. M., & Carson, D. A. (2015). Handbook on the globalisation of agriculture. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rosendal, G. K. (2001). Overlapping international regimes: the case of the Intergovernmental Forum on Forests (IFF) between climate change and biodiversity. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 1, 447–468.
Sikor, T., Auld, G., Bebbington, A. J., Benjaminsen, T. A., Gentry, B. S., Hunsberger, C., et al. (2013). Global land governance: from territory to flow? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 522–527.
Singer, B., & Giessen, L. (2017). Towards a donut regime? Domestic actors, climatization, and the hollowing-out of the international forests regime in the Anthropocene. Forest Policy and Economics, 79, 69–79.
Stokke, O. S. (2013). Regime interplay in Arctic shipping governance: Explaining regional niche selection. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 13, 65–85.
Thomann, E. (2015). Customizing Europe: Transposition as bottom-up implementation. Journal of European public policy, 22, 1368–1387.
Zelli, F., & Van Asselt, H. (2013). The institutional fragmentation of Global Environmental Governance: Causes, consequences, and responses. Global Environmental Politics, 13, 1–13.
We thank EFI colleagues Albert Garduño and Alba Pueyo for their help with the graphics, Yitagesu Tekle for his support as well as Adeline Dontenville for her comments. We would also like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments. We further acknowledge financial support provided by the German Research Foundation (DFG).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Rodríguez Fernández-Blanco, C., Burns, S.L. & Giessen, L. Mapping the fragmentation of the international forest regime complex: institutional elements, conflicts and synergies. Int Environ Agreements 19, 187–205 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-019-09434-x
- Global forest governance
- International forest policy
- Forest policy analysis
- Conflictive/synergistic fragmentation
- Core institution method (UNFF)