Do hydrologic rigor and technological advance tell us more or less about transboundary water management?
- 422 Downloads
Strict hydrologic definitions of basins coupled with technological advances including the use of remote sensing and geographic information systems have given us more accurate and detailed knowledge than ever before about the scale and extent of transboundary waters. This information has had both research and policy impact. The knowledge of the vast number and extent of basins has been used to bring attention to the overall issue of transboundary water management and understand how and why countries conflict and cooperate over water. Combining this information with ideas embedded in legal instruments such as the UN Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses has given us new ways to look at the adequacy, and inadequacy, of existing transboundary institutions and to suggest policy change and institution building. But do precise data and clearly codified definitions always improve our understanding and decision making? Might they even lead us to incorrect conclusions and poor priority setting? This paper examined how the combination of universalized basin scale principles for international water management and increased mapping precision has resulted in policy prescriptions that sometimes run counter to what negotiators and managers have consistently and thoughtfully done in practice. The conclusion is not a call to cease using new technology nor to end the search for principles to guide our resource management actions. Rather it is a call for caution and balance as we apply technology and logic to specific locations in a complex world.
KeywordsGIS Integrated water resources management Scale politics Transboundary waters
- African Development Bank. (2000). Policy for integrated water resources. http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/PolicyDocuments/IWRM%20Policy-%20Integrated%20Water%20Resources%20Management%20-%20FINAL%20version%20(highlights%20removed)_April%2026%202000.pdf. Downloaded February 15, 2014.
- Allen, T. (1998). Watersheds and problemsheds: Explaining the absence of armed conflict over water in the Middle East. Middle East, 2(1), 50.Google Scholar
- Asian Development Bank. (2003). Water for all: The water policy of the Asian Development Bank. Published by the Asian Development Bank. http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/pub/2003/water-policy.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2014.
- Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: How social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2014). Global administrative unit layers. http://www.fao.org/geonetwork/srv/en/metadata.show?id=12691.
- Foucault, M. (1994). So is it important to thin? In D. Faubion (Ed.), Michael foucault, power: Essential of foucault 1954–1984 J (pp. 454–458). London: Penguin books.Google Scholar
- Giordano, M., Drieschova, A., Duncan, J. A., Sayama, Y., De Stefano, L., & Wolf, A. T. (2014). A review of the evolution and state of transboundary freshwater treaties. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 14(3), 245–264.Google Scholar
- International Groundwater Resources Assessment Centre (IGRAC). (2012). Transboundary aquifers of the world. http://www.un-igrac.org/publications/456/.
- International Network of Basin Organizations and Global Water Partnership. (2012). In The handbook for integrated water resources management in transboundary basins of rivers, lakes and aquifers. ISBN: 978-91-85321-85-8. http://www.gwp.org/Global/About%20GWP/Publications/INBO-GWP%20Transboundary%20Handbook/MGIREB-UK-2012_Web.pdf.
- Jarvis, T. (2006). In Transboundary groundwater: Geopolitical consequences, commons sense, and the law of the hidden sea. Ph.D. Dissertation, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
- Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Matsumoto, K. (2002). In Transboundary groundwater and international law: Past practices and current implications. Doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
- Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2011). National water footprint accounts: The green, blue and grey water footprint of production and consumption, value of water research report series no. 50, UNESCO-IHE.Google Scholar
- Miller, F., & Hirsch, P. (2003). In Civil society and internationalized river basin management. Working paper 7. Australian Mekong Resource Centre. University of Sydney.Google Scholar
- Norman, E., Bakker, K., & Cook, C. (2012). Introduction to the themed section: Water governance and the politics of scale. Water Alternatives, 5(1), 52–61.Google Scholar
- Schmeier, S., Gerlak, A. K., & Blumstein, S. (2015). Clearing the muddy waters of shared watercourses governance: Conceptualizing international river Basin organizations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 1–23. doi: 10.1007/s10784-015-9287-4.
- Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global nor local: Glocalization and the politics of scale. In K. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization (pp. 137–166). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- UNEP and OSU (2002). In Atlas of international freshwater agreements. United Nations Environment Program and Oregon State University.Google Scholar
- United Nations (1958). In Integrated river Basin development: A report by a panel of experts. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. p. 60.Google Scholar
- United Nations (1970). Integrated river basin development: Report of a panel of experts (Revised edn.). New York: UN, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
- United Nations (1978). Prepared by the centre for natural resources, energy and transport of the department of economic and social affairs of the United Nations. In Register of International Rivers (Vol. 2, pp. 1–58). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
- United Nations Water (2008). Thematic paper 8, Transboundary waters: Sharing benefits, sharing responsibilities. Water task force on transboundary waters, UNW: Zaragoza, Spain. http://www.unwater.org/downloads/UNW_TRANSBOUNDARY.pdf.
- Westcoat, J. (1984). Integrated water development, water use and conservation practice in Western Colorado. Research paper 210. The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
- Wester, P., & Warner, J. (2002). River basin management reconsidered. In A. Turton & R. Henwood (Eds.), Hydropolitics in the developing world: A Southern Africa perspective (pp. 61–71). South Africa: African Water Issues research Unit, University of Pretoria.Google Scholar
- Wolf, A. T., Yoffe, S. B., & Giordano, M. (2003). International waters: Identifying basins at risk. Water Policy, 5(1), 29–60.Google Scholar