Araya, M. (2011). The squeezed middle: Why Latin America matters in climate politics intercambio climatico: Latin American perspectives on climate change. http://www.intercambioclimatico.com/en/2011/04/13/.
Blavoukos, S., Bourantonis, D., & Tsakonas, P. (2006). Parameters of the chairmanship’s effectiveness: The case of the UN Security council. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy,
Bodansky, D. (2010). The Copenhagen climate change conference: A postmortem. American Journal of International Law,
Chasek, P. (2011). Creating space for consensus: High-level globe-trotting into the Bali climate change conference. International Negotiation,
Chevallier, R. (2011). COP17: What role for South Africa as an agent of change?. SAIIA Policy Briefing 38.
Christoff, P. (2010). Cold climate in Copenhagen: China and the United States at COP15. Environmental Politics,
Danish Ministry of Climate and Energy. (2009). Press release ‘Connie Hedegaard hosts Greenland dialogue ahead of UNclimate talks in Barcelona’. http://www.kebmin.dk/node/859. Accessed July 17, 2015.
Dimitrov, R. S. (2010). Inside Copenhagen: The state of climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 10(2), 18–24.
Depledge, J. (2005). The organization of global negotiations: Constructing the climate change regime. London: Earthscan.
Grubb, M. (2011). Editorial: Cancun: The art of the possible. Climate Policy,
Grubb, M., & Gupta, J. (2000). Leadership: Theory and methodology. In M. Grubb & J. Gupta (Eds.), Climate change and european leadership: A sustainable role of Europe. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gupta, J., & Ringius, L. (2001). The EU’s climate leadership: Reconciling ambition and reality. International Environmental Agreements: Politics Law and Economics,
Hampson, F. O., & Hart, M. (1995). Multilateral negotiations: Lessons from arms control, trade, and the environment. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Karlsson, C., Hjerpe, M., Parker, C., & Linér, B.-O. (2011). Looking for leaders: Perceptions of climate change leadership among climate change negotiation participants. Global Environmental Politics,
Karlsson, C., Hjerpe, M., Parker, C., & Linér, B.-O. (2012). The legitimacy of leadership in international climate change negotiations. Ambio,
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23.
Khor, M. (2010). Complex implications of the cancun climate conference. Economics & Political Weekly,
Knight, S. (2009). ‘Eleven days in December’. Prospect. Issue 164 (October 2009). http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2009/10/eleven-days-in-december/ Accessed July 17, 2015.
La Vina, A. G. M., Ang, L. & Dulce, J. (2011). The cancun agreements: Do they advance global cooperation on climate change?. Foundation for International Environmental Law and Development (FIELD). http://www.field.org.uk/files/the_cancun_agreements__lavina_ang_dulce_0.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2015.
Mehling, M. (2010). From Brokenhagen to cancun can!: The cancun climate summit and its significance for transatlantic relations. Perspective, FES Washington Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/07729.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2015.
Meilstrup, P. (2010). The runaway summit: The background story of the Danish Presidency of COP15, the UN climate change conference. In Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook 2010. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/rome2007/docs/What%20really%20happen%20in%20COP15.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2015.
Metcalfe, D. (1998). The presidency of the council. International Negotiations,
Morgan, J. et al. (2010). Reflections on the cancun agreements. World Resources Institute. http://pdf.wri.org/reflections_on_cancun_agreements.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2015.
Nasiritousi, N., & Linnér, B.-O. (2014). Open or closed meeting? Explaining nonstate actor involvement in the international climate change negotiations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.,. doi:10.1007/s10784-014-9237-6.
Odell, J. S. (2005). Chairing a WTO negotiations. Journal of International Economic Law,
Parker, C., Karlsson, C., Hjerpe, M., & Linér, B.-O. (2012). Fragmented climate change leadership: Making sense of the ambiguous outcome of COP-15. Environmental Politics,
Pew Center (2009). Summary of COP 15 and CMP 5 prepared by the Pew Center on Global Climate Change. http://www.pewclimate.org/international/copenhagen-climate-summit-summary.
Rajamani, L. (2010). III. The making and unmaking of the Copenhagen accord. International and Comparative Law Quarterly,
Rajamani, L. (2011). The cancun agreements: Reading the text, subtext and tea leaves. International and Comparative Law Quarterly,
Steinmo, S. (2008). What is historical institutionalism? In D. DellaPorta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches in the social sciences (pp. 113–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Streck, C., et al. (2011). The results and relevance of the cancun climate conference. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law,
Sweney, M. (2009). Copenhagen climate change treaty backed by ‘Hopenhagen’ campaign. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2009/jun/23/hopenhagen-climate-change-campaign. Accessed July 17, 2015.
Tallberg, J. (2002). The power of the chair in international bargaining. Article prepared for presentation at the 2002 ISA Annual Convention, New Orleans, March 24–27 2002.
Tallberg, J. (2010). The power of the chair: Formal leadership in international cooperation. International Studies Quarterly,
Underdal, A. (1994). Leadership theory: Rediscovering the arts of management. In I. Z. William (Ed.), International multilateral negotiation: Approaches to the management of complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
UNFCCC (1996). Draft rules of procedure of the conference of the parties and its subsidiary bodies. FCCC/CP/1996/2. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop2/02.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2015.
Yamin, F., & Depledge, J. (2005). The international climate change regime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Young, O. (1991). Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions in international society. International Organization, 45(3), 281–308.