Clearing the muddy waters of shared watercourses governance: conceptualizing international River Basin Organizations

  • Susanne Schmeier
  • Andrea K. Gerlak
  • Sabine Blumstein
Original Paper

Abstract

Institutions that have been set up by riparian states to internationally govern shared water resources—international River Basin Organizations (RBOs)—play a key role in river basin governance. Despite an increased attention paid to RBOs in international relations and water scholarship, there has been little focus on defining and conceptualizing RBOs and, subsequently, on comprehensively identifying the RBOs that exist around the world. This has challenged research around RBOs in both methodological and theoretical ways. This paper aims to meet this challenge by offering a theoretically grounded definition of an international RBO and crafting a comprehensive list of international RBOs. We do so deductively, building from the larger neo-institutionalist research and international water resources governance literature. Our definition identifies three broad categories of constitutive elements: internationalization, institutionalization and governance. We apply this definition to potential cases to better identify the extent of RBOs around the world today and outline which cases qualify as RBOs and which cases fail to meet our constitutive criteria. This allows us to compile a comprehensive list of all existing international RBOs, including the identification of RBOs with specific characteristics. The article concludes by crafting an agenda for future research around RBOs that builds on this more complete understanding of RBOs.

Keywords

International rivers and lakes Water cooperation International River Basin Organizations 

References

  1. Aguilar, G., & Iza, A. (2011). Governance of shared waters: Legal and institutional issues. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  2. Backer, E. (2007). The Mekong river commission: Does it work, and how does the Mekong basin’s geography influence its effectiveness. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 26(4), 31–55.Google Scholar
  3. Bakker, M. (2007). Transboundary river floods: Vulnerability of continents, international river basins and countries. Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  4. Benvenisti, E. (2002). Sharing transboundary resources: International law and optimal resource use. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berardo, R., & Gerlak, A. (2012). Conflict and cooperation along international rivers: Crafting a model of institutional effectiveness. Global Environmental Politics, 12(1), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernauer, T. (1995). The effect of international environmental institutions: How we might learn more. International Organizations, 49(2), 351–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernauer, T. (1997). Managing international rivers. In O. Young (Ed.), Global environmental accords series. Global governance. Drawing insights from the environmental experience (pp. 155–195). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bernauer, T. (2002). Explaining success and failure in international river management. Aquatic Sciences, 64, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biermann, F., & Bauer, F. (2004). Assessing the effectiveness of intergovernmental organizations in international environmental politics. Global Environmental Change, 14, 189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brownlie, I. (2008). Principles of public international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bruch, C., Jansky, L., Nakayama, M., & Salewicz, A. (Eds.). (2005). Water resources management and policy. Public participation in the governance of international freshwater resources. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chenoweth, J., & Feitelson, E. (2001). Analysis of factors influencing data and information exchange in international river basins: Can such exchanges be used to build confidence in cooperative management? Water International, 26(4), 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conca, K. (2006). Governing water: Contentious transnational politics and global institution building. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cosgrove, W., & Rijsberman, F. (2000). World water vision: Making water everybody’s business. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  15. Delli Priscoli, J., & Wolf, A. (2009). Managing and transforming water conflicts. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dinar, S. (2009). Scarcity and cooperation along international rivers. Global Environmental Politics, 9(1), 107–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dombrowsky, I. (2007). Conflict, cooperation and institutions in international water management: An economic analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  18. Duffield, J. (2007). What are international institutions? International Studies Review, 9, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Durth, R. (1996). Grenzüberschreitende Umweltprobleme und regionale Integration: Zur politischen Ökonomie von Oberlauf-Unterlauf-Problemen an internationalen Flüssen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  20. Efinger, M., Rittberger, V., & Zürn, M. (1988). Internationale Regime in den Ost-West-Beziehungen. Frankfurt am Main: Haag & Herchen.Google Scholar
  21. Elhance, A. (2000). Hydropolitics: Grounds for despair, reasons for hope. International Negotiation, 5, 201–222.Google Scholar
  22. Gerlak, A. (2015). When regionalism works: An exploration of design element and contexts. In Paper prepared for the Eighth Biennial Rosenberg International Forum on Water Policy, Sep 30–Oct 2, 2012. Aqaba, Jordan.Google Scholar
  23. Gerlak, A., & Grant, K. (2009). The correlates of cooperative institutions for international rivers. In T. J. Volgy, Z. Šabič, P. Roter, & A. K. Gerlak (Eds.), Mapping the New world order (pp. 114–147). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Gleditsch, N., Furlong, K., Hegre, H., Lacina, B., & Owen, T. (2006). Conflicts over shared rivers: Resource scarcity or fuzzy boundaries. Political Geography, 25, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Global Water Partnership (GWP). (2009). The handbook for integrated water resources management in basins. http://www.unwater.org/downloads/gwp_inbo%20handbook%20for%20iwrm%20in%20basins_eng.pdf. (Accessed October 28, 2013).
  26. Global Water Partnership (GWP). (2012). The handbook for integrated water resources management in transboundary basins of rivers, lakes and aquifers. http://www.gwp.org/Global/About%20GWP/Publications/INBO-GWP%20Transboundary%20Handbook/MGIREB-UK-2012_Web.pdf. (Accessed June 23, 2013).
  27. Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R., & Slaughter, A. (2000). Introduction: Legalization and World politics. International Organization, 54(3), 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Green Cross International. (2000). National sovereignty and international watercourses. Geneva: Green Cross International.Google Scholar
  30. Greene, O. (1996). Environmental regimes. Effectiveness and implementation review. In J. Vogler & M. F. Imber (Eds.), The environment and international relations (pp. 196–214). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Haftendorn, H. (2000). Water and international conflict. Third World Quarterly, 21(1), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P., & Rittberger, V. (1997). Regimes as links between states: Three theoretical perspectives (p. 29). Tübingen: Tübinger Arbeitspapiere zur internationalen Politik und Friedensforschung no.Google Scholar
  33. Hooper, B. (2006). Key performance indicators of river basin organizations. Research paper 2006-VSP-01. US Army Corps of Engineers Visiting Scholar Program.Google Scholar
  34. International Network of Basin Organizations. (INBO). (2013). Charter of organization and operation. http://www.inbo-news.org/inbo/organization/article/charter-of-organization-and. (Accessed June 23, 2013).
  35. Jacobs, Inga. M. (2012). A community in the Orange: The development of a multi-level water governance framework in the Orange–Sengu river basin in South Africa. International Environmental Agreements, 12, 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jägerskog, A. (2003). Why states cooperate on shared water: The water negotiations in the Jordan Basin. Ph.D. thesis. http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/publications/abst_docs/related_research/jagerskog2003.pdf. (Accessed June 23, 2013).
  37. Keohane, R. (1988). International institutions: Two approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kibaroğlu, A. (2008). The Role of epistemic communities in offering new cooperation frameworks in the Euphrates–Tigris rivers systems. Journal of International Affairs, 61(2), 183–198.Google Scholar
  39. Klaphake, A., & Scheumann, W. (2006). Understanding transboundary water cooperation: Evidence form Africa. Working paper. Management in environmental planning no. 014/2006, Institute for Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, Technical University of Berlin.Google Scholar
  40. Kliot, N., Shmueli, D., & Shamir, U. (2001). Development of institutional frameworks for the management of transboundary water resources. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 1(3/4), 306–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Koremenos, B. (2008). When, what and why do states choose to delegate. Law and Contemporary Problems, 71(4), 151–192.Google Scholar
  42. Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international instiuttions. International Organization, 55(4), 761–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Krasner, S. (1983). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. In Krasner, S. (Ed.), International regimes (pp. 1–21). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lautze, J., de Silva, S., Giordano, M., & Sanford, L. (2011). Putting the cart before the horse: Water governance and IWRM. Natural Resources Forum, 35(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lautze, J., Wegerich, K., Kazbekov, J., & Yakubov, M. (2012). International river basin organizations: Variation, options, insights. Water International, 38(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  46. Lindemann, S. (2008). Understanding water regime formation—A research framework with lessons from Europe. Global Environmental Politics, 8(4), 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lowi, M. (1993). Water and power: The politics of a scarce resource in the Jordan River Basin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marty, F. (2001). Managing international rivers: Problems, politics, and institutions. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  49. Mayer, P. (2006). Macht, Gerechtigkeit und Internationale Kooperation. Eine Regimeanalytische Untersuchung zur Internationalen Rohstoffpolitik. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  50. Merrey, D., & Cook, S. (2012). Fostering institutional creativity at multiple levels: Towards facilitated institutional bricolage. Water Alternatives, 5(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  51. Milich, L., & Varady, R. (1999). Openness, sustainability, and public participation: New designs for transboundary river basin institutions. Journal of Environment and Development, 8(3), 258–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mitchell, R., & Bernauer, T. (2004). Beyond story-telling: Designing case study research in international environmental policy. In D. F. Sprinz & Y. Wolinsky-Nahmias (Eds.), Models, numbers and cases. Methods for studying international relations (pp. 81–106). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  53. Molle, F. (2009). River-basin planning and management: The social life of a concept. Geoforum, 40(3), 484–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mostert, E. (2003). Conflict and co-operation in international freshwater management: A global review. International Journal of River Basin Management, 1(3), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pahl-Wostl, C., Lebel, L., Knieper, C., & Nikitina, E. (2012). From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: Towards adaptive water governance in river basins. Environmental Science & Policy, 23, 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pohl, B., Carius, A., Conca, K., Dabelko, G., Kramer, A., Michel, D., et al. (2014). The rise of hydro-diplomacy. Strengthening foreign policy for transboundary waters. Berlin: Adelphi, Federal Foreign Office.Google Scholar
  57. Rangeley, R., Thiam, B., Andersen, R., & Lyle, C. (1994). International River Basin Organizations in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Technical paper no. 25. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  58. Rieckermann, J., Daebel, H., Ronteltap, M., & Bernauer, T. (2006). Assessing the performance of international water management at Lake Titicaca (Vol. 12). Working paper. Zürich: Center for Comparative and International Studies, ETH Zürich and University of Zürich.Google Scholar
  59. Rogers, P., & Hall, A. (2003). Effective water governance. Stockholm: Global Water Partnership.Google Scholar
  60. Saunier, R. E., & Meganck, R. A. (2007). Dictionary and introduction to global environmental governance. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  61. Savenije, H., & van der Zaag, P. (2008). Integrated water resources management: Concepts and issues. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 33, 290–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schmeier, S. (2013). Governing international watercourses. River basin organizations and the sustainable governance of internationally shared rivers and lakes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Siegfried, T., & Bernauer, T. (2007). Estimating the performance of international regulatory regimes: Methodology and empirical application to international water management in the Naryn/Syr Darya basin. Water Resources Research, 43(11), W11406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Solanes, M., & Jouravlev, A. (2006). Water governance for development and sustainability. http://www.eclac.org/publicaciones/xml/0/26200/lcl2556e.pdf. (Accessed June 23, 2013).
  65. Spector, B. (2000). Motivating water diplomacy: Finding the situational incentives to negotiate. International Negotiation, 5(2), 223–236.Google Scholar
  66. Stinnett, D., & Tir, J. (2009). The institutionalization of river treaties. International Negotiation, 14(2), 229–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Teclaff, L. (1996). Evolution of the river basin concept in national and international water law. Natural Resources Journal, 36, 359–391.Google Scholar
  68. Tir, J., & Ackerman, J. (2009). Politics of formalized river cooperation. Journal of Peace Research, 46(5), 623–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database. International freshwater treaties database. http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/database/interfreshtreatdata.html. (Accessed June 23, 2013).
  70. Underdal, A. (2002). One question, two answers. In E. L. Miles, S. Andersen, E. M. Carlin, J. B. Skjaerseth, A. Underdal, & J. Wettestad (Eds.), Global environmental accord. Environmental regime effectiveness. Confronting theory with evidence (pp. 3–45). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  71. United Nations convention on the law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 21 May 1997, General Assembly Resolution 51/229.Google Scholar
  72. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and Central Asia (UNECE). (2009). River basin commissions and other institutions for Transboundary Water Cooperation. New York and Geneva: UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes.Google Scholar
  73. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and Central Asia (UNECE). Convention on the protection and use of transboundary watercourses and international lakes, adopted 17 March 1992 in Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  74. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2003). Water security and peace: A synthesis of studies. Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001333/133318e.pdf. (Accessed June 23, 2013).
  75. United States Office of the Director of National Intelligence (U.S. ODNI). (2012). Global water security. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of States.Google Scholar
  76. Wettestad, J. (1999). Designing effective environmental regimes: The Key Conditions. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  77. Wolf, A. (2007). Shared waters: Conflict and cooperation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 241–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wolf, A., Natharius, J., Danielson, J., Ward, B., & Pender, J. (1999). International river basins of the world. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 15(4), 387–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wolf, A., Yoffe, S., & Giordano, M. (2003). International waters: Identifying basins at risk. Water Policy, 5, 26–60.Google Scholar
  80. World Bank. (2006). Integrated river basin management: From concepts to good practice. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  81. World Water Council (WWC). (2006). In P. Martinez Austria & P. van Hofwegen (Eds.), Synthesis of the 4th world water forum. http://www.worldwatercouncil.org/fileadmin/world_water_council/documents_old/World_Water_Forum/WWF4/synthesis_sept06.pdf. (Accessed June 23, 2013).
  82. World Wildlife Fund (WWF). (2003). Managing rivers wisely: Lessons from WWF’s work for integrated river basin management. Washington, DC: WWF.Google Scholar
  83. Yoffe, S., Wolf, A., & Giordano, M. (2003). Conflict and cooperation over international freshwater resources: Indicators of basins at risk. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 39(5), 1109–1126.Google Scholar
  84. Young, O. R. (1986). International regimes: Towards a new theory of institutions. World Politics, 39(1), 104–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Young, O. R. (1994). International governance. Protecting the environment in a stateless society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Young, O. R. (2013). Sugaring off: Enduring insights from long-term research on environmental governance. International Environmental Agreements, 13, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zawahri, N. (2008). Designing river commissions to implement treaties and manage water disputes: The story of the Joint Water Committee and Permanent Indus Commission. Water International, 33(4), 464–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zürn, M. (2010). Global governance as multi-level governance. In Henrik. Enderlein, Sonja. Wälti, & Michael. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on multi-level governance (pp. 80–99). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanne Schmeier
    • 1
  • Andrea K. Gerlak
    • 2
  • Sabine Blumstein
    • 3
  1. 1.Gesellschaft für internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ)EschbornGermany
  2. 2.International Studies Association, School of Government and Public PolicyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.Centre for Area StudiesUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations