Global labour unions and just transition to a green economy

Abstract

Questions of justice in the transition to a green economy have been raised by various social forces. Very few proposals, however, have been as focused and developed as the “just transition” strategy proposed by global labour unions. Yet, labour unions are remarkably absent from discussions of the transition towards a green economy. This is surprising as labour unions are arguably the largest organizations in the world fighting for basic rights and more just social relations. This paper tries to advance the potential contribution of labour unions in this arena by asking: what is the full scope of “just transition” today and how have labour unions developed and refined it over the years to render the move towards a green economy both environmentally and socially sustainable? The concept of just transition is hotly debated within labour unions and has different interpretations, and hence different strategies. The last section assesses these interpretations by means of a normative framework, which seeks to fuse political economy and political ecology. Empirically, we add to the growing literature on labour environmentalism, as well as transitions more generally. Analytically, our goal is to place the various approaches to a “just transition” within a heuristic framework of environmental justice that is explicit about power relations when demanding justice, two themes central to this special issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Global Union Federations (GUFs, currently 8) are confederations of national unions in particular sectors such as the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) or the International Chemical, Mine, Energy and General Workers’ Union (ICEM)—now part of IndustriALL. The International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) is a global confederation of national umbrella organizations, such as the AFL-CIO in the USA and the TUC in the UK. The Trade Union Advisory Committee to the OECD (TUAC) is also a confederation of national umbrella organizations, albeit of the industrial countries that are OECD members, while the ETUC is the same for the European Union. In our paper, we are dealing largely with global union organizations such as the ITUC and the GUFs (on which see Stevis and Boswell 2008).

  2. 2.

    Furthermore, as Hrynyshyn and Ross (2011) suggest, it is possible that a union claiming to be a social unionist is not acting consistently with that ideology.

  3. 3.

    OCAW, USA and ECWU, Canada. OCAW joined the PACE which then joined the USW. PACE was hostile to environmentalism largely due to bitter conflicts with environmentalists over logging in Northwestern USA (Foster 1993). Two key people here are Les Leopold (who had worked with OCAW) and Brian Kohler of the ECWU, then the ICEM, and now IndustriALL (see Bennett 2007; personal interview March 2011).

  4. 4.

    The differences between “affirmative” and “transformative” visions of society and justice have been central to the discussion of the social welfare state and social democracy (Esping-Andersen 1990). They should not be confused with the distinction between “reformist” and “revolutionary” strategies, which both have a transformative purpose, but with different means (none of the labour unions we investigate have a revolutionary perspective, hence it does not make its way into our typology). Rather these differences correspond to those between mere “social reform” (which would be “affirmative”) and “reformism” (which is “transformative”) (Miliband 2004[1977] p. 161).

  5. 5.

    We use the term ‘ecocentrist’ for convenience fully cognizant that there are important differences between biocentric and ecocentric ethics (Callicott 2004).

  6. 6.

    Here, we want to underscore that these are the views of the labour organizations and not necessarily of the policy entrepreneurs seeking to move them in the direction of environmentalism.

  7. 7.

    The two organizations are now united in a new federation: IndustriALL.

  8. 8.

    Sustainable jobs would allow for long-term social cohesion and solidarity while green jobs may, in fact, undermine them if they are capital-intensive and do not enhance a community’s social resilience.

  9. 9.

    The rebound effect suggests that efficiency in energy production and consumption (or any other activity) without ecological limits and regulations is likely to increase the use of these more efficient products and, thus, the aggregate impacts on nature (Polimeni et al. 2008; Foster 2009, chap. 6).

Abbreviations

AFL-CIO:

American Federation of Labor—Congress of Industrial Organizations

CLC:

Canadian Labour Congress

COP:

Conference of the Parties

CSD:

Commission on Sustainable Development (United Nations)

ECWU:

Energy and Chemical Workers Union (Canada)

ETUC:

European Trade Union Confederation

GUF:

Global Union Federation

ICEM:

International Federation of Chemical, Energy, Mine and General Workers’ Unions (now part of IndustriALL)

ICFTU:

International Confederation of Free Trade Unions

ILO:

International Labour Organization

IMF:

International Metalworkers’s Federation (now part of IndustriALL)

ITF:

International Transport Workers’ Federation

ITUC:

International Trade Union Confederation

OCAW:

Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers’ Union (USA)

OECD:

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development

PACE:

Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical and Energy Workers International Union (USA)

TUC:

Trade Union Congress (UK)

TUAC:

Trade Union Advisory Committee of the OECD

UN:

United Nations

UNEP:

United Nations Environment Programme

UNFCCC:

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

USW:

United Steelworkers (USA)

References

  1. Albo, G. (2009). The crisis of neoliberalism and the impasse of the union movement. Development Dialogue, 51, 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bachrach, P., & Botwinick, A. (1992). Power and empowerment: A radical theory of participatory democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beckerman, W., & Pasek, J. (2001). Justice, posterity and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett, D. (2007). Labour and the environment at the Canadian Labour Congress: The story of convergence. Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, 10, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bernstein, S. (2001). The compromise of liberal environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bookchin, M. (2007[1991]). Social ecology and communalism. In E. Eiglad (Ed.), Social ecology and communalism. Oakland: AK Press.

  7. Burgmann, V. (2000). The social responsibility of labour versus the environmental impact of property capital: The Australian green bans movement. Environmental Politics, 9(2), 78–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burrows, M. (2001). Just transition. Alternatives Journal, 27(1), 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Callicott, J. B. (2004 [1995]). Environmental ethics: I. Overview. In S. G. Post (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 3rd edition (pp.757–769), vol. 2. New York: Macmillan Reference.

  10. Canadian Labour Congress (2000). Just transition for workers during environmental change. http://www.canadianlabour.ca/news-room/publications/just-transition-workers-during-environmental-change. Accessed 20 May 2010.

  11. Castree, N., Coe, N., Ward, K., & Samers, M. (2004). Spaces of work: Global capitalism and geographies of labour. London; Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cosatu (2011). COSATU policy framework on climate change. http://www.cosatu.org.za/show.php?ID=5679. Accessed 9 March 2013.

  13. Coutrot, T., & Gadrey, J. (2012). ‘Green growth’ is called into question. ETUI Policy Brief, 3, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cumbers, A., Nativel, C., & Routledge, P. (2008). Labour agency and union positionalities in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 369–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dauvergne, P., & LeBaron, G. (2013). The social cost of environmental solutions. New Political Economy,. doi:10.1080/13563467.2012.740818.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dreiling, M. (1998). From margin to center: Environmental justice and social unionism as sites of intermovement solidarity. Race, Gender & Class, 6(1), 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ehresman, T., & Okereke, C. (2015). Environmental justice and conceptions of the green economy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. doi:10.1007/s10784-014-9265-2.

  18. Ehresman, T., & Stevis, D. (2011). International environmental justice. In G. Kütting (Ed.), Global environmental politics: Concepts, theories and case studies (pp. 87–104). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Felli, R. (2014). An alternative socio-ecological strategy? International Trade Unions’ engagement with climate change. Review of International Political Economy, 21(2), 372–398.

  21. Foster, J. B. (1993). The limits of environmentalism without class: Lessons from the ancient forest struggle in the Pacific Northwest. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 4(1), 11–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Foster, J. B. (2009). The ecological revolution: Making peace with the planet. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fraser, N. (1995). From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a ‘Post-Socialist’ age. New Left Review, I(212), 68–93.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fraser, N. (2005). Reframing justice in a globalizing world. New Left Review, II(36), 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gorz, A. (1994). Capitalism, socialism, ecology. London; New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gough, J. (2010). Workers’ strategies to secure jobs, their uses of scale, and competing economic moralities: Rethinking the ‘geography of justice’. Political Geography, 29, 130–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hampson, F., & Reppy, J. (Eds.). (1996). Earthly goods: Environmental change and social justice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature, and the geography of difference. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hrynyshyn, D., & Ross, S. (2011). Canadian Autoworkers, The climate crisis, and the contradictions of social unionism. Labor Studies Journal, 36(1), 5–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. ICEM. (2001). Labour and climate change an ICEM position. Brussels: ICEM.

    Google Scholar 

  31. ICEM. (2009). Sustainability: A role for Labour, a role for the ICEM. Geneva: ICEM.

    Google Scholar 

  32. ICEM and IMF. (2010). Anticipating change and building a foundation for the future. http://www.imfmetal.org/files/10112914522566/AnticipatingChangeBuildingFoundation(EN).pdf. Accessed 24 May 2012.

  33. ILO. (2013). Sustainable development, decent work and green jobs. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  34. ILO and UNEP. (2012). Working towards sustainable development: Opportunities for decent work and social inclusion in a green economy. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  35. IMF (2010). Discussion document towards a climate change policy framework for Africa. http://www.imfmetal.org/index.cfm?c=22948&l=2. Accessed 24 May 2012.

  36. ITF, Climate Change Working Group in collaboration with Lara Skinner and Sean Sweeney, Cornell Global Labor Institute (Eds.). (2010). Transport workers and climate change: Towards sustainable, low-carbon mobility. London: International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF).

  37. ITUC (2010a). Resolution on combating climate change through sustainable development and just transition. http://www.ituc-csi.org/resolution-on-combating-climate.html. Accessed 24 May 2012.

  38. ITUC (2010b). Trade Union recommendations for Cancun’s deliberations of the AWG-LCA 16th Conference of the Parties (COP16). http://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/COP16_ITUC_Recommendations.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2012.

  39. ITUC (2014) Building Workers' Power: Congress Statement. http://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/ituc-3co-e-5-congressstatement-en-210x297-01-140819.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2014.

  40. Kazis, R., & Grossman, R. (1991[1982]). Fear at work: Job blackmail, labor, and the environment. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.

  41. Leopold, L. (2007). The man who hated work but loved labor: The life and times of Tony Mazzocchi. White River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Low, N., & Gleeson, B. (1998). Justice, society and nature: An exploration of political ecology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mazzochi, T. (1993). An answer to the jobs-environment conflict? Green Left (September 8). http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/5630. Accessed 2 June 2012.

  44. McKendry, C., & Janos, N. (2015). Greening the industrial city: Equity, environment and economic growth in Seattle and Chicago. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 15. doi:10.1007/s10784-014-9267-0.

  45. Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42, 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Miliband, R. (2004). [1977]). Marxism and politics. London: The Merlin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Moody, K. (1988). An Injury to All: the decline of American unionism. London; New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Moody, K. (2001). Workers in a lean world: Unions in the international economy. London; New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Munck, R. (Ed.). (2002). Globalisation andLabour: The new “Great Transformation”. London; New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Neale, J. (2010). One million climate jobs. Solving the economic and environmental crises. A report by the Campaign against Climate Change trade union group. http://www.climate-change-jobs.org/sites/default/files/1MillionClimateJobs_2010.PDF. Accessed 9 March 2013.

  51. Newell, P. (2005). Race, class and the global politics of environmental inequality. Global Environmental Politics, 5(3), 70–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013). The political economy of the ‘just transition’. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. OECD. (2011). Towards green growth: A summary for policy makers. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Okereke, C., & Dooley, K. (2010). Principles of justice in proposals and policy approaches to avoid deforestation: Towards a post-Kyoto climate agreement. Global Environmental Change, 20(1), 82–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Olsen, L., & Kemter, D. (2013). The International Labour Organization and the environment: the way to a socially just transition for workers. In N. Räthzel & D. Uzzell (Eds.), Trade unions in the green economy: Working for the environment (pp. 41–57). London: Routledge/Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Parks, B., & Roberts, T. (2010). Climate change: Social theory and justice. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 134–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Polimeni, J., Mayumi, K., Giampietro, M., & Alcott, B. (2008). The Jevons Paradox and the Myth of Resource Efficiency Improvements. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Räthzel, N., & Uzzell, D. (2011). Trade unions and climate change: The jobs versus environment dilemma. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1215–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Räthzel, N., & Uzzell, D. (Eds.). (2013). Trade unions in the green economy. Working for theeEnvironment. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rosemberg, A. (2010). Building a Just Transition: The linkages between climate change and employment. International Journal of Labour Research, 2(2), 125–162.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ross, S. (2007). Varieties of social unionism: Towards a framework for comparison. Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, 11, 16–34.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sassoon, D. (1996). One hundred years of socialism. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Schlosberg, D. (2013). Theorising environmental justice: The expanding universe of a discourse. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Schrecker, T. (1994). Environmentalism and the politics of invisibility. Alternatives Journal, 20(2), 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (2002). Environmental justice: Creating equality, reclaiming democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Silverman, V. (2004). Sustainable alliances: The origins of international labor environmentalism. International Labor and Working-Class History, 66, 118–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Silverman, V. (2006). ‘Green Unions in a Grey World’: Labor environmentalism and international institutions. Organization & Environment, 19(2), 191–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Snell, D., & Fairbrother, P. (2013). Just transition and labour environmentalism in Australia. In N. Räthzel & D. Uzzell (Eds.), Trade Unions in the Green Economy: Working for the Environment (pp. 146–161). London: Routledge/Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Stevis, D. (2013). Good Jobs? Green Jobs? Just Jobs? US labour unions confront climate change. In N. Räthzel & D. Uzzell (Eds.), TradeUunions in the Green Economy: Working for the Environment (pp. 196–213). London: Routledge/Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Stevis, D., & Boswell, T. (2008). Globalization and labor: Democratizing global governance. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Strange, G. (1996). Which path to paradise? Andre Gorz, Political Ecology and the Green Movement. Capital & Class, 20(2), 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Sweeney, S. (2012). Resist, reclaim, restructure: Unions and the struggle for energy democracy. Discussion document prepared for Global Union Roundtable, Energy Emergency: Developing Trade Union Strategies for a Global Transition (October 10–12, 2012). Ms in authors’ files.

  74. Swilling, M., & Annecke, E. (2012). Just transitions: Explorations of sustainability in an unfair world. Cape Town: UCT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Trist, E. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems: A conceptual framework and an action research program. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Labour/Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  76. TUAC and ITUC (2009). A just transition: A fair pathway to protect the climate. Retrieved from http://www.ituc-csi.org/what-s-just-transition.html. Accessed 2 June 2012.

  77. TUC (2008). A green and fair future. For a just transition to a low carbon economy. Touchstone Pamphlet n°3. Trades Unions Congress: London.

  78. Uehlein, J. (2010). Earth day, labor, and me. http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/ 04/19-7. Accessed 20 June 2010.

  79. UN (2012a). Outcome of the Conference: The Future We Want. Rio + 20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. http://www.uncsd2012.org/content/documents/727The%20Future%20We%20Want%2019%20June%201230pm.pdf. Accessed 8 March 2013.

  80. UN (2012b). United Nations Secretary-General’s high-level panel on Global sustainability Resilient People, Resilient Planet: A future worth choosing. http://www.un.org/gsp/sites/default/files/attachments/GSP_Report_web_final.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2013.

  81. UNEP (2006). Report of the Trade Union Assembly on Labour and the Environment on the work of its first meeting. UNEP/DPDL/TUALE/1. http://www.unep.org/labour_environment/PDFs/TUAreport.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2011.

  82. UNEP. (2008). Green jobs: Towards decent work in a sustainable, low-carbon world. Nairobi: UNEP/ILO/IOE/ITUC.

    Google Scholar 

  83. UNEP (2011). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication: A synthesis for policy makers. http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy/Portals/88/documents/ger/GER_synthesis_en.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2012.

  84. UNFCCC (2010) Decision 1/CP.16. The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2012.

  85. Waterman, P. (1993). Social-movement unionism: A new union model for a New World Order? Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 16(3), 245–278.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Williams, R. (1989). Resources of hope. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Young, J. (1998). Just transition: A new approach to jobs v. environment. WorkingUSA, 2(2), 42–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the referees as well as the guest editors of the special issue for their helpful comments. Part of the research for this article by Romain Felli was done with the help of a research grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (PBLAP1-134448), which is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dimitris Stevis or Romain Felli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stevis, D., Felli, R. Global labour unions and just transition to a green economy. Int Environ Agreements 15, 29–43 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-014-9266-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Labour unions
  • Labour environmentalism
  • Environmental justice
  • Global environmental politics