Explaining differences in sub-national patterns of clean technology transfer to China and India
The Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) has the capacity to incentivize the international transfer of environmentally sound technologies. Given that both countries are expected to have similar incentives when managing the distribution of technology transfer within the country, why do sub-national patterns in the allocation of projects with technology transfer differ? Using comparable political–economic data compiled for China and India, we offer an explanation for these differences. In China, where the government regards the CDM as a tool for achieving sustainable development, technology transfer is concentrated in provinces that need it the most and that are most conducive to receiving transfers (i.e., economically less developed, yet heavily industrialized provinces). In India, where the government takes on a “laissez-faire” approach to the CDM, neither level of economic development nor that of industrialization affects clean technology transfer. In this regard, although the incentives are similar, the capacity to pursue them is not comparable. We test these hypotheses using data on CDM technology transfer across Chinese provinces and Indian states during the 6-year period from 2004 to 2010.
KeywordsTechnology transfer CDM China India Sustainable development Subnational variation
- Babu, N., Yuvarah, D., & Michaelowa, A. (2003). Removing barriers for renewable energy CDM projects in India and building capacity at the state level. HWWA Report 237, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.Google Scholar
- Bayer, P., & Urpelainen, J. (2013). External sources of clean technology: Evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism. Review of International Organizations, 8(1), 81–109.Google Scholar
- Bayer, P., Urpelainen, J., & Xu, A. (2014). Laissez faire and the Clean Development Mechanism: Determinants of project implementation in Indian states, 2003–2011. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0746-3.
- Bayer, P., Urpelainen, J., & Wallace, J. (2013). Who uses the Clean Development Mechanism? An empirical analysis of projects in Chinese provinces. Global Environmental Change, 23(2), 512–521.Google Scholar
- Capoor, K., & Ambrosi, P. (2007). State and trends of the carbon market 2007. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.com/handle/10986/13406.
- CDM0472. (2006). Project design document for Project CDM0472. http://cdm.unfccc.int/UserManagement/FileStorage/9M7MLW12TKXFW9GRJRYR3MAH0NE181. Accessed 21 June 2012.
- CDM4412. (2008). Project design document for Project CDM4412. http://cdm.unfccc.int/UserManagement/FileStorage/TIJ1RMX9WC5H2UGDPFZQ0EYVSANK3O. Accessed 21 June 2012.
- Chen, S., & Ravallion, M. (2008). China is poorer than we thought, but no less succeessful in the fight against poverty. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4621.Google Scholar
- de Coninck, H., Haake, F., & van der Linden, N. (2007). Technology transfer in the Clean Development Mechanism. Climate Policy, 7(5), 444–456.Google Scholar
- de Jong, C., & Walet, K. (Eds.). (2004). A guide to emissions trading: Risk management and business implications. London: Risks Books of Incisive Financial Publishing.Google Scholar
- Dechezleprêtre, A., Glachant, M., & Ménière, Y. (2008). The Clean Development Mechanism and the international diffusion of technologies: An empirical study. Energy Policy, 36(4), 1273–1283.Google Scholar
- Doranova, A., Costa, I., & Duysters, G. (2010). Knowledge base determinants of technology sourcing in Clean Development Mechanism projects. Energy Policy, 38(10), 5550–5559.Google Scholar
- Ganapati, S., & Liu, L. (2008). The Clean Development Mechanism in China and India: A comparative institutional analysis. Public Administration and Development, 28, 351–362.Google Scholar
- Ganapati, S., & Liu, L. (2009). Sustainable development in the Clean Development Mechanism: The role of designated National Authority in China and India. Climate Policy, 52(1), 43–60.Google Scholar
- Gao, G. (2008). Speech at China 2008 CDM experience exchange conference in Beijing. Inspector of Department of Climate Change of NDRC.Google Scholar
- Heller, T., & Shukla, P. R. (2003). Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the international effort against climate change. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.Google Scholar
- Lecocq, F., & Ambrosi, P. (2007). The Clean Development Mechanism: History, status, and prospects. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1, 134–151.Google Scholar
- Lieberthal, K., & Oksenberg, M. (1990). Policy making in China: Leaders, structures, and processes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Lu, G. (2004). Incineration of HFC-23 waste streams CDM projects in China. Opportunities in the project development and cooperation.Google Scholar
- Nautiyal, H., & Varun, (2012). Progress in renewable energy under Clean Development Mechanism in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2913–2919.Google Scholar
- Ockwell, D., Watson, J., MacKerron, G., Pal, P., Yamin, F., Vasudevan, N., & Mohanty, P. (2007). UK-India collaboration to identify the barriers to the transfer of low carbon energy technology. Sussex Energy Group, TERI, and Institute of Development Studies at University of Sussex.Google Scholar
- Popp, D. (2011). International technology transfer, climate change, and the Clean Development Mechanism. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5(1), 131–152.Google Scholar
- Schroeder, M. (2009a). Utilizing the Clean Development Mechanism for the deployment of renewable energies in China. Applied Energy, 86(2), 237–242.Google Scholar
- Schroeder, M. (2009b). Varieties of carbon governance: Utilizing the Clean Development Mechanism for Chinese priorities. Journal of Environment and Development, 18(4), 371–394.Google Scholar
- Takahashi, K., & Zhang, M. (2011). Market mechanisms country fact sheet: People’s Republic of China. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Market Mechanism Group.Google Scholar
- UNFCCC. (2010). The contribution of the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.Google Scholar