Explaining differences in sub-national patterns of clean technology transfer to China and India

Original Paper

Abstract

The Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) has the capacity to incentivize the international transfer of environmentally sound technologies. Given that both countries are expected to have similar incentives when managing the distribution of technology transfer within the country, why do sub-national patterns in the allocation of projects with technology transfer differ? Using comparable political–economic data compiled for China and India, we offer an explanation for these differences. In China, where the government regards the CDM as a tool for achieving sustainable development, technology transfer is concentrated in provinces that need it the most and that are most conducive to receiving transfers (i.e., economically less developed, yet heavily industrialized provinces). In India, where the government takes on a “laissez-faire” approach to the CDM, neither level of economic development nor that of industrialization affects clean technology transfer. In this regard, although the incentives are similar, the capacity to pursue them is not comparable. We test these hypotheses using data on CDM technology transfer across Chinese provinces and Indian states during the 6-year period from 2004 to 2010.

Keywords

Technology transfer CDM  China India  Sustainable development  Subnational variation 

Supplementary material

10784_2014_9257_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (87 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 86 KB)

References

  1. Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80(1), 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babu, N., Yuvarah, D., & Michaelowa, A. (2003). Removing barriers for renewable energy CDM projects in India and building capacity at the state level. HWWA Report 237, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.Google Scholar
  3. Bayer, P., & Urpelainen, J. (2013). External sources of clean technology: Evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism. Review of International Organizations, 8(1), 81–109.Google Scholar
  4. Bayer, P., Urpelainen, J., & Xu, A. (2014). Laissez faire and the Clean Development Mechanism: Determinants of project implementation in Indian states, 2003–2011. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0746-3.
  5. Bayer, P., Urpelainen, J., & Wallace, J. (2013). Who uses the Clean Development Mechanism? An empirical analysis of projects in Chinese provinces. Global Environmental Change, 23(2), 512–521.Google Scholar
  6. Benecke, G. (2009). Varieties of carbon governance: Taking stock of the local carbon market in India. Journal of Environment and Development, 18(4), 346–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brewer, T. L. (2008). Climate change technology transfer: A new paradigm and policy agenda. Climate Policy, 8(5), 516–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Capoor, K., & Ambrosi, P. (2007). State and trends of the carbon market 2007. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.com/handle/10986/13406.
  10. CDM0472. (2006). Project design document for Project CDM0472. http://cdm.unfccc.int/UserManagement/FileStorage/9M7MLW12TKXFW9GRJRYR3MAH0NE181. Accessed 21 June 2012.
  11. CDM4412. (2008). Project design document for Project CDM4412. http://cdm.unfccc.int/UserManagement/FileStorage/TIJ1RMX9WC5H2UGDPFZQ0EYVSANK3O. Accessed 21 June 2012.
  12. Chatterjee, E. (2012). Dissipated energy: Indian electric power and the politics of blame. Contemporary South Asia, 20(1), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen, S., & Ravallion, M. (2008). China is poorer than we thought, but no less succeessful in the fight against poverty. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4621.Google Scholar
  14. de Coninck, H., Haake, F., & van der Linden, N. (2007). Technology transfer in the Clean Development Mechanism. Climate Policy, 7(5), 444–456.Google Scholar
  15. de Jong, C., & Walet, K. (Eds.). (2004). A guide to emissions trading: Risk management and business implications. London: Risks Books of Incisive Financial Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Dechezleprêtre, A., Glachant, M., & Ménière, Y. (2008). The Clean Development Mechanism and the international diffusion of technologies: An empirical study. Energy Policy, 36(4), 1273–1283.Google Scholar
  17. Doranova, A., Costa, I., & Duysters, G. (2010). Knowledge base determinants of technology sourcing in Clean Development Mechanism projects. Energy Policy, 38(10), 5550–5559.Google Scholar
  18. Fuhr, H., & Lederer, M. (2009). Varieties of carbon governance in newly industrializing countries. Journal of Environment and Development, 18(4), 327–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ganapati, S., & Liu, L. (2008). The Clean Development Mechanism in China and India: A comparative institutional analysis. Public Administration and Development, 28, 351–362.Google Scholar
  20. Ganapati, S., & Liu, L. (2009). Sustainable development in the Clean Development Mechanism: The role of designated National Authority in China and India. Climate Policy, 52(1), 43–60.Google Scholar
  21. Gao, G. (2008). Speech at China 2008 CDM experience exchange conference in Beijing. Inspector of Department of Climate Change of NDRC.Google Scholar
  22. Greene, W. H. (2010). Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in nonlinear models. Economics Letters, 107(2), 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haites, E., Duan, M. S., & Seres, S. (2006). Technology transfer by CDM projects. Climate Policy, 6(3), 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hascic, I., & Johnstone, N. (2011). CDM and international technology transfer: Empirical evidence on wind power. Climate Policy, 11(6), 1303–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heller, T., & Shukla, P. R. (2003). Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the international effort against climate change. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.Google Scholar
  26. Ivarsson, I., & Alvstam, C. G. (2005). Technology transfer from TNCs to local suppliers in developing countries: A study of AB Volvo’s truck and bus plants in Brazil, China, India, and Mexico. World Development, 33, 1325–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lecocq, F., & Ambrosi, P. (2007). The Clean Development Mechanism: History, status, and prospects. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1, 134–151.Google Scholar
  29. Lewis, J. I. (2007). Technology acquisition and innovation in the developing world: Wind turbine development in China and India. Studies in Comparative International Development, 42(3–4), 208–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lieberthal, K., & Oksenberg, M. (1990). Policy making in China: Leaders, structures, and processes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lu, G. (2004). Incineration of HFC-23 waste streams CDM projects in China. Opportunities in the project development and cooperation.Google Scholar
  32. Nautiyal, H., & Varun, (2012). Progress in renewable energy under Clean Development Mechanism in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2913–2919.Google Scholar
  33. Newell, P. (2009). Varieties of CDM governance: Some reflections. Journal of Environment and Development, 18(4), 425–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ockwell, D. G., Watson, J., MacKerron, G., Pal, P., & Yamin, F. (2008). Key policy considerations for facilitating low carbon technology transfer to developing countries. Energy Policy, 36(11), 4104–4115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ockwell, D., Watson, J., MacKerron, G., Pal, P., Yamin, F., Vasudevan, N., & Mohanty, P. (2007). UK-India collaboration to identify the barriers to the transfer of low carbon energy technology. Sussex Energy Group, TERI, and Institute of Development Studies at University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  36. Popp, D. (2011). International technology transfer, climate change, and the Clean Development Mechanism. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5(1), 131–152.Google Scholar
  37. Schneider, M., Holzer, A., & Hoffman, V. H. (2008). Understanding the CDM’s contribution to technology transfer. Energy Policy, 36(8), 2930–2938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schroeder, M. (2009a). Utilizing the Clean Development Mechanism for the deployment of renewable energies in China. Applied Energy, 86(2), 237–242.Google Scholar
  39. Schroeder, M. (2009b). Varieties of carbon governance: Utilizing the Clean Development Mechanism for Chinese priorities. Journal of Environment and Development, 18(4), 371–394.Google Scholar
  40. Seres, S., Haites, E., & Murphy, K. (2009). Analysis of technology transfer in CDM projects: An update. Energy Policy, 37(11), 4919–4926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shih, V., Adolph, C., & Liu, M. (2012). Getting ahead in the communist party: Explaining the advancement of central committee members in China. American Political Science Review, 106(1), 166–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Streck, C., & Lin, J. (2008). Making markets work: A review of CDM performance and the need for reform. European Journal of International Law, 19(2), 409–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Takahashi, K., & Zhang, M. (2011). Market mechanisms country fact sheet: People’s Republic of China. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Market Mechanism Group.Google Scholar
  44. UNFCCC. (2010). The contribution of the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.Google Scholar
  45. Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57(2), 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang, B. (2010). Can CDM bring technology transfer to China? An empirical study of technology transfer in China’s CDM projects. Energy Policy, 38(5), 2572–2585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wara, M. (2007). Is the global carbon market working? Nature, 445(7128), 595–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science, Program in International and Area StudiesWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceColumbia UniversityNew York CityUSA
  3. 3.Department of GovernmentHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations