Aidt, T. S. (1998). Political internalization of economic externalities and environmental policy. Journal of Public Economics,
Alesina, A., & Weder, B. (2002). Do corrupt governments receive less foreign aid? American Economic Review,
Almer, C. & Winkler, R. (2010). Strategic behaviour in IEAs: When and why countries joined the Kyoto Protocol. Discussion paper 10–14, Bern: University of Bern.
Altamirano-Cabrera, J.-C., Weikard, H.-P., & Haffoudhi, H. (2007). Influence of political pressure groups on the stability of international climate agreements. NCCR climate working paper 2007-03. Bern: University of Bern-EPFL-Paul Scherrer Institute.
Barrett, S. (1994). Self-enforcing international environmental agreements. Oxford Economic Papers,
Barrett, S. (1997). Heterogeneous international environmental agreements. In C. Carraro (Ed.), International environmental negotiations: Strategic policy issues (pp. 9–25). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Barrett, S. (1998). On the theory and diplomacy of environmental treaty-making. Environmental & Resource Economics,
Barrett, S. (2003). Environment and statecraft. New York: Oxford University Press.
Becker, G. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
Black, D. (1948). On the rationale of group decision-making. Journal of Political Economy,
Black, J., Levi, M., & de Meza, D. (1993). Creating a good atmosphere: Minimum participation for tackling the ‘greenhouse effect’. Economica,
Böhringer, C., & Vogt, C. (2004). The dismantling of a breakthrough: The Kyoto Protocol as symbolic policy. European Journal of Political Economy,
Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1975). Polluters’ profits and political response: Direct control versus taxes. The American Economic Review,
Buchholz, W., Haupt, A., & Peters, W. (2005). International environmental agreements and strategic voting. Scandinavian Journal of Economics,
Caparrós, A., Pereau, J.-C., & Tazdaït, T. (2004). North-south climate change negotiations: A sequential game with asymmetric information. Public Choice,
Carraro, C., Marchiori, C., & Oreffice, S. (2009). Endogenous minimum participation in international environmental treaties. Environmental & Resource Economics,
Carraro, C., & Siniscalco, D. (1993). Strategies for the international protection of the environment. Journal of Public Economics,
Carraro, C., & Siniscalco, D. (1998). International environmental agreements: Incentives and political economy. European Economic Review,
Cherry, T. L., & Dickinson, D. L. (2008). Voluntary contributions with multiple public goods. In L. C. Todd, S. Kroll, & J. F. Shogren (Eds.), Environmental economics, experimental methods (pp. 184–193). London: Routledge.
Conconi, P. (2003). Green lobbies and transboundary pollution in large open economies. Journal of International Economics,
Congleton, R. D. (1992). Political Institutions and Pollution Control. The Review of Economics and Statistics,
Congleton, R. D. (2001). Governing the global commons: The political economy of international environmental treaties and institutions. In G. G. Schulze & H. W. Ursprung (Eds.), Globalization and the environment (pp. 241–263). New York: Oxford University Press.
Dannenberg, A., Lange, A. & Sturm, B. (2010a). On the formation of coalitions to provide public goods: Experimental evidence from the lab. NBER working paper 15967. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Dannenberg, A., Sturm, B., & Vogt, C. (2010b). Do equity preferences matter for climate negotiators? An experimental investigation. Environmental & Resource Economics,
De Zeeuw, A. (2008). Dynamic effects on the stability of international environmental agreements. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science,
Dolado, J. J., Griffiths, M., & Padilla, A. J. (1994). Delegation in international monetary policy games. European Economic Review,
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Dreher, A. (2009). IMF conditionality: Theory and evidence. Public Choice,
Egger, P., & Winner, H. (2005). Evidence on corruption as an incentive for foreign direct investment. European Journal of Political Economy,
Egger, P., & Winner, H. (2006). How corruption influences foreign direct investment: A panel data study. Economic Development and Cultural Change,
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics,
Finus, M. (2008). Game theoretic research on the design of international environmental agreements: Insights, critical remarks, and future challenges. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics,
Finus, M., Altamirano-Cabrera, J. C., & van Ierland, E. C. (2005). The effect of membership rules and voting schemes on the success of international climate agreements. Public Choice,
Fredriksson, P. G. (1997). The political economy of pollution taxes in a small open economy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,
Fredriksson, P. G., Neumayer, E., Damania, R., & Gates, S. (2005). Environmentalism, Democracy, and Pollution Control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,
Fredriksson, P. G., Neumayer, E., & Ujhelyi, G. (2007). Kyoto Protocol cooperation: Does government corruption facilitate environmental lobbying? Public Choice,
Fredriksson, P. G., & Wollscheid, W. R. (2007). Democratic institutions versus autocratic regimes: The case of environmental policy. Public Choice,
Frey, B. (1992). Umweltökonomie (3rd ed.). Göttingen: Vandenhoek and Ruprecht.
Freytag, A. (2007). EMU-enlargement: Which concept of convergence to apply? Bank and Credit,
Freytag, A., Koppel, H., Güth, W., & Wangler, L.U. (2010). Is regulation by milestones efficiency enhancing? Jena economic research papers 12-02. Jena: University of Jena.
Freytag, A. & Wangler, L. U. (2008). Strategic trade policy as response to climate change? The political economy of climate policy. Jena economic research papers 2. Jena: University of Jena.
Gleditsch, N. P., & Sverdrup, B. O. (2002). Democracy and the environment. In E. A. Page & M. Redclift (Eds.), Human security and the environment: International comparisons (pp. 45–70). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1994). Protection for sale. American Economic Review,
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1996). Electoral competition and special interest politics. Review of Economic Studies,
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (2001). Special interest politics. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Habib, M., & Zurawicki, L. (2002). Corruption and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies,
Courtois P. & Haeringer, G. (2005). The making of international environmental agreements. Working paper 652.05. Barcelona: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
Haffoudhi, H. (2005a). The logic of two-level games with endogenous lobbying: Case of IEAs. Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Économiques 2005-54. Paris: University of Paris I.
Haffoudhi, H. (2005b). Political-support Lobbies responses to IEAs. Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Économiques 2005-53. Paris: University of Paris I.
Harstad, B. (2006). Flexible Integration? Mandatory and minimum participation rules. Scandinavian Journal of Economics,
Hillman, A. L., & Ursprung, H. W. (1994). Greens, supergreens, and international trade policy: Environmental concerns and protectionism. In C. Carraro (Ed.), Trade, innovation, environment (pp. 75–108). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hoel, M. (1992). International environment conventions: The case of uniform reductions of emissions. Environmental & Resource Economics,
Kempf, H. & Rossignol, S. (2010). National politics and international agreements. Documents de Travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne 2010.52. Paris: University of Paris.
Kirchgässner, G., & Schneider, F. (2003). On the political economy of environmental policy. Public Choice,
Kollmann, A. & Schneider, F. (2010). Why does environmental policy in representative democracies tend to be inadequate? A preliminary public choice analysis. CESifo Working paper 3223, München: CESifo.
Lange, A., Vogt, C., & Ziegler, A. (2007). On the importance of equity in international climate policy: An empirical analysis. Energy Economics,
McEvoy, D. M. (2010). Not it: Opting out of voluntary coalitions that provide a public good. Public Choice,
McEvoy, D. M., Murphy, J., Stranlund, J. K., & Spraggon, J. (2011). The problem of maintaining compliance within stable coalitions: Experimental evidence. Oxford Economic Papers,
McEvoy, D. M., & Stranlund, J. K. (2009). Self-enforcing international environmental agreements with costly monitoring for compliance. Environmental & Resource Economics,
McGinty, M., Millam, G., & Gelves, A. (2012). Coalition stability in public goods provision: Testing an optimal allocation rule. Environmental & Resource Economics,
Michaelowa, A. (1998). Climate policy and interest groups—A public choice analysis. Intereconomics,
Michaelowa, A., & Greiner, S. (1996). Joint implementation from a public choice perspective. World Resources Review,
Miles, E. L., et al. (2002). Environmental regime effectiveness. Confronting theory with evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Milinski, M., Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H.-J., Reed, F. A., & Marotzke, J. (2008). The collective-risk social dilemma and the prevention of simulated dangerous climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Mitchell, R. B. (2009). International politics and the environment. Los Angeles: Sage.
Morrow, J. (1991). Electoral and congressional incentives and arm control. Journal of Conflict Resolution,
Moxnes, E., & Van der Heijden, E. (2003). The effect of leadership in a public bad experiment. Journal of Conflict Resolution,
Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murdoch, J. C., & Sandler, T. (1997). The voluntary provision of a pure public good: The case of reduced CFC emissions and the Montreal Protocol. Journal of Public Economics,
Murdoch, J. C., Sandler, T., & Sargent, K. (1997). A tale of two collectives: Sulphur versus nitrogen oxides emission reduction in Europe. Economica,
Nagashima, M., & Dellink, R. B. (2008). Technology spillovers and stability of international climate coalitions. International environmental agreements: Politics, law and economics,
Nagashima, M., Weikard, H.-P., de Bruin, K. C., & Dellink, R. B. (2011). International climate agreements under induced technological change. Metroeconomica,
Neumayer, E. (2002a). Weak versus strong sustainability: Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Neumayer, E. (2002b). Does trade openness promote multilateral environmental cooperation? The World Economy,
Niskanen, W. (1987). Bureaucracy. In C. K. Rowley (Ed.), Democracy and public choice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Oates, W. E. & Portney, P. R. (2001). The political economy of environmental policy. RFF discussion paper 01-55. Washington, DC: RFF.
Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (2003). The political economy of environmental policy. In K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (Eds.), Handbook of environmental economics (pp. 325–354). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perrin, S., & Bernauer, T. (2010). International regime formation revisited: Explaining ratification behaviour with respect to long-range transboundary air pollution agreements in Europe. European Union Politics,
Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1992). The politics of 1992: Fiscal policy and European integration. Review of Economic Studies,
Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2000). Political economics and economic policy. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization,
Roberts, J. T., Parks, B. C., & Vásquez, A. A. (2004). Who ratifies environmental treaties and why? Institutionalism, structuralism and participation by 192 nations in 22 treaties. Global Environmental Politics,
Roelfsma, H. (2007). Strategic delegation of environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,
Rubio, S. J., & Casino, B. (2005). Self-enforcing international environmental agreements with a stock pollutant. Spanish Economic Review,
Rutz, S. (2001). Minimum participation rules and the effectiveness of multilateral environmental agreements. Working paper 01/22. Zurich: Centre for Economic Research-SFIT.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: London Harper & Brothers.
Segendorff, B. (1998). Delegation and threat in bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior,
Sturm, B., & Weimann, J. (2006). Experiments in environmental economics and some close relatives. Journal of Economic Surveys,
Sturm, B., & Weimann, J. (2008). Unilateral emissions abatement: An experiment. In L. C. Todd, S. Kroll, & J. F. Shogren (Eds.), Environmental economics, experimental methods (pp. 157–183). London: Routledge.
Urpelainen, J. (2012). How do electoral competition and special interests shape the stringency of renewable energy standards? Environmental Economics and Policy Studies,
Vaubel, R. (1986). A public choice approach to international organization. Public Choice,
Vogt, C. (2002). On the political economy of international environmental agreement – some theoretical considerations and empirical findings. In C. Böhringer, M. Finus, & C. Vogt (Eds.), Controlling global warming: Perspectives from economics, game theory and public choice (pp. 178–213). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Von Stein, J. (2008). The international law and politics of climate change. Journal of Conflict Resolution,
Weikard, H.-P. (2011). Towards a global climate constitution. In M. Held, G. Kubon-Gilke, & R. Sturn (Eds.), Jahrbuch Normative und institutionelle Grundfragen der Ökonomik (pp. 89–106). Marburg: Metropolis.
Weikard, H.-P., Dellink, R. B., & van Ierland, E. C. (2010). Renegotiations in the Greenhouse. Environmental & Resource Economics,
Weikard, H.-P., Wangler, L. U. & Freytag, A. (2009). Minimum participation rules with heterogeneous countries. Working paper 2009-077, Jena Economic Research Papers 2009-077. Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
Young, O. R. (1994). International governance: Protecting the environment in a stateless society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.