Geoengineering and global warming: a strategic perspective

Original Paper

Abstract

If major emitters fail to mitigate global warming, they may have to resort to geoengineering techniques that deflect sunlight from planet Earth and remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. In this article, I develop a strategic theory of geoengineering. I emphasize two key features of geoengineering. First, whereas emissions reductions can be mandated now, geoengineering techniques are only available in the future. Second, major powers can unilaterally implement geoengineering projects that may hurt other countries. My game-theoretic analysis demonstrates that unilateral geoengineering presents a difficult governance problem if it produces negative externalities in foreign countries. Interestingly, countries may be tempted to reduce emissions now, so as to prevent a harmful geoengineering race in the future. The theoretical results can help scholars and policymakers understand the relationship between climate mitigation and geoengineering.

Keywords

Global warming Climatepolicy Geoengineering International cooperation Strategy Game theory 

References

  1. Barrett, S. (2003). Environment and statecraft: The strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barrett, S. (2008a). Climate treaties and the imperative of enforcement. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(2), 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, S. (2008b). The incredible economics of geoengineering. Environmental and Resource Economics, 39(1), 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates, R. H., Greif, A., Levi, M., Rosenthal, J.-L., & Weingast, B. R. (Eds.). (1998). Analytic narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blackstock, J. J., & Jane, C. S. L. (2010). The politics of geoengineering. Science, 327(5965), 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bracmort, K., Richard, K. L., & Emily, C. B. (2011). Geoengineering: Governance and technology policy. Congression research service, January 10.Google Scholar
  7. Brovkin, V., Petoukhov, V., Claussen, M., Bauer, E., Archer, D., & Jaeger, C. (2009). Geoengineering climate by stratospheric sulfur injections: Earth system vulnerability to technological failure. Climatic Change, 92(3–4), 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crutzen, P. J. (2006). Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: A contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Climatic Change, 77(3–4), 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eisenberger, P. M., Cohen, R. W., Chichilnisky, G., Eisenberger, N. M., Chance, R. R., & Christopher, W. J. (2009). Global warming and carbon-negative technology: Prospects for a lower-cost route to a lower-risk atmosphere. Energy and Environment, 20(6), 973–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Govindasamy, B., & Caldeira, K. (2000). Geoengineering earth’s radiation balance to mitigate CO2-induced climate change. Geophysical Research Letters, 27(14), 2141–2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Millard-Ball, A. (2012). The Tuvalu syndrome: Can geoengineering solve climate’s collective action problem? Climatic Change, 110(3–4), 1047–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Morton, R. B. (1999). Methods and models: A guide to the empirical analysis of formal models in political science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Naik, V., Wuebbles, D. J., DeLucia, E. H., & Foley, J. A. (2003). Influence of geoengineered climate on the terrestrial biosphere. Environmental Management, 32(3), 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Royal Society. (2009). Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty. RS policy document 10/09.Google Scholar
  16. Schelling, T. C. (1996). The economic diplomacy of geoengineering. Climatic Change, 33(3): 303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schneider, S. H. (2004). Abrupt non-linear climate change, irreversibility and surprise. Global Environmental Change Part A 14(3), 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stanhill, G., & Cohen, S. (2001). Global dimming: A review of the evidence for a widespread and significant reduction in global radiation with discussion of Its probable cause and possible agricultural consequences. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 107(4), 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stern, N. (2006). The economics of climate change: The stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Tilmes, S., Müller, R., & Salawitch, R. (2008). The sensitivity of polar ozone depletion to proposed geoengineering schemes. Science, 320(5880), 1201–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Victor, D. G. (2008). On the regulation of geoengineering. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(2), 322–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Virgoe, J. (2009). International governance of a possible geoengineering intervention to combat climate change. Climatic Change, 95(1–2), 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations