Australian climate policy and the Asia Pacific partnership on clean development and climate (APP). From Howard to Rudd: continuity or change?

Original Paper

Abstract

This article explains, first, why Australia’s government under John Howard, together with the United States Bush administration initiated the Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (APP) and, second, why the succeeding Rudd government continued to support this initiative. Climate policy under the conservative Howard government (1995–2007) in Australia was largely dictated by fossil fuel and mineral sector interests, and reflected a close alliance with the Bush administration. The Howard government shunned the Kyoto Protocol, refused to set national binding greenhouse gas reduction targets and preferred voluntary cooperative measures with industry. The APP was part of the Howard government’s strategy to demonstrate some policy movement on climate change while postponing serious action. Climate change was a key issue in the election of the Rudd Labor government in Australia in December 2007. The Rudd government quickly ratified Kyoto, adopted emission reduction targets, and moved to introduce emissions trading. The Rudd government’s decision to continue involvement with the APP, albeit with diminished funding, was a pragmatic one. The APP was supported by industry and provided bridges to China and India—both key countries in the post-2012 UNFCCC negotiations. Finally, in order to assess the long-term outlook of the APP, the article provides a preliminary assessment as to whether the APP advances technology transfer.

Keywords

Asia Pacific partnership on clean development and climate Australian climate policy Technology transfer 

References

  1. ABC News (2007). Wong chairing meeting to secure Bali deal, December 14, 2007. http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/12/14/2119530.htm. Accessed 18 Aug 2008.
  2. APEC Sydney Declaration (2007). APEC leader’s declaration on climate change, energy security and clean development Sydney September 9, 2007. www.apec.org/apec/leaders_declarations/2007. Accessed 12 Nov 2007.
  3. APP (2007). Asia-Pacific partnership on clean development and climate (APP) partnership for action booklet (2nd ed 2007). http://www.ap6.gov.au/. Accessed 17 Sept 2008.
  4. APP Charter (2006). Charter for the Asia-Pacific partnership on clean development and climate. http://www.asiapacificpartnership.org. Accessed 17 Sept 2008.
  5. APP Communiqué (2006). Asia Pacific partnership on clean development and climate, communiqué. www.asiapacificpartnership.org/pdf/resources/Communique.pdf/June2009. Accessed 1 Jun 2009.
  6. Arvanitakis, J., & Tyler, A. (2008). In defence of multilateralism: How Australian politics can impact Colombia. http://cpd.org.au/article/in-defence-multilateralism. Accessed 20 Aug 2008.
  7. Australia, House of Representatives (2002). Questions without notice: Environment-Kyoto. Hansard, 5 June 2002.Google Scholar
  8. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE) (2006). Technological development and economic growth. ABARE Research Report 06.1. Prepared for the Inaugural Ministerial Meeting of the Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate, Sydney, 11–13 January. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  9. Australian Conservation Foundation (2008). Government must aim higher than Garnaut’s targets, 5 Sept 2008. http://www.acfonline.org.au/articles/news.asp?news_id=1916&c=173040. Accessed 17 Sept 2008.
  10. Australian Government (2006). Asia-Pacific partnership on clean development and climate-partnership for action 2006. www.dfat.gov.au/environment/climate/ap6/appcdc-booklet-06.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2008.
  11. Australian Government (2008). Budget 2008–2009, budget paper no. 2, part 2, expense measures. http://www.budget.gov.au/2008-09/content/bp2/html/expense-28.htm. Accessed 31 Jul 2008.
  12. Australian Government Department of Climate Change (2009a). Carbon pollution reduction scheme, timetable, and draft carbon pollution reduction scheme bill. http://www.climatechange.gov.au/emissionstrading/timetable.html. Accessed 23 Mar 2009.
  13. Australian Government Department of Climate Change (2009b). Australia’s renewable energy target home. www.climatechange.gov.au/renewabletarget/index.html. Accessed 1 Jun 2009.
  14. Australian Greenhouse Office. (2006). Tracking the Kyoto target 2006. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  15. Australian Labor Party (2007). National platform adopted at the 44th ALP national conference, 27–29 April 2007. www.alp.org.au/platform/chapter_09.php. Accessed 24 Jul 2007.
  16. Australianpolitics.com (2002). Howard government decides to ratify International Criminal Court, June 20, 2002. http://australianpolitics.com/news/2002/06/02-06-20.shtml. Accessed 27 Aug 2008.
  17. BBC News (2002).Australia rejects Kyoto pact, June 5 2002. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/2026446.stm. Accessed 5 Aug 2008.
  18. Budget Measures (2008). Australian government budget 2008–09 budget paper no. 2 part 2: Expense measures. http://www.aph.gov.au/budget%20dummy/budget%202007-08%20backup/2008-09/c. Accessed 31 Jul 2008.
  19. Campbell, K. (1998). From Rio to Kyoto: The use of voluntary agreements to implement the climate change convention. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 7(2), 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Christiansen, M., & Porteous, C. (2007). Nationals’ Mark Vale questions climate change. The Courier Mail, October 30, 2007. http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,22669994-5013650,00.html. Accessed 19 Aug 2008.
  21. Christoff, P., & Eckersley, R. (2007). The Kyoto protocol and the Asia Pacific partnership on clean development and climate. In T. Bonyhady & P. Christoff (Eds.), Climate law in Australia. Sydney: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  22. Climate Institute (2007). World’s first climate changed election?, November 23, 2007. http://www.climateinstitute.org.au/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=127&Itemid=1. Accessed 20 Aug 2008.
  23. Commonwealth of Australia. (2007). Australian government, Prime Ministerial task group of emissions trading, report of the task group on emissions trading. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  24. Commonwealth of Australia (2008). White Paper: Carbon pollution reduction scheme. www.climatechange.gov.au. Accessed 23 Mar 2009.
  25. CSIRO (2008). Media release, carbon capture milestone for CSIRO in China reference 8/124, 31 July 2008. www.csiro,au/news/CarbonCaptureMilestone.html. Accessed 13 Aug 2008.
  26. Garnaut, R. (2008a). Garnaut climate change review interim report to the Commonwealth, state and territory governments of Australia, February 2008. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.garnautreview.org.au. Accessed 5 Aug 2008.
  27. Garnaut, R. (2008b). Garnaut climate change review, draft report, June 2008. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.garnautreview.org.au. Accessed 5 Aug 2008.
  28. Garnaut, R. (2008c). Garnaut climate change review, final report, 30 September 2008. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.garnautreview.org.au. Accessed 23 Mar 2009.
  29. Garnaut, R. (2008d). Australia count itself out. The Age, 20 Dec 2008.Google Scholar
  30. Grattan, M. (2008). Garrett opposes Rudd uranium plan, December 12, 2006, theage.com.au. http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/garrett-opposes-rudd-uranium-plan/2006/12/11/1165685616749.html. Accessed 27 Aug 2008.
  31. Hamilton, C. (2007). Scorcher: The dirty politics of climate change. Melbourne: Black Inc. Agenda.Google Scholar
  32. Hamilton, I. (2007). Australia may adopt Kyoto on Bali eve, 3 October 2007, Carbon positive. http://www.carbonpositive.net/viewarticle.aspx?articleID=847. Accessed 27 Aug 2008.
  33. International Climate Change Partnerships (2007). Website of the department of climate change, Australian government. www.climatechange.gov.au/international/partnerships/index.html. Accessed 13 Aug 2008.
  34. Jotzo, F., & Betz, R. (2009). Linking the Australian emissions trading scheme. London: Climate Strategies. http://www.climatestrategies.org/our-research/category/33/128.htm. Accessed 28 May 2009.
  35. Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., & van Asselt, H. (2009). Introduction: Exploring and explaining the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9(3). doi:10.1007/s10784-009-9103-0.
  36. Kirk, A. (2009). Senate emissions stand-off gives Rudd early election trigger, May 27 2009, AM, ABC on line. http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2009/s2581777.html. Accessed 28 May 2009.
  37. Lawrence, P. (2007). The Asia Pacific partnership on clean development and climate (AP6): A distraction to the Kyoto process or a viable alternative? Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, 10(3/4), 183–209.Google Scholar
  38. Lawrence, P. (2008). APEC promises a roar and delivers a whimper: The Sydney declaration on climate and energy. Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, 11(1–2), 29–49.Google Scholar
  39. Lowy Institute for International Policy (2007). Australians speak on foreign policy, media release 30 August 2008. http://www.apo.org.au/linkboard/results.chtml?filename_num= 174838. Accessed 20 Aug 2008.
  40. MacGill, I. (2008). Assessing Australia’s sustainable energy technology options: Key issues, uncertainty, priorities and potential choices. Asia-Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, 11(1–2), 85–100.Google Scholar
  41. Macintosh, A. (2008). Domestic influences on the Howard government’s climate policy: Using the past as a guide to the future. Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, 11(1–2), 51–84.Google Scholar
  42. Macintosh, A. (2009). The Garnaut review’s targets and trajectories: A critique. Environmental Planning and Law Journal, 26, 88–103.Google Scholar
  43. McGee, J., & Taplin, R. (2006). The Asia Pacific partnership on clean development and climate: A complement or competitor to the Kyoto protocol? Global Change Peace and Security, 18(3), 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McGee, J., & Taplin, R. (2008). The Asia Pacific partnership and the United States’ international climate change policy. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 19(2), 179–218.Google Scholar
  45. McGee, J., & Taplin, R. (2009). The role of the Asia Pacific Partnership in discursive contestation of the international climate regime. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9(3). doi:10.1007/s10784-009-9101-2.
  46. Minchin, L., & Tomazin, F. (2007). Howard undermined on climate. The Age, April 25 2007. http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2007/04/24/1177180651382.html. Accessed 26 Jun 2007.
  47. Morgan Poll (2008). Climate change costs erode ALP support, July 25 2008. http://www.roymorgan.com/news/polls/2008/4310/. Accessed 20 Aug 2008.
  48. Pearse, G. (2007). High and dry, John Howard, climate change and the selling of Australia’s future. Camberwell, Victoria: Viking, Penguin.Google Scholar
  49. Pezzey, J. C. V., Jotzo, F., & Quiggin, J. (2007). Fiddling while carbon burns: Why climate policy needs pervasive omission pricing as well as technology promotion. Paper presented at Australia New Zealand Society for Ecological Economics, July 2007. www.apo.org.au/linkboard/results.chtml?filename_num=175184. Accessed 30 Jul 2008.
  50. Philibert, C. (2004). International energy technology collaboration and climate change mitigation. OECD paper COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  51. Quiggin, J. (2007). The greenhouse mafia. The Australian Financial Review, 1 June 2007.Google Scholar
  52. Reid, A. (2008). Global monitor polls and research, Australians willing to curb climate change, July 26, 2008. http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/31355/australians_willing_to_act_to_curb_climate_change1. Accessed 20 Aug 2008.
  53. Rosewarne, S. (2007). Global warming and discourses of uncertainty: Buying time, buying business and engendering risk. In G. Birch (Ed.), Water, wind art and debate: How environmental concerns impact on disciplinary research (pp. 23–69). Sydney: University press.Google Scholar
  54. Rudd, K. (2007). Speech, leadership for long-term sustainability: The roles of government, business and the international community, Address to the National Business Leaders Forum of Sustainable Development, Parliament House, Canberra, May 19, 2007. www.pm.gov.au/media/Speech/2008/speech_o253.cfm. Accessed 30 Jul 2008.
  55. Sandeman, R. J. (2006). A critique of present Australian energy policy. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 63(6), 719–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Seres, S., & Haites, E. (2008). Analysis of technology transfer in CDM projects. Prepared for the UNFCCC Registration and Issuance Unit CDM/SDM. www.cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Reports/TTreport/TTrep08pdf. Accessed 28 May 2009.
  57. Shanahan, D. (2008). Australia funds China clean coal, The Australian, 14 April 2008. http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=5&hid=107&sid=7690bedd-ac52-4f5b-b. Accessed 31 Jul 2008.
  58. Skodvin, T., & Andresen, S. (2009). An agenda for change in U.S. climate policies? Presidential ambitions and congressional powers. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9(3). doi:10.1007/s10784-009-9097-7.
  59. Solar Systems, (2006). Media release, Wednesday 1 November 2006. http://www.solarsystems.com.au/. Accessed 20 Aug 2008.
  60. Stern, N. (2006). The economics of climate change. London: HM Treasury. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/Independent_Reviews/stern_review_economics_climate_change/sternreview_index.cfm. Accessed 12 Mar 2007.
  61. The Australian (2006). China to top US as biggest polluter by 2010, November 2, 2006. Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Database.Google Scholar
  62. The Jakarta Post.com (2007). Never expect Australia to change climate policy, December 10, 2007. http://old.thejakartapost.com/climate/dex.php?menu=sories&detail=129. Accessed 30 Jul 2008.
  63. TRUenergy and Solar Systems (2008). Press release. http://www.solarsystems.com.au/. Accessed 20 Aug 2008.
  64. UNFCCC (2007). National greenhouse gas inventory data for the period 1990–2005 (FCCC/SBI/2007/30) 2007. unfccc.int/resources/docs/2007/sbi/eng/30.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2008.Google Scholar
  65. van Asselt, H., Kanie, N., & Iguchi, M. (2009). Japan’s position in international climate policy: Navigating between Kyoto and the APP. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9(3). doi:10.1007/s10784-009-9098-6.
  66. Wong, P. (2008a). It’s official, Australia is now part of the Kyoto protocol. Media release, 11 March 2008 PW 30/08. http://www.environment.gov.au/minister/wong/2007/index.html. Accessed 30 Jul 2008.
  67. Wong, P. (2008b). Government announces detailed timetable on emissions trading, media release, 17 March 2008 PW 35/08. http://www.environment.gov.au/minister/wong/2008/pubs/mr20080317.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2009.
  68. Wong, P. (2009a). Carbon pollution reduction scheme: Support in managing the impact of the global recession, media release, 4 May 2009a. www.environment.gov.au/minister/wong/2009/pubs/mr20090504a. Accessed 27 May 2009.
  69. Wong, P. (2009b). A new target for reducing Australia’s carbon pollution, media release, May 4 2009. www.environment.gov.au/minister/wong/index. Accessed 27 May 2009.
  70. Woolcott, R. (2005). Lecturing more and listening less. Centre for Policy Development, September 6, 2005. http://cpd.org.au/article/lecturing-more-and-listening-less:-recent-australian-attitudes-towards-multilateralism. Accessed 27 Aug 2008.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Tasmania (UTAS) Law SchoolHobartAustralia
  2. 2.UTAS Climate Change and Antarctic Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre and IUCN Special Interest Group on Climate ChangeUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations