ACB (African Center for Biosafety). (2004). Objection to Public Notice by Monsanto SA (Pty) Ltd, Published in Business Day, Monday 19th January 2004: Application for commodity clearance permit for genetically modified wheat. 9 February.
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bail, C., Falkner, R., & Marquard, H. (Eds.). (2002). The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling trade in biotechnology with environment and development. London: RIIA/Earthscan.
Bennett, C. J. (1991). What is policy convergence and what causes it? British Journal of Political Science,
Bernauer, T. (2003). Genes, trade, and regulation: The seeds of conflict in food biotechnology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bernauer, T., & Aerni, P. (2007). Competition for public trust: Causes and consequences and consequences of extending the transatlantic biotech conflict to developing countries. In R. Falkner (Ed.), The international politics of genetically modified food: Diplomacy, trade and law (pp. 138–154). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Biermann, F. (2002). Institutions for scientific advice: Global environmental assessments and their influence in developing countries. Global Governance,
Biowatch. (2006). Parliamentary committee passes genetically modified organisms amendment bill despite misgivings. Press release, 8 August.
Biowatch. (2008). The Biowatch bulletin: March/April 2008. Capetown, South Africa.
Busch, P.-O., & Jörgens, H. (2005). The international sources of policy convergence: Explaining the spread of environmental policy innovations. Journal of European Public Policy,
Cevallos, D. (2008). Mexico: New Rules pave the way for transgenic crops. Inter Press Service (IPS) News Agency, March 20.
Chauvet, M., & Galvez, A. (2005). Learning about biosafety in Mexico: Between competitiveness and conservation. International Journal of Biotechnology,
China Daily. (2004). GMO import ruling stirs debate. China Daily, 6 April.
Clapp, J. (2006). Unplanned exposure to genetically modified organisms: Divergent responses in the global south. Journal of Environment and Development,
Drezner, D. W. (2001). Globalization and policy convergence. International Studies Review,
Drezner, D. W. (2005). Globalization, harmonization and competition: The different pathways to policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy,
Drezner, D. W. (2007). All politics is global: Explaining international regulatory regimes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
ETC. Group. (2002). Genetic pollution in Mexico’s Center of Maize Diversity. Backgrounder, 8(2). Published by Food First: Institute for Food and Development Policy.
Falkner, R. (2006). International sources of environmental policy change in China: The case of genetically modified food. The Pacific Review,
Falkner, R. (2007). The political economy of ‘normative power’ Europe: EU environmental leadership in international biotechnology regulation. Journal of European Public Policy,
Fitting, E. (2006). Importing corn, exporting labor: The neoliberal corn regime, GMOs and the erosion of Mexican biodiversity. Agriculture and Human Values,
GMO Act. (1997). ([South African] Genetically Modified Organisms Act). No. 15 of 1997. Government Gazette, 383, No. 18029, 23 May.
Gourevitch, P. (2002). Domestic politics and international relations. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. A. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (pp. 309–328). London: Sage.
Gupta, A. (2004). When global is local: Negotiating safe use of biotechnology. In S. Jasanoff & M. Long-Martello (Eds.), Earthly politics: Local and global in environmental governance (pp. 127–148). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gupta, A. (2008a). Global biosafety governance: Emergence and evolution. In O. R. Young, W. B. Chambers, J. Kim, & C. ten Have (Eds.), Institutional interplay: Biosafety and trade (pp. 19–46). Tokyo: United Nations University (UNU) Press.
Gupta, A. (2008b). Transparency under scrutiny: Information disclosure in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics,
Gupta, A., & Falkner, R. (2006). The influence of the Cartagena Protocol on biosafety: Comparing Mexico, China and South Africa. Global Environmental Politics,
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hay, C. (2000). Contemporary capitalism, globalization, regionalization and the persistence of national variation. Review of International Studies,
Heichel, S., Pape, J., & Sommerer, T. (2005). Is there convergence in convergence research? Journal of European Public Policy,
Hepeng, J. (2008). Big funding for GM research. Chemistry World, 26 March. http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2008/March/26030801.asp).
Herrera-Estrella, L. (1999). Transgenic plants for tropical regions: Some considerations about their development and their transfer to the small farmer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (United States),
Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1996). Globalization in question: The international economy and the possibilities of governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hopkins, A. G. (2002). The history of globalization—and the globalization of history. In A. G. Hopkins (Ed.), Globalization in world history (pp. 11–46). London: Pimlico.
Huang, J., & Wang, Q. (2003). Biotechnology policy and regulation in China. IDS Working Paper 195. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
James, C. (2008). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2008. ISAAA Brief 39.
Keohane, R. O., & Milner, H. (Eds.). (1996). Internationalization and domestic politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kerr, C. (1983). The future of industrial societies: Convergence or continuing diversity? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Knill, C. (2005). Introduction: Cross-national policy convergence: Concepts, approaches and explanatory factors. Journal of European Public Policy,
Lakhan, S. E. (2006). The Emergence of modern biotechnology in China. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology,
Levidow, L. (2007). The transatlantic agbiotech conflict as a problem and opportunity for EU regulatory policies. In R. Falkner (Ed.), The international politics of genetically modified food: Diplomacy, trade and law (pp. 118–137). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
Lijie, C. (2002). China. In C. Bail, R. Falkner, & H. Marquard (Eds.), The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling trade in biotechnology with environment and development (pp. 160–165). London: RIIA/Earthscan.
Mahr, C. (2008). China’s genetically altered food boom. Time Magazine, February 18.
Massieu, Y., Gonzalez, R. L., Chauvet, M., Casteneda, Y., & Barajas, R. E. (2000). Transgenic potatoes for small-scale farmers: A case study of Mexico. Biotechnology and Development Monitor,
Mayet, M. (2004). Submissions on South Africa’s genetically modified organisms amendments bill. Published 8 October 2004. Johannesburg: African Center for Biosafety.
Mayet, M. (2006). Is South Africa in the US WTO sights over GM import ban. Johannesburg: African Center for Biosafety.
Millstone, E., & Van Zwanenberg, P. (2003). Food and agricultural biotechnology policy: How much autonomy can developing countries exercise? Development Policy Review,
Morris, J, Rensburg, J. B. J., Hoffmann J. H., & Lazarus, P. (2005). Good regulatory practices for developing countries—lessons learned in South Africa from an appeal under the GMO Act. Paper presented at the 9th ICABR international conference on agricultural biotechnology: Ten years later. Ravello, Italy, July 6–10, 2005.
Murphy, J., & Levidow, L. (2006). Governing the transatlantic conflict over agricultural biotechnology: Contending coalitions, trade liberalisation and standard setting. London: Routledge.
NBS (National Biotechnology Strategy, South Africa). (2001). Department of Science and Technology. http://www.dst.gov.za/programmes/biodiversity/biotechstrategy.pdf.
Newell, P. (2003). Globalization and the governance of biotechnology. Global Environmental Politics,
Newell, P. (2007). Corporate power and ‘bounded autonomy’ in the global politics of biotechnology. In R. Falkner (Ed.), The international politics of genetically modified food: Diplomacy, trade and law (pp. 67–84). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Osava, M. (2006). Biosafety protocol alive, but restricted. Bilaterals.org, IPS. 18 March. http://www.bilaterals.org/article-print.php3?id_article=4174.
Paarlberg, R. L. (2001). The politics of precaution: Genetically modified crops in developing countries. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Pollack, M., & Shaffer, G. (2005). Biotechnology policy. In H. Wallace, W. Wallace, & M. Pollack (Eds.), Policy-making in the European Union (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prakash, A., & Kollman, K. L. (2003). Biopolitics in the EU and the US: A race to the bottom or convergence to the top. International Studies Quarterly,
Quist, D., & Chapela, I. (2001). Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico. Nature,
Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Rosenau, J. (1995). Distant proximities: the dynamics and dialectics of globalization. In B. Hettne (Ed.), International political economy: Understanding global disorder. London: Zed Books.
Rugaber, C. (2002). U.S. officials blast China’s rules on biotechnology after negotiations fail. International Environment Reporter, 13 February, p. 157.
Sasson, A. (2000). Biotechnologies in developing countries: present and future. Volume 3: Regional and sub-regional cooperation and joint ventures. Paris, Barcelona: UNESCO.
Sheingate, A. D. (2006). Promotion versus precaution: The evolution of biotechnology policy in the United States. British Journal of Political Science,
Simmons, B. A. (2001). The international politics of harmonization: The case of capital market regulation. International Organization,
Singer, D. A. (2004). Capital rules: The domestic politics of international regulatory harmonization. International Organization,
Sykes, A. O. (1999). The (limited) role of regulatory harmonization in international goods and services markets. Journal of International Economic Law,
Vogel, D. (1995). Trading up. Consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vogel, D. & Kagan, R. (Eds) (2002). Dynamics of regulatory change: How globalization affects national regulatory policies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Wade, R. (1996). Globalization and its limits: Reports of the death of the national economy are greatly exaggerated. In S. Berger & R. Dore (Eds.), National diversity and global capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Weiss, L. (1999). Globalisation and national governance: Antinomy or interdependence? Review of International Studies,
Wolson, R. (2006). Country Study: South Africa (Report for the NYU Project on International GMO Regulatory Conflicts). New York: NYU School of Law.
Wolson, R. (2007). Assessing the prospects for adoption of biofortified crops in South Africa. AgBioForum,
Wright, S. (1994). Molecular politics: Developing American and British regulatory policy for genetic engineering, 1972–1982. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Young, A. R. (2003). Political transfer and “trading up”? Transatlantic trade in genetically modified food and U.S. politics. World Politics,
Young, O. Y., Chambers, W. B., Kim, J., & ten Have, C. (Eds.). (2008). Institutional interplay: Biosafety and trade. Tokyo: United Nations University (UNU) Press.