Skip to main content
Log in

An overview of the content and historical context of the international freshwater agreements that South Africa has entered into with neighbouring countries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Southern Africa is at a pivotal point in time for transboundary water cooperation. The number and extent of coverage of existing international water agreements and joint management institutions merits cautious optimism about future water management in the region. Yet, taken alone, a numerical account of water treaties reveals little about the context in which the agreements were negotiated, the nature of the rules and regulations adopted, or the influence of the agreements in addressing problems or enhancing joint governance. Drawing on a database containing all the international freshwater agreements entered into between South Africa and its neighbours since 1910, this article examines trends in the articulation of these treaties and discusses the implications of the rules and regulations they embody. Specific consideration is given to issues of information sharing, water allocation and organizations. This analysis is a first step towards understanding the impact of existing agreements, identifying opportunities for the negotiation of new treaties and enhancing existing systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This includes the Chiloango, Congo, Pagani, Umba, Rovuma, Zambezi, Pungwe, Buzi, Save-Runde, Cunene Cuvelai, Okavango-Makgadikgadi, Limpopo, Incomati, Orange-Senqu, Umbeluzi, Maputo, Thukela and Nile rivers as well as the drainage basins of the endorheic lakes Natron and Chilwa.

References

  • African Transboundary Water Law. (2008). Retrieved April 10, 2008, from the African Transboundary Water Law Website http://www.africanwaterlaw.org/.

  • Ashton, P. J., Earle, A., Malzbender, D., Moloi, M. B. H., Patrick, M. J., & Turton, A. R. (2006). A Compilation of All the International Freshwater Agreements Entered into by South Africa With Other States. Report No. 1515/1/06. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, P. J., Hardwick, D., & Breen, C. M. (2008a). Changes in water availability and demand within South Africa’s shared river basins as determinants of regional social and ecological resilience. In M. Burns & A.v. B. Weaver (Eds.), Exploring sustainability science: A Southern African perspective (pp. 279–310). Stellenbosch: SUN Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, P. J., Turton, A. R. (2008b). Water and security in sub-Saharan Africa: Emerging concepts and their implications for effective water resource management in the southern African region. In H.-G. Brauch, U. O. Spring, J. Grin, C. Mesjasz, H. Krummenacher, P. Kameri-Mbote, N. C. Behera, & B. Chourou (Eds.), Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, human, energy, food, health and water security concepts (Vol. IV, pp. 665–678). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basson, M. S., Van Niekerk, P. H., & Van Rooyen, J. N. (1997). Overview of Water Resources Availability and Utilization in South Africa. Report No. P RSA/00/0197. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry and BKS (Pty) Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobbing, J. E., Hobbs, P. J., Meyer, R., & Davies, J. (2008). A critical overview of transboundary aquifers shared by South Africa. Hydrogeology Journal. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/00w5272x7704356q/.

  • Commission of Enquiry. (1970). Report of the Commission of Enquiry into Water Matters in South Africa. Report RP 34/1979. Pretoria: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wit, M., & Stankiewicz, J. (2006). Changes in surface water supply across Africa with predicted climate change. Science Express, 10, 1126–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dlamini, E. M., Dhlamini, S., & Mthimkhulu, S. (2007). Fractional water allocation and reservoir capacity sharing concepts: An adaptation for the Komati basin. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 32, 1275–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dombrowsky, I. (2007). Conflict, cooperation and institutions in international water management: An economic analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • DWAF (Department of Water Affairs and Forestry). (2004). National water resources strategy (1st ed.). Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry. Retrieved March 12, 2008, from http://www.dwaf.gov.za/Documents/Policies/NWRS/Default.htm.

  • Earle, A., & Malzbender, D. (2007). Water and the peaceful, sustainable development of the SADC region. Paper Produced for the Safer-Africa Project, Entitled: Towards a Continental Common Position on the Governance of Natural Resources in Africa. Pretoria: Safer-Africa.

  • FAOLEX. (2004). FAOLEX—Food and Agriculture Legal Database. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved April 10, 2008, from http://faolex.fao.org/faolex/.

  • Heyns, P. S.v. H. (2002). The inter-basin transfer of water between countries within the Southern African Development Community (SADC): A developmental challenge of the future. In A. R. Turton & R. Henwood (Eds.), Hydropolitics in the developing world: A southern african perspective (pp. 157–176). Pretoria: African Water Issues Research Unit and International Water Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILA (International Law Association). (1966). Helsinki rules on the uses of waters of international rivers. The Hague: International Law Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILA (International Law Association). (1986). The Seoul Rules on International Groundwaters. London: Oceana Publishers (Adopted by the International Law Association at the Sixty-second Conference held at Seoul in 1986).

  • Kistin, E. J. (2007, November). Transboundary co-operation in SADC: From concept to implementation. Paper Presented at the 8th WaterNet/WARFSA/GWP-SA Symposium, Lusaka, Zambia.

  • Kistin, E. J. (2008, October). Evaluating effects of transboundary water cooperation on adaptive capacity—The case of the Orange-Senqu Basin. Paper prepared for the 9th WaterNet/WARFSA/GWP-SA Symposium, Johannesburg, South Africa.

  • Kistin, E. J., & Ashton, P. J. (2008). Adapting to change in transboundary rivers: An analysis of treaty flexibility on the Orange-Senqu River basin. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24, 385–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kistin, E. J., & Phillips, D. J. H. (2007, May). A critique of existing agreements on transboundary waters and proposals for creating effective cooperation between co-riparians. Paper presented at the Third International Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony, London School of Economics, London.

  • Lautze, J., & Giordano, M. (2005). Transboundary water law in Africa: Development, nature, and geography. Natural Resources Journal, 45, 1053–1087.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lautze, J., & Giordano, M. (2007). Demanding supply management and supplying demand management: Transboundary waters in sub-Saharan Africa. The Journal of Environment and Development, 16, 290–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, R. (2008). Engineer and Consultant, personal communication with E. J. Kistin, WRP Offices, Pretoria, South Africa, 16 January 2008.

  • Nkomo, S., & Van der Zaag, P. (2004). Equitable water allocation in a heavily committed international catchment area: The case of the Komati catchment. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 29, 1309–1317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallett, J. (1997). Sharing water in Southern Africa. Windhoek: Desert Research Foundation of Namibia.

    Google Scholar 

  • PWC (Permanent Water Commission). (2005). Pre-feasibility study into measures to improve the management of the lower Orange River and to provide for future developments along the border between Namibia and South Africa. DWA Namibia Report No: 400/8/1/P-13, DWAF RSA Report No: PB D000/00/4703, September 2005. Windhoek: Department of Water Affairs; Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.

  • Republic of South Africa. (1998). National Water Act (Act No. 36 of 1998). Pretoria: Government of the Republic of South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • SADC (Southern African Development Community). (1998). Regional Strategic Action Plan (RSAP) for Integrated Water Resources Development and Management in the SADC Countries (1999–2004). Summary Report. Maseru: SADC Water Sector Co-ordinating Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • SADC (Southern African Development Community). (2000). Protocol on shared watercourses in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Region. Windhoek: Southern African Development Community. Retrieved July 15, 2007, from www.sadc.int.

  • Struckmeier, W. F., Gilbrich, W. H., Gun, J.v. D., Maurer, T., Puri, S., Richts, A., et al. (2006). WHYMAP and the world map of transboundary aquifer systems at the scale of 1:50,000,000. Special Edition for the 4th World Water Forum, Mexico City, March 2006. Hanover: BGR and Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • TFDD. (2004). Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database. Oregon: Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University. Retrieved November 10, 2007, from http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/projects/internationalDB.html.

  • Turton, A. R. (2003). The political aspects of institutional developments in the water sector: South Africa and its international river basins. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Faculty of Humanities, University of Pretoria.

  • Turton, A. R. (2005, August). A critical assessment of the river basins at risk in the Southern African hydropolitical complex. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Management of International Rivers and Lakes, hosted by the Third World Centre for Water Management and the Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki.

  • Turton, A. R., & Ashton, P. J. (2008). Basin closure and issues of scale: The Southern African hydropolitical complex. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24, 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turton, A. R., Earle, A., Malzbender, D., & Ashton, P. J. (2006). Hydropolitical vulnerability and resilience along Africa’s international waters. In A. T. Wolf (Ed.), Hydropolitical resilience and vulnerability along international waters (pp. 19–67). Nairobi: United Nations Environment Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). (2002). Atlas of international freshwater agreements. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1997). Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses. United Nations General Assembly Document A/51/869. New York: United Nations Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zaag, P., & Vaz, A. C. (2003). Sharing the Incomati waters: Cooperation and competition in the balance. Water Policy, 5, 349–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zaag, P., Seyam, I. M., & Savenije, H. H. G. (2002). Towards objective criteria for the equitable sharing of international water resources. Water Policy, 4, 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaz, A. C. (1999). Problems in the management of international river basins—The case of the Incomati. In E. Mostert (Ed.), River Basin Management: Proceedings of the International Workshop, The Hague, 27–29 October 1999. UNESCO, Technical Documents in Hydrology. No. 31 (pp. 57–68). Paris: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization.

  • Wolf, A. T. (1999). Criteria for equitable allocations: The heart of international water conflict. Natural Resources Forum, 23, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, A. T., Yoffe, S. B., & Giordano, M. (2003). International waters: Identifying basins at risk. Water Policy, 5, 29–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony: A framework for analysis of transboundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8, 435–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Water Research Commission of South Africa for funding the initial study (Project K5/1515) into South Africa’s transboundary water treaties, and the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for funding research on shared river basins and aquifers in southern Africa. Comments from two anonymous reviewers helped to improve an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. J. Kistin.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 4 Chronological list of international freshwater agreements between South Africa and neighbouring states

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kistin, E.J., Ashton, P.J., Earle, A. et al. An overview of the content and historical context of the international freshwater agreements that South Africa has entered into with neighbouring countries. Int Environ Agreements 9, 1–21 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-008-9086-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-008-9086-2

Keywords

Navigation