Designing the United Nations Environment Programme: a story of compromise and confrontation

Abstract

The role of the United Nations in global environmental governance was determined in 1972 when a new international body for the global environment was created as a programme within the United Nations rather than as an autonomous specialized agency. A set of political dynamics between developed and developing countries led to the decisions on the functions, form, financing, and location of the new intergovernmental organization—the United Nations Environment Programme. This article traces the historical roots of these choices and exposes the motivations behind them.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    In 1969, industrial debris and oil in the Cuyahoga River in Ohio caught fire. One of President Nixon’s aides wrote that the political mood in Washington engendered by the public outcry could only be captured by the word hysteria (Buck 2006).

  2. 2.

    For a more detailed discussion of the “anchor institution” terminology, see Ivanova (2005). Can the Anchor Hold? Rethinking the United Nations Environment Programme for the 21st Century. New Haven, CT, Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies.

  3. 3.

    This point is made by Lynton Caldwell (1996).

  4. 4.

    In the United States, the movement had been building since the 1950s when “a New York case, Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission (1955) for the first time admitted scenic and recreational criteria in legal actions. In 1963, the Clean Air Act authorized federal hearings on potential air pollution problems; in 1964 the Wilderness Act set aside tracts of land and barred them permanently from development. In 1966, an early version of the Endangered Species Act was passed” (Buck 2006). In 1969, a major oil spill off the California coast led to public outcry. The first Earth Day, held in 1970, was largely a political affair. On January 1, 1970, President Nixon had signed the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), a significant piece of legislation that established the environmental priorities in the United States.

  5. 5.

    Maurice Strong had developed an interest in the UN as a very young man, long before he became Secretary-General of the Stockholm Conference. He followed many UN-related issues and, at the age of 18, traveled to New York to take a job as assistant pass officer in the Identification Unit of the Security Section in the United Nations. He lived with Noah Monod, then Treasurer of the UN and made connections, for example with David Rockefeller and John McCloy, which would prove critical to many of his subsequent endeavors in life (not just in the UN). For example, McCloy helped set up the World Bank and became its first president. He was also an assistant to Roosevelt’s secretary of war, Henry Stimson. McCloy was appointed to a presidential commission to respond to a Soviet proposal that the United Nations control future development of atomic power. McCloy recommended that the United States turn over all information to the UN. He continued this supportive stance of the UN as head of the US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency under President Kennedy and some say that he went so far as to promote the idea of turning all defense over to the UN through his Blueprint for the Peace Race: Outline of Basic Provision of a Treaty on General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World (Publication 4, General Series 3, May 3, 1962). Maurice Strong was thus influenced by people who genuinely believed in the United Nations’ mission and purpose.

  6. 6.

    Direct quotes from Åström (2003) have been translated from Swedish by the author.

  7. 7.

    See http://www.southcentre.org/publications/conundrum/conundrum-04.htm.

  8. 8.

    All data are for 2003 except for the OECD and WTO, which are for 2004. The GEF annual budget was estimated from the $3 billion in replenishment funds in 2003 used for its work programme over a four-year period. Sources: Organizations’ websites, referenced in the bibliography.

  9. 9.

    The Environment Fund for 2008–2009 amounts to $152 million.

  10. 10.

    As noted earlier, the office of the Secretary-General had not prepared analyses of the financial implications of all location bids assuming that the secretariat would remain in Geneva. The Second Committee requested that such a review be undertaken and it was quickly compiled based on questionnaires to the candidate countries. It revealed a cost of $2.3 million for Nairobi and $1.3 million for Geneva.

  11. 11.

    Joseph Odero-Jowi, Permanent Representative of Kenya to the United Nations, became the President of the Security Council in February 1973.

Abbreviations

ECOSOC:

UN Economic and Social Council

EPA:

Environmental Protection Agency

FAO:

Food and Agriculture Organization

G-77:

Group of 77

IAEA:

International Atomic Energy Agency

UNCTAD:

UN Conference on Trade and Environment

UNDP:

United Nations Development Programme

UNEO:

United Nations Environment Organization

UNEP:

United Nations Environment Programme

UNIDO:

UN Industrial Development Organization

WFP:

World Food Programme

WHO:

World Health Organization

WMO:

World Meteorological Organization

References

  1. Amin, A. (2005). UNEP – Reform perspectives two years after Johannesburg. In A. Rechkemmer (Ed.), UNEO – Towards an International Environment Organization (pp. 113–118). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Åström, S. (2003). Ögonblick: Från ett halvsekel i Ud-tjänst [Moment: From half a century of foreign affairs duty]. Stockholm: Lind & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bäckstrand, G. (1971). Samtal på den statliga kommiten för vetenskap och teknik (GKNT) [Conversation at the state committee for science and technology, Moscow between the Soviet Union (Ananichev) and Sweden (Bäckstrand and Swartz)], Utrikesdepartementet, Politiska Avdelningen, Fjärde byrån, Swedish Foreign Ministry archives.

  4. Bassow, W. (1979). The third world: Changing attitudes toward environmental protection. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, The Environment and the Quality of Life: A World View, 444(July), 112–120.

  5. Bauer, S., & Biermann, F. (2005). The debate on a world environment organization: An introduction. In F. Biermann & S. Bauer (Eds.), A world environment organization: Solution or threat for effective international environmental governance (pp. 9–30). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Billner, B. (1967). Statement by Mr. Börje Billner before the General Assembly on December 13, 1967, on agenda item 27, Question of holding further conferences on the peaceful use of atomic energy, Archives of Swedish Foreign Ministry.

  7. Buck, S. (2006). Understanding environmental administration and law. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Caldwell, L. K. (1996). International environmental policy: From the 20th century to the 21st century. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Calvert, P., & Calvert, S. (1999). The south, the north and the environment. New York: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Charnovitz, S. (2002). A world environment organization. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 27(2), 323–362.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Conca, K. (1995). Greening the United Nations: Environmental organisations and the UN system. Third World Quarterly, 16(3), 441–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DeSombre, E. (2006). Global environmental institutions. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  13. El-Ashry, M. (2004). Mainstreaming the environment – Coherence among international governance systems. Paper presented at the international environmental governance conference, Institute of Sustainable Development and International Relations, Paris.

  14. Elliott, L. (1998). The global politics of the environment. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Environmental Studies Board. (1972). Institutional arrangements for international environmental cooperation: A report to the Department of State by the Committee for International Environmental Programs. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

  16. EPA website. (2006). EPA’s Budget and Workforce 1970–2003. Retrieved August 10, 2006, from http://www.epa.gov/history/org/resources/budget.htm

  17. Gandhi, I. (1972). Life is one and the world is one. Prime Minister Indira Gandhi speaks to the plenary. Speech at the Stockholm conference on the human environment. Reprinted in Environment: Stockholm, p. 18. Geneva: Centre for Economic and Social Information at the United Nations European Heaquarters.

  18. Haas, P. (2005). When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process. In A. Rechkemmer (Ed.), UNEO – Towards an international environment organization: Approaches to a sustainable reform of global environmental governance (pp. 287–309). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harrison, G. (1977). Is there a United Nations Environment Programme? Special investigation at the request of the Ford Foundation. Unpublished. On file with author.

  20. Holdgate, M. W., Kassas, M., et al. (1982). The world environment 1972–1982. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ivanova, M. (2005). Can the anchor hold? Rethinking the United Nations Environment Programme for the 21st century. New Haven, CT: Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies. Retreived from http://www.environmentalgovernance.com/

  22. Kaniaru, D. (2004a). Personal interview. Nairobi, Kenya, July 2004.

  23. Kaniaru, D. (2004b). Kenya: A special honor to have the UNEP here. The Nation, December 19, 2007. Nairobi.

  24. Lewis, J. (1985). The birth of EPA. EPA Journal, (November). Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/history/topics/epa/15c.htm

  25. Najam, A. (2002). The case against GEO, WEO, or whatever-else-EO. In D. Brack & J. Hyvarinen (Eds.), Global environmental institutions: Perspectives on reform (pp. 367–384). London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Najam, A. (2003). The case against a new international environmental organization. Global Governance, 9(3), 367–384.

    Google Scholar 

  27. OECD (2004). OECD 2004 Annual Report. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

  28. Rowland, W. (1973). The plot to save the world: The life and times of the Stockholm conference on the human environment. Toronto: Clarke, Irwin & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Speth, J. G. (2005). A memorandum in favor of a world environment organization. In A. Rechkemmer (Ed.), UNEO – Towards an international environment organization (pp. 36–38). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Speth, J. G. (2004). Red sky at morning: America and the crisis of the global environment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Speth, J. G., & Haas, P. M. (2006). Global environmental governance. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stone, P. (1973). Did we save the Earth at Stockholm? London: Earth Island.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Strong, M. (1973). One year after Stockholm: An ecological approach to management. Foreign Affairs, 51, 703.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Töpfer, K. (2005). A strengthened international environmental institution. In A. Rechkemmer (Ed.), UNEO – Towards an international environmental organization (pp. 33–35). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  35. UN General Assembly. (1970). Report of the Secretary General, Official Record. A/CONF.48/PC.8. New York.

  36. UN General Assembly. (1971). 3rd Session. Report of the Secretary General. Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Official Record. A/CONF.48/PC.11. New York.

  37. UN General Assembly. (1972a). 27th session: Summary record of the 1466th meeting. Second Committee, Official Record. A/C.2/27/SR.1466. New York.

  38. UN General Assembly. (1972b). Consolidated document on the UN system and the human environment. Administrative Committee on Co-ordination. A/CONF.48/12. New York.

  39. UN General Assembly. (1972c). Resolution 2997 (XXVII): Institutional and financial arrangements for international environmental cooperation.

  40. UNDP (2004). UNDP annual report 2004: 2015: Mobilizing global partnerships. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

  41. UNEP (2004) Resource mobilization, environment fund. Retreived from http://www.unep.org/rmu/en/Financing_of_UNEP/Environment_Fund/index.asp

  42. United Nations. (1972). International organizational implications of action proposals: Conference on the human environment: Report by the Secretary-General. A/CONF.48/11/Add.1. Stockholm: Official Record.

  43. United Nations Press Release. (1971). Statement by the Secretary General of the UN Conference on the Human Environment. Second session of the Preparatory Committee for the conference. Geneva.

  44. United States. (1972). Stockholm and beyond: Report. Secretary of State’s Advisory Committee on the 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

  45. US Congress. (1973). Committee on Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee on International Organizations and Movements. Participation by the United States in the United Nations Environment Programme. 93rd Congress. First Session. (April 5 and 10, 1973).

  46. von Moltke, K. (1996). Why UNEP matters. In H. O. Bergesen & G. Parmann (Eds.), Green globe yearbook 1996 (pp. 55–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  47. von Moltke, K. (2001). The organization of the impossible. Global Environmental Politics, 1(1), 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. WHO (2004). Financial reports and audited financial statements 2004. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA57/A57_20-en.pdf

  49. WTO website. (2004). WTO Secretariat budget for 2004. Retrieved from http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/secre_e/budget04_e.htm

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Ivanova.

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2006 Annual Convention of the International Studies Association in San Diego, CA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ivanova, M. Designing the United Nations Environment Programme: a story of compromise and confrontation. Int Environ Agreements 7, 337–361 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-007-9052-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Developing countries
  • Global environmental governance
  • History of environmental governance
  • Institutional design
  • United Nations Environment Programme
  • UNEP
  • United States