Abstract
This paper discusses the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and its achievements and challenges in China, the country obtaining most GEF support. This paper relies on Chinese perceptions, and less on views from the implementing agencies (IAs), the World Bank, UNDP and UNEP. Most attention is given to climate change and biodiversity. The paper asks what has been achieved; how effective has the GEF been? The study concludes that GEF funding has been important for China’s environmental problems. GEF and its IAs have contributed to raised awareness and technology development and have boosted institutional capacity through participation in project activities and training. The main emphasis has been placed on climate change projects and less on biodiversity. Much has been achieved by the GEF in China, but challenges exist. At the international level, the interests and roles of the GEF system, its IAs and recipient countries are not always compatible. GEF projects may suffer as a consequence. Another challenge relates to the seeming difference in effectiveness between World Bank projects and projects of the other IAs. Domestic challenges concern turf battles, problems related to information sharing, and different priorities among actors. The various government institutions’ reluctance to co-operate impacts significantly on the performance of GEF projects in China. The IAs should insist on smoother collaboration, and force the institutions to work together. Moreover, severe problems are apparent regarding financing as well as application procedures. Improvements are under way regarding the GEF application procedures. This will have a limited impact unless the Chinese side simplifies and improves procedures.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Abbreviations
- ADB:
-
Asian Development Bank
- CICETE:
-
China International Centre for Economic and Technical Exchanges
- GEF:
-
Global Environment Facility
- IAs:
-
Implementing agencies
- IBRD:
-
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
- MOF:
-
Ministry of Finance
- NDRC:
-
National development and Reform Commission
- SEPA:
-
State Environmental Protection Administration
- SETC:
-
State Economic and Trade Commission
- UNDP:
-
United Nations Development Programme
References
ADB (2004a), ‘ADB Approves MOU for Direct Access to GEF Resources’, 24 June, www.adb.org/Media/Articles/2004/5297_others_access_to_gef/default.asp
ADB (2004b), ‘ADB Administering GEF-backed Project to Combat Land Degradation in Western PRC’, 29 June, www.adb.org/Documents/News/2004/nr2004072.asp
G. T. Allison (1972) Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Reading, MA, USA
S. Andresen J. Wettestad (2004) ‘Case Studies of the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes’ A. Underdal O. Young (Eds) Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Stategies, VIII Kluwer Academic Publishers/Springer Dordrecht 49–71
InstitutionalAuthorNameChina Environmental Yearbook Editing Committee (1990) Zhongguo Huanjing Nianjian 1990 (China Environmental Yearbook) , Zhongguo huanjing kexue chubanshe China Environmental Sciences Press Beijing
InstitutionalAuthorNameChina Statistics Press (Zhongguo tongji chubanshe) (2003) China Statistical Yearbook 2003 Zhongguo tongji nianjian Beijing
L. Christoffersen O. Davidson M. C. Donoso J. Fargher A. Hammond E. Hooper T. Mathew J. Seyani (2002) The First Decade of the GEF: Second Overall Performance Study Global Environment Facility Washington, DC
E. C. Economy (2004) The River Runs Black: The Environmental Challenge to China’s Future, A Council on Foreign Relations Book Cornell University Press Itacha and London
GEF (2002), China GEF Newsletter, Issue 1, September 2002, www.gefchina.org.cn/gef/english/more/details.asp?id=6
GEF Council (2001), The GEF Programmatic Approach: Current Understandings May 9–11
Good, L. (2004), Global Environment Facility, Some Thoughts on Environment and Development, Speech at the China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development, 2004 Annual General Meeting, Beijing, October 29.
G. Heggelund (2004) Environment and Resettlement Politics in China: The Three Gorges Project, Series: King’s SOAS Studies in Development Geography Ashgate Publishing Hampshire, UK
G. Heggelund (2003) The Significance of the UN Global Conferences on China’s Domestic Environmental Policymaking Fridtjof Nansen Institute Lysaker, Norway
E. L. Miles A. Underdal S. Andresen J. Wettestad J. B. Skjærseth E. M. Carlin (2002) Environmental Regime Effectiveness The MIT Press Cambridge, MA, USA
Office of the United Nations Resident Coordinator (2004), Millennium Development Goals: China’s Progress 2003, An Assessment by the UN Country Team in China, Beijing, China
InstitutionalAuthorNameProject Management Office (PMO), World Bank/GEF China Energy Conservation Project (2002) Progress Report 2002 State Economic and Trade Commission P.R.C., Beijing
A. Underdal O. R. Young (Eds) (2004) Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies, VIII Kluwer Academic Publishers/Springer Dordrecht 394
J. Werksman (2004) Consolidating Global Environmental Governance: New Lessons from the GEF K. Norichika P. Haas (Eds) Emerging Forces in Environmental Governance United Nations University Tokyo, Japan 35–51
World Bank, GEF Glossary E/F/S. Brief description: Global Environment Facility terms with some definitions. www.gefweb.org/gefgloss.doc
Wu Yanrui (2003) ArticleTitle‘Deregulation and Growth in China’s Energy Sector: a Review of Recent Development’ Energy Policy 31 1417–1425 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00202-1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heggelund, G., Andresen, S. & Ying, S. Performance of the Global Environmental Facility (GEF) in China: Achievements and Challenges as Seen by the Chinese. Int Environ Agreements 5, 323–348 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-005-3808-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-005-3808-5
Keywords
- achievements
- challenges
- China
- Chinese perceptions
- effectiveness
- GEF
- implementing agencies
- UNDP
- UNEP
- World Bank