Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reforming International Environmental Governance: An Institutionalist Critique of the Proposal for a World Environment Organisation

  • Published:
International Environmental Agreements Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article argues that a World Environment Organisation (WEO) does not promise to enhance international environmental governance. First, we claim that the establishment of an international organisation alone in a policy field currently populated by regimes cannot be expected to significantly improve environmental governance because there is no qualitative difference between these two forms of governance institutions. Second, we submit that significant improvement of international environmental governance through institutional re-arrangement must rely on a modification of decision-making procedures and/or a change of institutional boundaries. Third, we develop three principal models of a possible WEO. A WEO formally providing an umbrella for existing regimes without modifying issue-areas and decision-making procedures would be largely irrelevant. A WEO integrating decision-making processes of existing regimes so as to form comprehensive ‘world environment rounds’ of intergovernmental bargaining would be largely dysfunctional and prone to a host of negative side-effects. A ‘supranational’ WEO including large-scale use of majority decision-making and far-reaching enforcement mechanisms across a range of environmental issues might considerably enhance international environmental governance, but it appears to be grossly utopian. In conclusion, a WEO cannot be at the same time realistic, significant and beneficial for international environmental governance. Available political resources should be invested in advancing existing and emerging sectoral environmental regimes rather than in establishing a WEO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EU:

European Union

GATT:

General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

GMEF:

Global Ministerial Environment Forum

ILO:

International Labour Organization

UNECE:

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe

UNEP:

United Nations Environment Programme

WEO:

World Environment Organisation

WTO:

World Trade Organization

References

  • K.W. Abbott D. Snidal (1998) ArticleTitle‘Why States Act through Formal International Organizations’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 IssueID1 3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • M.N. Barnett M. Finnemore (1999) ArticleTitle‘The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations’ International Organization 53 IssueID4 699–732

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Beisheim S. Dreher G. Walter B. Zangl M. Zürn (1999) Im Zeitalter der Globalisierung? Thesen und Daten zur gesellschaftlichen und politischen Denationalisierung Nomos Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Biermann (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Case for a World Environment Organization’ Environment 42 IssueID9 22–31

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Biermann (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Emerging Debate on the Need for a World Environment Organization: A Commentary’ Global Environmental Politics 1 IssueID1 45–55

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Biermann (2002) ArticleTitle‘Strengthening Green Global Governance in a Disparate World Society: Would a World Environment Organisation Benefit the South?’, International Environmental Agreements: Politics Law and Economics 2 IssueID4 297–315

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Brack (2002) ‘Environmental Treaties and Trade: Multilateral Environmental Agreements and the Multilateral Trading System’ G.P. Sampson W. Bradney Chambers (Eds) Trade, Environment, and the Millennium EditionNumber2 UN University Press Tokyo 321–352

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Charnovitz (1996) ArticleTitle‘Trade Measures and the Design of International Regimes’ Journal of Environment and Development 5 IssueID2 168–196

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Charnovitz (1998) ArticleTitle‘The World Trade Organization and the Environment’ Yearbook of International Environmental Law 8 98–116

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Charnovitz (2002) ArticleTitle‘A World Environment Organization’ Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 27 IssueID2 321–357

    Google Scholar 

  • R.R. Churchill G. Ulfstein (2000) ArticleTitle‘Autonomous Institutional Arrangements in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Little-Noticed Phenomenon in International Law’ The American Journal of International Law 94 623–659

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Cornes T. Sandler (1999) The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods EditionNumber2 Cambridge UP Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • H.B. de la Cruz G. Potobsky L. Swepston (1996) The International Labor Organization: The International Standards System and Basic Human Rights. Westview Press Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • E.R. DeSombre J. Kauffman (1996) ‘The Montreal Protocol Multilateral Fund: Partial Success Story’ R.O. Keohane M.A. Levy (Eds) Institutions for Environmental Aid: Pitfalls and Promise Cambridge, MA MIT Press 89–126

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Edelman (1967) The Symbolic Uses of Politics University of Illinois Press Urbana, Chicago, London

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Ehrmann (2000) Erfüllungskontrolle im Umweltvölkerrecht – Verfahren der Erfüllungskontrolle in der umweltvölkerrechtlichen Vertragspraxis Nomos Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Elster (1989) The Cement of Society. A Study of Social Order Cambridge UP Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • D.C. Esty (1994) Greening the GATT. Trade, Environment and the Future. Institute for International Economics Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D. C. and M. Ivanova (2001): Making International Environmental Agreements Work: The Case for a Global Environmental Organization, Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy Working Paper Series, Working Paper 2/1. New Haven, May 2001.

  • D.C. Esty M. Ivanova (2002) ‘Revitalizing Global Environmental Governance: A Function Driven Approach’ D.C. Esty M. Ivanova (Eds) Global Environmental Governance: Options and Opportunities Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies New Haven, CT 181–204

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Gehring (1994) Dynamic International Regimes: Institutions for International Environmental Governance Peter Lang Frankfurt/Main

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Gehring (2002) Die Europäische Union als komplexe internationale Organisation: Wie durch Kommunikation und Entscheidung soziale Ordnung entsteht. Nomos Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Gross Stein (1989) ‘Getting to the Table: The Triggers, Stages, Functions, and Consequences of Pre-negotiation’ J. Gross Stein (Eds) Getting to the Table: The Processes of International Pre-negotiation Johns Hopkins UP Baltimore 239–268

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Gupta (2002) ArticleTitle‘Global Sustainable Development Governance: Institutional Challenges from a Theoretical Perspective’, International Environmental Agreements: Politics Law and Economics 2 IssueID4 361–388

    Google Scholar 

  • E.B. Haas (1975) ArticleTitle‘Is There a Hole in the Whole? Knowledge, Technology, Interdependence, and the Construction of International Regimes’ International Organization 29 IssueID3 827–876

    Google Scholar 

  • P.M. Haas (1992) ArticleTitle‘Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic Community Efforts to Protect Stratospheric Ozone’ International Organization 46 IssueID1 187–224

    Google Scholar 

  • P.M. Haas R.O. Keohane M.A. Levy (Eds) (1993) Institutions for the Earth. Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. MIT Press Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • B.M. Hoekman M.M. Kostecki (1995) The Political Economy of the World Trading System. From GATT to WTO Oxford UP Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • J.H. Jackson (1999) The World Trading System. Law and Policy of International Economic Relations EditionNumber2 MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Jacquemont A. Caparrós (2002) ArticleTitle‘The Convention on Biological Diversity and the Climate Change Convention 10 Years After Rio: Towards a Synergy of the Two Regimes?’ Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 11 IssueID2 139–180

    Google Scholar 

  • R.O. Keohane (1989) International Institutions and State Power. Essays in International Relations Theory. Westview Press Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • R.O. Keohane (1993) ‘The Analysis of International Regimes: Towards a European-American Research Programme’ V. Rittberger (Eds) Regime Theory and International Relations Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Koremenos C. Lipson D. Snidal (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Rational Design of International Institutions’ International Organization 55 IssueID4 761–799

    Google Scholar 

  • D.A. Lax J.K. Sebenius (1986) The Manager as Negotiator. Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain. Free Press New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • M.A. Levy O.R. Young M. Zürn (1995) ArticleTitle‘The Study of International Regimes’ European Journal of International Relations 1 267–330

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Majone (1997) ArticleTitle‘The New European Agencies. Regulation by Information’ Journal of European Public Policy 4 IssueID2 262–275

    Google Scholar 

  • E.L. Miles A. Underdal S. Andresen K. Lee J.B. Skjærseth J. Wettestad (2001) Explaining Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • K.A. Mingst M.P. Karns (2000) United Nations in the Post-Cold War Era Westview Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Moravcsik (1998) The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Cornell University Press Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Najam (2003) ArticleTitle‘The Case against a New International Environmental Organization’ Global Governance 9 IssueID3 367–384

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Oberthür (2002) ArticleTitle‘Clustering of Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Potentials and Limitations’, International Environmental Agreements: Politics Law and Economics 2 IssueID4 317–340

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Oberthür S. Marr (2002) ArticleTitle‘Das System der Erfüllungskontrolle des Kyoto-Protokolls: Ein Schritt zur wirksamen Durchsetzung im Umweltvölkerrecht’ Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht 13 IssueID2 81–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberthür, S. and T. Gehring (2003), ‘Institutional Interaction: Toward a Systematic Analysis’, 2003 International Studies Association Annual Convention, Portland, 26 February – 1 March 2003.

  • M. Olson (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard UP Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • R.L. Paarlberg (1999) ‘Lapsed Leadership: U.S. International Environmental Policy Since Rio’ N.J. Vig R.S. Axelrod (Eds) The Global Environment: Institutions, Law, and Policy Congressional Quarterly Press Washington, DC 236–255

    Google Scholar 

  • E.A. Parson (2003) Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science, Strategy, and Negotiation in the Shaping of a Global Environmental Regime Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Pierson (1996) ArticleTitle‘The Path to European Integration. A Historical Institutionalist Analysis’ Comparative Political Studies 29 IssueID2 123–163

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Pollack (2003) The Engines of European Integration. Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU. Oxford UP Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • C.M. Pontecorvo (1999) ArticleTitle‘Interdependence between Global Environmental Regimes: The Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change and Forest Protection’ Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 59 IssueID3 709–749

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Risse (2000) ArticleTitle‘Let’s Argue!’ Communicative Action in World Politics’ International Organization 54 IssueID1 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • C.F. Runge (2001) ArticleTitle‘A Global Environment Organization (GEO) and the World Trading System’ Journal of World Trade 35 IssueID4 399–426

    Google Scholar 

  • P.H. Sand (Eds) (1992) The Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements. A Survey of Existing Legal Instruments. Cambridge UP Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • F.W. Scharpf (1991) ArticleTitle‘Games Real Actors Could Play. The Challenge of Complexity’ Journal of Theoretical Politics 3 IssueID3 277–304

    Google Scholar 

  • J.K. Sebenius (1983) ArticleTitle‘Negotiation Arithmetics: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties’ International Organization 37 IssueID2 281–316

    Google Scholar 

  • J.K. Sebenius (1984) Negotiating the Law of the Sea Harvard UP Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • B.A. Simmons L.L. Martin (2002) ‘International Organizations and Institutions’ W. Carlsnaes T. Risse B.A. Simmons (Eds) Handbook of International Relations Sage London 192–211

    Google Scholar 

  • R.D. Tollison T.D. Willett (1979) ArticleTitle‘An Economic Theory of Mutually Advantageous Issue Linkages in International Negotiations’ International Organization 33 IssueID4 425–449

    Google Scholar 

  • D.G. Victor K. Raustiala E.B. Skolnikoff (Eds) (1998) The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice MIT Press Cambridge, MA, and London

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameUNEP (2002) Global Environment Outlook 3 Earthscan London

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameWBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change) (2001) World in Transition: New Structures for Global Environmental Policy Earthscan London

    Google Scholar 

  • J.H.H. Weiler (1991) ArticleTitle‘The Transformation of Europe’ Yale Law Journal 100 IssueID8 2403–2483

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Whalley B. Zissimos (2001) ArticleTitle‘What Could a World Environmental Organization Do?’ Global Environmental Politics 1 IssueID1 29–44

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Whalley B. Zissimos (2002) ‘Making Environmental Deals: The Economic Case for a World Environment Organization’ D.C. Esty M. Ivanova (Eds) Global Environmental Governance: Options and Opportunities Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies New Haven, CT 163–180

    Google Scholar 

  • N.D. White (2002) The United Nations System. Toward International Justice. Lynne Rienner Boulder, London

    Google Scholar 

  • O.E. Williamson (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. Free Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O.R. Young (1994) International Governance. Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society. Cornell UP Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • O.R. Young (Eds) (1999) The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioural Mechanisms MIT Press Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Otto-Friedrich University Bamberg, Feldkirchenstr. 21, 96045, Bamberg, Germany

    Sebastian Oberthür & Thomas Gehring

Authors
  1. Sebastian Oberthür
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Gehring
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Oberthür.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oberthür, S., Gehring, T. Reforming International Environmental Governance: An Institutionalist Critique of the Proposal for a World Environment Organisation. Int Environ Agreements 4, 359–381 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-004-3095-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-004-3095-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation