Skip to main content
Log in

Is ‘ātmā vā are draṣṭavyaḥ, śrotavyaḥ…’ a vidhivākya or not? A Discussion from Appayya’s Siddhāntaleśasaṅgraha

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Siddhāntaleśasaṅgraha (SLS) written by Appayyadīkshitar (Appayya) in the seventeenth century is one of the rare texts where the author brings together the different views of Advaita present at his time. The book itself starts with the controversy surrounding whether the sentence “śrotavyaḥ…” is a vidhi-vākya or not. This paper attempts to summarize the various approaches to this question in the SLS and gives us a glimpse as to how the debate was conducted. Even though the SLS was translated by Suryanarayana Sastri in 1933 the vocabulary and the style is so out-dated that it was not of much use. I then decided to do a fresh translation of the SLS and have succeeded only in translating the first uddeśa. I have condensed the arguments presented in the SLS under some broad headings and thus tried to recreate the arguments presented in the text.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal, M. M. (2001). Six systems of Indian Philosophy: The Sūtras of six systems of Indian Philosophy. Delhi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Pratishthan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian, R. (Ed.). (1988). The Naiṣkarmyasiddhi of Sureśvara. Madras: University of Madras.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambhirananda, S. (2006). Brahmasutrabhasya of Shankaracharya, English Translation, Ninth impression. Kolkata: Advaita Ashrama.

  • Limaye, V. P., & Vadekar, R. D. (1958). Eighteen Principal Upaniṣads. Poona: Vaidika Saṃśodhana Maṇḍala. The following Upaniṣads: Aitareya, Br̥hadāraṇyaka, Kaṭha, Munḍaka, Taittirīya.

  • Revati, S. (1990). Three little known Advaitins. Madras: University of Madras.

    Google Scholar 

  • Śāstrī, A. (1938). The Brahmasūtra Śāṅkara Bhāṣya with the commentaries Bhāmatī, Kalpataru and Parimal. Readings and index by Bhārgav Śāstrī (2nd ed.). Bombay: Nirṇaya Sāgar Press, Reprint 1985, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

  • Sastri, K., & Veezhinathan, N. (Eds.). (1973). Sastra-Siddhanta-Lesa-Sangraha with the commentary of Acyutakr̥̥ṣṇānanda-Tīrtha (1st ed.). Secunderabad: Śrīmad-Appayya-Dīkṣithendra-Granthāvali Prakāśana-Samiti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Śrīmadacyutakr̥ṣṇānandatīrtha. (1992). Śrīmadacyutakr̥̥ṣṇānandatīrthakr̥̥takr̥̥ṣṇālaṅkāravyākhyāsametaḥ with his own Hindi commentary. Varanasi.

  • Suryanarayana Sastri, S. S. (1935, 1937). The Siddhāntaleśasaṅgraha of Appayya Dīkṣita (Vols. I & II). Madras: University of Madras.

Download references

Acknowledgements

A few years ago I had the rare opportunity of reading the Siddhāntaleśasaṅgraha (SLS) with Professor Krishnamurti Sastrigal, retired Principal of the Mylapore Sanskrit College and an eminent Advaita scholar. I am grateful to him for his help in clarifying some technical details an Advaita and some of the ritualistic (karmakāṇḍa) nuances which were unknown to me.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. S. Rukmani.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rukmani, T.S. Is ‘ātmā vā are draṣṭavyaḥ, śrotavyaḥ…’ a vidhivākya or not? A Discussion from Appayya’s Siddhāntaleśasaṅgraha. J Indian Philos 47, 405–420 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-019-09386-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-019-09386-1

Keywords

Navigation