Journal of Indian Philosophy

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 355–372 | Cite as

The Tantric Context of Ratnākaraśānti’s Philosophy of Mind

Article

Abstract

The conflicting positions of the two early eleventh century Yogācāra scholars, Ratnākaraśānti and his critic Jñānaśrīmitra, concerning whether or not consciousness can exist without content (ākāra) are inseparable from their respective understandings of enlightenment. Ratnākaraśānti argues that consciousness can be contentless (nirākāra)—and that, for a buddha, it must be. Mental content can be defeated by reasoning and made to disappear by meditative cultivation, and so it is fundamentally distinct (bheda) from the nature of consciousness, which is never defeated and never ceases. That mental content is thus separable from the nature of consciousness is unimaginable to Jñānaśrīmitra, who argues that all mental content cannot be so defeated, nor can it disappear completely, and who concludes that Ratnākaraśānti’s commitment to this idea can be based on nothing but faith (śraddhā). Contra Jñānaśrīmitra, I will suggest that Ratnākaraśānti’s view is based not only on faith, but is also driven by a certain (often implicit) theory of buddhahood, the implications of which he is committed to working out. Because Ratnākaraśānti’s theory of buddhahood is developed in part in his tantric work, our understanding of his position benefits from our reading it in this context, wherein buddhahood and the most effective techniques for attaining it are explored.

Keywords

Ratnākaraśānti Jñānaśrīmitra ākāra ānanda Buddhist tantra Buddhist philosophy of mind 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Abbreviations

  1. JNĀ: Thakur, A. (Ed.) (1987). Jñānaśrīmitranibandhāvali. Patna: Prasad Jayaswal Research Institute.Google Scholar
  2. HT: Hevajra Tantra. In MuĀv. Cf. Snellgrove (1959).Google Scholar
  3. MAU: Ratnākaraśānti. Madhyamakālaṃkāropadeśa. Tibetan translation: dBu ma rgyan gyi man ngag, translated by Śāntibhadra & Śākya ’od. dPe bsdur ma edition of the Tibetan Buddhist Canon. Vol. 78, 3314. Beijing: Krung goʾi Bod kyi shes rig dpe skrun khang, 1994–2005Google Scholar
  4. MAV/MPS: Ratnākaraśānti. Madhyamakālaṃkāravṛtti-Madhyamapratipatsiddhi. Tibetan translation: dBu ma rgyan gyi ’grel pa dbu ma’i lam grub pa, translated by Śākya ’od. dPe bsdur ma edition of the Tibetan Buddhist Canon. Vol. 78, 3301. Beijing: Krung goʾi Bod kyi shes rig dpe skrun khang, 1994–2005.Google Scholar
  5. MuĀv: Tripathi, R. S. & Negi, T. S. (Eds.) (2001). Hevajratantram with Muktāvalī Pañjikā of Mahāpaṇḍitācārya Ratnākaraśānti. Sarnath: Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies.Google Scholar
  6. PPU: Ratnākaraśānti. Prajñāpāramitopadeśa. Tibetan translation: Shes rab kyi pha rol tu phyin pa’i man ngag, translated by Zhi ba bzang po & ’Gos lhas btsas. dPe bsdur ma edition of the Tibetan Buddhist Canon. Vol. 78, 3304. Beijing: Krung goʾi Bod kyi shes rig dpe skrun khang, 1994–2005.Google Scholar
  7. PV: Miyasaka, Y. (Ed.) (1971–1972). Pramāṇavārttika-kārikā (Sanskrit and Tibetan). Acta Indologica, 2, 1–206.Google Scholar
  8. PVin: Steinkellner, E. (Ed.) (2007). Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇaviniścaya, Chapters 1 and 2. Beijing/Vienna: China Tibetology Publishing House/Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.Google Scholar

References

  1. Arnold, D. (2012). Brains, buddhas, and believing: The problem of intentionality in classical buddhist thought and cognitive-scientific philosophy of mind. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentor, Y. (2002). Fourfold meditations: Outer, inner, secret and suchness. In Henk Blezer (Ed.), Religion and secular culture in Tibet (pp. 41–55). Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
  3. Blumenthal, J. (2009). Śāntarakṣita’s “neither-one-nor-many” argument from Madhyamakālaṃkāra (The ornament of the middle way): A classical buddhist argument on the ontological status of phenomena. In W. Edelglass & J. L. Garfield (Eds.), Buddhist philosophy: Essential readings (pp. 46–60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brunnhölzl, K. (2011). Prajñāpāramitā, Indian “gzhan stong pas”, And the beginning of the Tibetan gzhan stong. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien.Google Scholar
  5. Dunne, J. D. (2004). Foundations of Dharmakīrti’s philosophy. Somerville: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Isaacson, H. (2000). The opening verses of Ratnākaraśānti’s Muktāvalī (Studies in Ratnākaraśānti’s tantric works II). In R. Tsuchida & A. Wezler (Eds.), Harānandalaharī: volume in honour of Professor Minoru Hara on his seventieth birthday (pp. 121–134). Reinbek: Dr. Inge Wezler Verlag für Orientalistische Fachpublikationen.Google Scholar
  7. Isaacson, H. (2001). Ratnākaraśānti’s Hevajrasahajasadyoga (Studies in Ratnākaraśānti’s Tantric Works I). In R. Torella (Ed.), Le Parole E I Marmi (pp. 457–487). Rome: Instituto Italiano per L’Africa e L’Oriente.Google Scholar
  8. Isaacson, H. (2013). Yogācāra and Vajrayāna according to Ratnākaraśānti. In U. T. Kragh (Ed.), The foundation for yoga practitioners: The Buddhist Yogācārabhūmi treatise and its adaptation in India, East Asia, and Tibet (pp. 1036–1051). Harvard Oriental Series 75. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Isaacson, H., & Sferra, F. (2014). The Sekanirdeśa of Maitreyanātha (Advayavajra) With the Sekanirdeśapañjikā of Rāmapāla. Critical Edition of the Sanskrit and Tibetan texts, English translation, and Facsimiles. Manuscripta Buddhica 2. Naples: Universitá Degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”.Google Scholar
  10. Iwata, T. (1991). Sahopalambhaniyama: Struktur und Entwicklung des Schlusses von der Tatsache, daß Erkenntnis und Gegenstand ausschließlich zusammen wahrgenommen werden, auf deren Nichtverschiedenheit (2 Vols.). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
  11. Kajiyama, Y. (1998). An Introduction to Buddhist Philosophy: An annotated translation of the Tarkabhāṣā of Mokṣākaragupta. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien.Google Scholar
  12. Kano, K. (2015). Ratnākaraśānti’s understanding of Buddha-nature. China Tibetology Journal, 25, 52–77.Google Scholar
  13. Kano, K. (2016). Jñānaśrīmitra on the Ratnagotravibhāga. Tōyōbunka kenkyūjo kiyō, 96, 7–48.Google Scholar
  14. Kapstein, M. (2001). Reasons traces: Identity and interpretation in Indian and Tibetan Buddhist Thought. Boston: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Kellner, B. & McClintock, S. L. (Eds.). (2014). ākāra in Buddhist Philosophical and Soteriological Analysis. Journal of Indian Philosophy 42(2–3), 282.Google Scholar
  16. Luo, H. (2013). The opening verses of Ratnākaraśānti’s Prajñāpāramitopadeśa. Maitreya Studies, 1, 18–29.Google Scholar
  17. Makransky, J. J. (1997). Buddhahood embodied: Sources of controversy in India and Tibet. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  18. Matsumoto, S. (1980). Sahopalambhaniyama. Sōtōshū Kenkyūin Kenkyūsei Kenkyū Kiyō, 12, 1–34.Google Scholar
  19. Moriyama, S. (2014). Ratnākaraśānti’s Theory of Cognition with False Mental Images (*alīkākāravāda) and the Neither-One-Nor-Many Argument. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 42, 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Onians, I. (2002). Tantric Buddhist apologetics, or antinomianism as a norm. D.Phil. Dissertation, Oxford University.Google Scholar
  21. Pandey, J. (1996). Tattvaratnāvalokaḥ with Vivaraṇa of Mahāpaṇḍita-Vāgīśvarakīrti. Dhīḥ, 21, 129–149.Google Scholar
  22. Patil, P. G. (2009). Against a Hindu God: Buddhist philosophy of religion in India. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seton, G. M. (2015). Defining Wisdom: Ratnākaraśānti’s Sāratamā. D.Phil. Dissertation, Oxford University.Google Scholar
  24. Snellgrove, D. L. (1959). The Hevajra Tantra: A critical study. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Taber, J. (2010). Kumarila’s Buddhist. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 38, 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Takasaki, J. (1966). A study on the Ratnagotravibhāga (Uttaratantra): Being a treatise on the Tathāgatagarbha theory of Mahāyāna Buddhism. Serie Orientale Roma 33. Rome: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.Google Scholar
  27. Woo, J. (2012). Buddhist theory of Momentariness and Yogipratyakṣa. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 55, 1–13.Google Scholar
  28. Woo, J. (2014). On the yogic path to enlightenment in later Yogācāra. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 42, 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations