Journal of Indian Philosophy

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 437–454 | Cite as

How to Deal with Future Existence: sarvāstivāda, Yogic Perception, and Causality

Article
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

This paper mainly addresses the following issues: how Buddhists deal with future existence, the difference between yogic perception and the cognition of ordinary people with regard to future entities, and how Buddhists resolve the contradiction between the theory of momentariness and that of action and its fruit. According to the Sarvāstivādins, a future entity exists in reality as long as there is cognition that has this entity as its object. According to the Sautrāntikas, however, that theory does not hold true. A future entity is just what will occur hereafter, and it is never the case that such an entity exists at present. Śāntarakṣita and Kamalaśīla do not directly negate an opponent’s argument that the distinction between past and future entities is made by yogic perception, but implicitly accept it. They state that because a future entity is situated in a causal stream (saṃtāna), yogis can cognize it through purified worldly cognition (śuddhalaukikajñāna). As for an effect that will occur in the future, Buddhists do not seem to follow the model that one and the same agent of action will necessarily receive the fruit of past action, which is often seen in other schools such as the Naiyāyikas and Mīmāṃsakas. Rather, Buddhists adopt the theory of the uninterrupted succession of cause and effect.

Keywords

sarvāstivāda Sautrāntika Causality Śāntarakṣita Kamalaśīla Yogic perception saṃtāna 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Prof. Phyllis Granoff (Yale University), Prof. Eli Franco (Leipzig University), and Prof. Kei Kataoka (Kyūshū University) for providing valuable comments and suggestions before and during the workshop. This research was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Nos. 15H03159 and 15K02047.

References

Primary Sources and Abbreviations

  1. AK = Abhidharmakośa (Vasubandhu): P. Pradhan (Ed.), Abhidharmakośabhāṣya of Vasubandhu, Patna 1967.Google Scholar
  2. AKBh = Abhidharmakośabhāṣya (Vasubandhu): see AK.Google Scholar
  3. AKBhṬ = Abhidharmakośabhāṣyaṭīkā Tattvārthā nāma (Sthiramati): (Tib.) D4421; P5875.Google Scholar
  4. AKVy = Sphūṭārthā Abhidharmakośavyākhyā (Yaśomitra): U. Wogihara (Ed.), Sphūṭārthā Abhidharmakośavyākhyā: The work of Yaśomitra, Tokyo 1932.Google Scholar
  5. ADV = Abhidharmadīpavibhāṣāprabhāvtti (anonymous): P. S. Jaini (Ed.), Abhidharmadīpa with Vibhāṣāprabhāvtti, Patna 1977.Google Scholar
  6. TBh = Tarkabhāṣā (Mokṣākaragupta): H. R. R. Iyengar (Ed.), Tarkabhāṣā and Vādasthāna of Mokṣākaraguputa and Jitāripāda, Mysore 1952.Google Scholar
  7. TS = Tattvasaṃgrahakārikā (Śāntarakṣita): S. D. Shastri (Ed.), (1) Tattvasaṅgraha of Ācārya Shāntarakṣita with the Commentary ‘Pañjikā’ of Shri Kamalashīla, 2 vols. Varanasi 1968 (repr. Varanasi 1981) (= S). (2) E. Krishnamacharya (Ed.), Tattvasaṃgraha of Śāntarakṣita with the Commentary of Kamalaśīla, 2 vols. Baroda 1926. (repr. Baroda 1984 and 1988) (= K). (3) Jaisalmer Manuscript (= J).Google Scholar
  8. TSP = Tattvasaṃgrahapañjikā (Kamalaśīla): see TS.Google Scholar
  9. NB = Nyāyabindu (Dharmakīrti): D. Malvania (Ed.), Paṇḍita Durveka Miśra’s Dharmottarapradīpa [Being a Sub-commentary on Dharmottara’s Nyāyabinduṭīkā, a Commentary on Dharmakīrti’s Nyāyabindu], Patna 1955.Google Scholar
  10. NBṬ = Nyāyabinduṭīkā (Dharmottara): see NB.Google Scholar
  11. PV 1 = Pramāṇavārttika-kārikā, chapter 1 (svārthānumāna): see PVSV.Google Scholar
  12. PV 2 = Pramāṇavārttika-kārikā, chapter 2 (pramāṇasiddhi): see PVA.Google Scholar
  13. PVA = Pramāṇavārttikālaṅkāra (Prajñākaragupta): R. Sāṅkr̥tyāyana (Ed.), Pramāṇavārtikabhāshyam or Vārtikālaṅkāraḥ of Prajñākaraguputa, Patna 1953.Google Scholar
  14. PVSV = Pramānavārttikasvavtti (Dharmakīrti): R. Gnoli (Ed.), The Pramāṇavārttikam of Dharmakīrti. The First Chapter with the Autocommentary, Roma 1960.Google Scholar
  15. YBh = Yogabhāṣya (Vyāsa?): Kāśīnātha Śāstrī Āgāśe (Ed.) Pātañjalayogasūtrāṇi, Poona 1904.Google Scholar
  16. YS = Yogasūtra (Patañjali): see YBh.Google Scholar
  17. D = sDe dge edtition of Tibetan Tripiṭaka.Google Scholar
  18. P = Peking edition of Tibetan Tripiṭaka.Google Scholar
  19. Taisho = Taisho edition of Chinese Tripiṭaka.Google Scholar
  20. T = Tibetan translation.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Akimoto, M., & Honjō, Y. (1978). Kusharon—Sanzejitsuusetsu [Abhidharmakośabhāṣyasarvāstivāda]. Nantobukkyō, 41, 84–105.Google Scholar
  2. Cox, C. (1988). On the possibility of a nonexistent object of consciousness: Sarvāstivādin and Dārṣṭāntika theories. The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 11(1), 31–87.Google Scholar
  3. Cox, C. (1995). Disputed Dharmas. Early Buddhist Theories on Existence. An annotated translation of the section on factors dissociated from thought from Saṅghabhadra’s Nyāyānusāra. Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Funahashi, I. (1954). Gō no kenkyū [A study on karman]. Kyoto: Hōzōkan.Google Scholar
  5. Franco, E. (2007). Prajñākaragupta on pratītyasamutpāda and reverse causation. In B. Kellner et al. (Eds.), Pramāṇakīrti 1 (pp. 163–185). Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.Google Scholar
  6. Franco, E. (2011). Perception of yogis—Some epistemological and metaphysical considerations. In H. Krasser et al. (Ed.), Religion and logic in Buddhist Philosophical Analysis. Proceedings of the fourth international Dharmakīrti conference, Vienna, 23–27 August 2005 (pp. 81–98). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  7. Franco, E (2015). Jitāri on backward causation. In K. L. Dhammajoti (Ed.), Buddhist meditative Praxis. Traditional teachings & modern applications (pp. 81–115). Hong Kong: The Centre of Buddhist Studies, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  8. Frauwallne, E. (1973). Abhidharma-Studien: V. Der Sarvāstivādaḥ. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd- und Ostasiens, 17, 97–121.Google Scholar
  9. Kajiyama, Y. (1977). Realism of the Sarvāstivāda School. In: L. S. Kawamura & K. Scott (Eds.), Buddhist thought and Asian Civilization, essays in honor of Herbert V. Guenther on his sixtieth birthday (pp. 114–131). Cazadero: Dharma Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Kajiyama, Y. (1998). An introduction to Buddhist Philosophy. An annotated translation of the Tarkabhāṣā of Mokṣākaraguputa. Reprint with corrections in the author’s hand. Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.Google Scholar
  11. Kajiyama, Y. (2011). In K. Mimaki (Ed.), Kajiyama Yūichi chosakushū. Dai 8 kan. Gōhō to Rinne/Bukkyō to Gendai tono setten [The collection of the works of Prof. Y. Kajiyama, Vol. 8]. Tokyo: Shunjūsha.Google Scholar
  12. Kajiyama, Y. (2013). In T. Fukita (Ed.), Kajiyama Yūichi chosakushū. Dai 1 kan. Bukkyōshisōshiron [The collection of the works of Prof. Y. Kajiyama, Vol. 1]. Tokyo: Shunjūsha.Google Scholar
  13. Katsura, Sh. (2002). Sonzai toha nanika—Dharmakīrti no shiten—[What is existence?—From Dharmakīrti’s point of view]. Ryūkokudaigaku-bukkyōbunkakenkyūjo-kiyō, 41, 263–275.Google Scholar
  14. Kawasaki, Sh. (1984). VII Issaichisha no sonzai-ronshō [The proof of the existence of sarvajña]. In A. Hirakawa, Y. Kajiyama, & J. Takasaki (Eds.), Kōza-daijōbukkyō 9. Ninshikiron to ronrigaku [Epistemology and logic] (pp. 293–339). Tokyo: Shunjūsha,.Google Scholar
  15. Kawasaki, Sh. (1992). Issaichisha-shisō no kenkyū [A study of the thoughts on sarvajña]. Tokyo: Shunjūsha.Google Scholar
  16. Kitagawa, H. (1965). Indo-koten-ronrigaku no kenkyū—Jinna (Dignāga) no taikei—[A study of classical Indian logic—The system of Dignāga—]. Tokyo: Suzuki-gakujutsu-zaidan.Google Scholar
  17. Moriyama, Sh. (1998). Raise no ronshō ni miru Prajñākaragupta no miraigeninsetsu [Can the next life be proved from the present life? Prajñākaragupta’s peculiar theory of causality (bhāvikāraṇa-vāda) in the context of his proof of the paraloka]. Indo-tetsugaku-bukkyōgaku-kenkyū, 5, 44–57.Google Scholar
  18. Odani, N., & Honjō, Y. (2007). Kusharon no gentenkenkyū. Zuiminbon [A study of the Sanskrit text of the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya. Anuśaya-nirdeśa]. Tokyo: Daizoshuppan.Google Scholar
  19. Ono, M. (1994). Prajñākaragupta niyoru Dharmakīrti no pramāṇa no teigi no kaishaku—Prajñākaragupta no shinriron—[Prajnakaragupta’s interpretation of Dharmakirti’s definition of pramāṇa—Prajnakaragupta’s theory of truth]. Indogaku-bukkyōgaku-kenkyū, 42(2), 878–885.Google Scholar
  20. Sakurabe, H. (1969). Kusharon no kenkyū. Kai, Konbon [A study of the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya. Dhātu-nirdeśa, Indriya-nirdeśa]. Kyoto: Hōzōkan.Google Scholar
  21. Schayer, S. (1938). Contribution to the problem of time in Indian Philosophy. Kraków: Nakładem Polskiej Akademii Umieje̜tności.Google Scholar
  22. Shiga, K. (2015a). Bukkyō niokeru sonzai to jikan: sanzejitsuuron womeguru syomondai wo saikōsuru [Existence and time in Buddhism: Reconsidering the problems concerning sarvāstivāda]. Indotetsugaku-bukkyōgaku-kenkyū, 22, 151–174.Google Scholar
  23. Shiga, K. (2015b). Tattvasaṃgraha oyobi Tattvasaṃgrahapañjikā dai 21 shō “Sanjinokōsatsu” kōteitekisuto to wayaku (kk. 1785–1808) [A critical edition and an annotated Japanese translation of the 21st chapter (Traikālyaparīkṣā) of the Tattvasaṃgraha and Tattvasaṃgrahapañjikā thereon (pp. 1785–1808)]. Indogaku-chibettogaku-kenkyū, 19, 158–209.Google Scholar
  24. Shimizu, K. (1984). Inga wo meguru ronsō. TSP. “Karmaphalasambandhaparīkṣā” shiyaku [The controversy over cause and effect. The Japanese translation of the TSP, Karmaphalasambandha-parīkṣā]. Nanto Bukkyō, 52, 1–35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Intercultural Studies, Faculty of Cultural StudiesKyoto Sangyo UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations