Advertisement

Journal of Indian Philosophy

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 475–504 | Cite as

How Do We Understand the Meaning of a Sentence Under the Yogācāra Model of the Mind? On Disputes Among East Asian Yogācāra Thinkers of the Seventh Century

Article
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

Understanding the meaning of a sentence is crucial for Buddhists because they put so much emphasis on understanding the verbal expressions of the Buddha. But this can be problematic under their metaphysical framework of momentariness, and their epistemological framework of multiple consciousnesses. This paper starts by reviewing the theory of five states of mind in the Yogācārabhūmi, and then investigates debates among medieval East Asian Yogācāra thinkers about how various consciousnesses work together to understand the meaning of a sentence. The major differences between the various explanations proffered lie in the minimum number of types of consciousnesses involved, and the minimum linguistic marks (sound, syllable, term, sentence and meaning) cognized, in order for one to understand a sentence consisting of four Chinese characters. I show that in these disputes, two points are key: First, the role played by the mental consciousness that arises simultaneously with a sensory consciousness: that is to say, whether a sensory consciousness should still be regarded as essential for understanding, if the simultaneous mental consciousness also cognizes the same mark. Second, whether the syntactic structure of a sentence is taken into consideration: that is to say, whether there is a separate determination of understanding regarding each character, or there is no determination until one has heard two or more characters and takes them as a syntactically meaningful unit.

Keywords

Yogācāra Yogācārabhūmi Theory of Understanding the Meaning of a Sentence Kuiji 窺基 (632–682 CE) Wŏnch’ŭk 圓測 (613–696 CE) Huizhao 慧沼 (651–714 CE) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Academy of Korean Studies (KSPS) Grant funded by the Korean Government (MOE) (AKS-2012-AAZ-104) and by Taiwan’s Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 104-2410-H-004 -194 -MY2). My special thanks are due to Professor Jeson Woo for involving me in the very prestigious project. I thank Professor Michael Radich, who has very generously read an earlier draft of this paper, offered valuable suggestions and improved the English. I would also like to thank the anonymous reviewer for very useful advice.

References

Primary Sources

  1. T: Taishō shinshiu daizōkyō 大正新修大藏經. (Tōkyō: Daizōkyō kankō kai, 1924–1935).Google Scholar
  2. X: Shinsan Dai Nihon zoku zōkyō 新纂大日本續藏經 (Tōkyō: Kokusho kankō kai, 1975–1989)Google Scholar
  3. Bhattacharya, V. edited (1957). The Yogācārabhūmi of Ācārya Asaṅga: The Sanskrit Text compared with the Tibetan Version. Part 1. Calcutta: University of Calcutta.Google Scholar
  4. Rhys Davids, R. W., & Carpenter, J. E. (Eds.). (1995). The Dīgha Nikāya: Vol. II. London: Pāli Text Society.Google Scholar
  5. Pradhan, P. (1967). Abhidharmakośabhāṣya of Vasubandhu. Patna: K.P. Jayaswal Research Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Xuanzang 玄奘 (Tr.), Yujiashi dilun 瑜伽師地論, T1579 (XXX).Google Scholar
  7. Wŏnch’ŭk 圓測, Jieshenmi jing shu 解深密經疏, X369 (XXI).Google Scholar
  8. Kuiji 窺基, Cheng weishi lun shuji 成唯識論述記, T1830 (XLIII).Google Scholar
  9. Kuiji 窺基, Dasheng fayuan yilin zhang 大 乘 法 苑 義 林 章, T1861 (VL).Google Scholar
  10. Huizhao 慧沼, Cheng weishi lun liaoyi deng 成唯識論了義燈, T1832 (XLIII).Google Scholar
  11. Huilin 慧琳, Yiqie jing yin yi 一切經音義, T2128 (LIV).Google Scholar
  12. Zenjo 善珠, Yuishiki gitō zōmōki 唯識義燈増明記, T2261 (LXV).Google Scholar

Secondary References

  1. Chu, J. 褚俊傑 (forthcoming). Sthiramati and the thesis of mental awareness accompanying sensory awareness. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dhammajoti, K. L. (2007). Abhidharma doctrines and controversies on perception (3rd ed.). Hong Kong: Centre of Buddhist Studies, University of Hong Kong [First ed. 1997].Google Scholar
  3. Hattori, M. 服部正明 (1968). Dignāga, on perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hayashima, O. 早島理 (2003). Bonzōkan-taikō E-text Abhidharmasamuccaya and Abhidharmasamuccayabhāṣya 梵蔵漢対校 E-text Abhidharmasamuccaya and Abhidharmasamuccayabhāṣya. Shiga, Japan: Privately Published. http://www.shiga-med.ac.jp/public/yugagyo/. Accessed 27 February 2008.
  5. Kramer, J. (2013). Sthiramati’s Pañcaskandhakavibhāṣā. Beijing: China Tibetology Publishing House; Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kramer, J. (2016). Some remarks on the proofs of the “Store Mind” (Ālayavijñāna) and the development of the concept of Manas. In B. Dessein & W. Teng (Eds.), Text, philosophy, and history: Abhidharma across Buddhist Scholastic Traditions (pp. 146–166). Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Schmithausen, L. (1967). Sautrāntika-Voraussetzungen in Viṃśatikā und Triṃśikā. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd- und Ostasiens, 11, 109–136.Google Scholar
  8. Tani, T. 谷貞志 (2000). Setsuna metsu no kenkyū 剎那滅の研究. Tōkyō: Shunjūsha.Google Scholar
  9. Takatsukasa, Y. 高務祐輝 (2014). The problem of the simultaneous arising of six Vijñānas: In the Pañcavijñānakāyasaṃprayuktabhūmi and the Manobhūmi. 印度学仏教学研究 Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 62(3), 184–188(L).Google Scholar
  10. Takatsukasa, Y. 高務祐輝 (2016). The sequential arising of Vijñānas in the early Yogācāra and the Sarvāstivāda. 印度学仏教学研究 Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 64(3), 180–184(L).Google Scholar
  11. von Rospatt, A. (1995). The Buddhist Doctrine of momentariness: A survey of the origins and early phase of this doctrine up to Vasubandhu‬. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬Google Scholar
  12. Waldschmidt, E. (1950). Das Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra: Text in Sanskrit und Tibetisch, verglichen mit dem Pāli nebst einer .bersetzung der chinesischen Entsprechung im Vinaya der Mūlasarvāstivādins, auf Grund von Turfan-Handschriften herausgegeben und bearbeitet. Teil I: Der Sanskrit im handschriftlichen Befund. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Chengchi UniversityTaipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations