Skip to main content
Log in

The prajñāpāramitā in Relation to the Three Samādhis

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The idea that insight is by nature incompatible with concentration has been a long-term focus of scholarly discussion regarding the interpretation of some sūtra passages that could suggest the occurrence of insight within concentration. In the Prajñāpāramitā literature, the set of three samādhis (the concentrations of emptiness, signlessness and wishlessness) is identified with insight, the prajñāpāramitā. Some scholars identify the experience of emptiness in these samādhis with a state of concentration, very likely the absorption of extinction (nirodhasamāpatti). I highlight elsewhere a passage in the Prajñāpāramitā in which preceding vows play an important role in the practice of emptiness, that is, the prajñāpāramitā and may apply to the moment just before entering into the absorption of extinction. However, the problem of how the prajñāpāramitā is by nature incompatible with concentration could be practiced in the absorption of extinction remains. In the Sāgaramatiparipṛcchāsūtra there is a passage which illustrates the significance and effect of dedications preceding the practice of the three samādhis. According to this passage, the set of three samādhis is sometimes described as some very deep concentrations; at their emergence there could be two different attainments: either nirvāṇa or all-knowing accompanied by all qualities of the Buddha. This paper looks into the several steps immediately before the attainment of all-knowing by revealing a new usage of “dedications” in the Sāgaramatiparipṛcchāsūtra.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Primary Sources and Abbreviations

  • AKBh: Abhidharmakośabhāṣyam of Vasubandhu, ed. P Pradhan. Patna: K. P. Jayaswal Research Institute, 1975.

  • Aṣṭa: Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā. In Abhisamayālaṃkārālokā Prajñāpāramitāvyākhyā: The Work of Haribhadra Together with the Text Commented on, ed. by Unrai Wogihara. Tokyo: The Toyo Bunko, 1973.

  • BHSG: Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit Grammar and Dictionary, Vol. II, Franklin Edgerton. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1998.

  • Kv: Katthāvatthu, vols. I & II, ed. Arnold C. Taylor. London: Pali Text Society, 1979.

  • M: Majjhima-Nikāya, ed. Rhys Davids, contd. by Robert Chalmers, V. Trenckner. London: Pali Text Society, 1977–1979.

  • PVS IIIII: Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā II III, ed. Takayasu Kimura. Tokyo: Sankibo Busshorin Publishing Co., 1986.

  • PVS V: Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā V, ed. Takayasu Kimura. Tokyo: Sankibo Busshorin Publishing Co., 1992.

  • VisM: Buddhaghosācariya’s Visuddhimaggo with Paramatthamañjūsāṭīkā of Bhadantācariya Dhammapāla, 3 Vols, ed. by Badari Nāth Shukla, revised by Rewatadhamma. Varanasi: Varanaseya Sanskrit Vishwavidyalaya, 1969.

  • MVi: *Mahāvibhāṣā(śāstra)大毘婆沙論 trl. Xuanzang: T27.1545.

  • Peking: The Peking Edition of the Tibetan Tripitaka. Tokyo: Xizang Dazangjing Yanjiuhui, 1957.

  • S: Saṃyutta Nikāya (IV).

  • SWTF: Sanskrit-Wörterbuch der buddhistischen Texte aus den Turfan-Funden, ed. Heinz Bechert, Klaus Röhrborn. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1973ff.

  • T: The Taishō Edition of the Chinese Tripitaka (大正新修大藏經), Taipei: Xinwenfeng, 1983.

  • Vin: The Vinaya Piṭakaṃ: One of the Principal Buddhist Holy Scriptures in the Pāli Language. Ed. by Hermann Oldenberg. Oxford: Pali Text Society, 1993.

Secondary Sources

  • de Breet, J. A. (1992). The concept Upāyakauśalya in the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens, 36, 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronkhorst, J. (2000). The two traditions of meditation in Ancient India. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choong, Y. M. (2006). Zum Problem der Leerheit (śūnyatā) in der Prajñāpāramitā. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choong, Y. M. (2008). The pre-terminological expressions of Bodhicitta and their meanings in the first two chapters of the Prajñāpāramitā Sutras. Dharma Drum Journal of Buddhist Studies, 2, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choong, Y. M. (2013). Nirvāṇa and Tathatā in the early Yogācāra texts: The Bodhisattva’s adaptation of the Śrāvaka-Path. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 41(1), 49–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleanu, F. (2005). A preliminary study on meditation and the beginnings of Mahāyāna Buddhism. In P. Williams (Ed.), Buddhism: Critical concepts in religious studies (Vol. III, pp. 26–73). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauwallner, E. (2010). Die Philosophie des Buddhismus. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P. J. (1991). On being mindless: Buddhist meditation and the mind-body problem. Illinois: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mano, R. 真野龍海. (1992). Hannya Haramitta no Kenkyū 般若波羅密多の研究. Tōkyō: Sankibō Busshorin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagao, G. M. 長尾雅人. (1992). Usages and meanings of Pariṇāmanā. In L. S. Kawamura (Trl.), Mādhyamika and Yogācāra (pp. 83–90). Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.

  • Schmithausen, L. (1973). Spirituelle Praxis und Philosophische Theorie im Buddhismus. Zeitschrift für Missionswissenschaft und Religionswissenschaft, 57, 161–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmithausen, L. (1977). Textgeschichtliche Beobachtungen zum 1. Kapitel der Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā. In L. Lancaster (Ed.), Prajñāpāramitā and related systems: Studies in honor of Edward Conze (pp. 35–82). Berkeley: The University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmithausen, L. (1981). On some aspects of descriptions or theories of ‘liberating insight’ and ‘enlightenment’ in early Buddhism. In K. Bruhn & A. Wezler (Eds.), Studien zum Jainismus und Buddhismus (pp. 199–250). Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmithausen, L. (2000). Mitleid und Leerheit: Zu Spiritualität und Heilsziel des Mahāyāna. In Der Buddhismus als Anfrage an Christiliche Theologie und Philosophie. Mödling: Verlag St. Gabriel.

  • Vetter, T. (1984). A comparison between the mysticism of the older Prajñā-pāramitā literature and the mysticism of the Mūla-Madhyamaka-Kārikās of Nāgārjuna. Studies of Mysticism in Honour of the 1150th Anniversary of Kobo-Daishi’s Nirvāṇam. Acta Indologica, 6, 495–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetter, T. (2001). Once again on the origin of Mahāyāna Buddhism. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens, 45, 59–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, A. (2007). The origin of Buddhist meditation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoke Meei Choong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choong, Y.M. The prajñāpāramitā in Relation to the Three Samādhis. J Indian Philos 44, 727–756 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-015-9279-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-015-9279-2

Keywords

Navigation