Journal of Indian Philosophy

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 543–552 | Cite as

The Stanzas on the Cārvāka/Lokāyata in the Skhalitapramathanayuktihetusiddhi



In Āryadevapāda’s Skhalitapramathanayuktihetusiddhi we find a problematic passage in which some Cārvāka theories are expounded. The problem here lies in the fact that, according to Āryadevapāda, the Cārvākas—who did not admit rebirth—would have upheld that happiness in this life can be gained by worshipping gods and defeating demons. As the Cārvākas were materialists, the reference to gods and demons does not fit so much with their philosophical perspective. In this paper, by taking into account several passages from Pāli and Sanskrit Buddhist sources, I have tried to demonstrate that Āryadevapāda is here probably following the Laṅkāvatārasūtra, where mention is made of some Lokāyatikas who are said to have been able to infatuate gods and demons. In both the Pāli Canon and the Mahāyāna sūtras, however, the term lokāyata does not refer to “materialism”. It rather conveys the meaning of “art of disputation”, and is generally used in the description of brāhmaṇas well versed in the Vedas, in the recitation of mantras and in dialectic methods in general. It is the Laṅkāvatārasūtra that introduces the idea—corroborated also by a passage from the Mahābhārata—that these brāhmaṇas, skilled in lokāyata, would have indulged in some materialistic tenet. When the two terms, Cārvāka and Lokāyata, came both to mean “materialism”, around the IV century CE, it is highly probable that non-Cārvāka thinkers and commentators—as could be the case of Āryadevapāda—had in some occasion assimilated and integrated certain points of view, originally belonging to the ancient lokāyata perspective (for instance, the references to gods and demons), into what they believed Cārvāka philosophy had to be.


Cārvāka/Lokāyata Skhalitapramathanayuktihetusiddhi Pāli sources Mahāyāna sūtras Interpretation Āryadevapāda 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


(a) Primary Sources

  1. Aṅguttaranikāya: – Morris, R., Warder, A.K. (ed. by), The Aṅguttara-Nikāya vol. I, Pali Text Society, Oxford 1999 rep.Google Scholar
  2. Āryadevapāda, Jñānasārasamuccaya: – Ye śes sñin po kun las btus pa źes bya ba, in The Nyingma Edition of the sDe-dge bKa’-’gyur and bsTan-’gyur, Dharma Mudranālaya, Oakland (California) 1981, dBu-ma, vol. 199: TSHa, foll. 26b2–28a3.Google Scholar
  3. Āryadevapāda, Skhalitapramathanayuktihetusiddhi: – ‘KHrul pa bzlog pa’i rigs pa gtan tshigs grub pa, in The Nyingma Edition of the sDe-dge bKa’-’gyur and bsTan-’gyur, Dharma Mudranālaya, Oakland (California) 1981, dBu-ma, vol. 199: TSHa, foll. 19b1–22b1.Google Scholar
  4. Bhāviveka/Bhavya, Madhyamakaratnapradīpa: – dBu ma rin po che’i sgron ma, in The Nyingma Edition of the sDe-dge bKa’-’gyur and bsTan-’gyur, Dharma Mudranālaya, Oakland (California) 1981, dBu-ma, vol. 199: TSHa, foll. 259b–289a.Google Scholar
  5. Dīghanikāya: – Rhys Davids, T.W., Carpenter, J.E. (ed. by), The Dīgha Nikāya vol. I, Pali Text Society, Oxford 1992–1995 rep.Google Scholar
  6. Divyāvadānasūtra: – Vaidya, P.L. (ed. by), Divyāvadāna, Mithila Institute, Darbhanga 1959.Google Scholar
  7. Gaṇḍavyūhasūtra: – Vaidya, P.L. (ed. by), Gaṇḍavyūha Sūtram, Mithila Institute, Darbhanga 1960.Google Scholar
  8. ‘Gos lo ts’a ba, Deb ther sṅon po: – Roerich, G.N. (Engl. trans.), The Blue Annals (Parts I & II Bound in One), Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi 1995 rep.Google Scholar
  9. Kamalaśīla, Tattvasaṃgrahapañjikā: – Dwārikādās Śāstrī (ed. by), The Tattvasaṃgraha of Ācārya Śāntarakṣita with the “Pañ-jikā” Commentary of Ācārya Kamalaśīla (2 vols.), Bauddha Bharati, Varanasi 1968.Google Scholar
  10. Kamalaśīla, Tattvasaṃgrahapañjikā: – Jha, G. (Engl. trans.), The Tattvasaṅgraha of Shāntarakṣita with the Commentary of Kamalashīla (2 vols.), Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi 1986 rep.Google Scholar
  11. Kāśyapaparivartasūtra: – von Staël-Holstein, A. (ed. by), Kāśyapaparivartasūtra, a Mahāyānasūtra of the Ratnakūṭa Class, Commercial-Press, Shanghai 1926.Google Scholar
  12. Kāśyapaparivartasūtra – Virobyova-Desyatovskaya, M.I. (ed. by), The Kāśyapaparivarta. Romanized Text and Facsimiles, The International Research Institute for advanced Buddhology, Soka University, Tokyo 2002.Google Scholar
  13. Laṅkāvatārasūtra: – Nanjiō, B. (ed. by), The Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra, The Otani University Press, Kyōto 1923.Google Scholar
  14. Laṅkāvatārasūtra: – Suzuki, D.T. (Enlg. trans.), The Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra: A Mahāyāna Text, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi 1999.Google Scholar
  15. Mahābhārata: – Sukhtankar, V.S., et al. (ed. by), The Mahābhārata for the First Time Critically Edited, Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Poona 1919–1966.Google Scholar
  16. Majjhimanikāya: – Trenckner, V. (ed. by), The Majjhima-Nikāya vol. II, Pali Text Society, Oxford 1993 rep.Google Scholar
  17. Saddharmapuṇḍarīkasūtra: – Vaidya, P.L. (ed. by), Saddharmapuṇḍarīkasūtram, Mithila Institute, Darbhanga 1960.Google Scholar
  18. Suttanipāta: – Andersen, D., Smith, H. (ed. by), The Suttanipāta, Pali Text Society, Oxford 1990 rep.Google Scholar

(b) Secondary Sources

  1. Bhattacharya R. (2009) Studies on the Cārvāka/Lokāyata. Firenze, Società Editrice FiorentinaGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhattacharya, R. (unpublished paper). lokāyata and its derivatives in the Sad-dharma-puṇḍarīka-sūtra(permission to quote secured).Google Scholar
  3. Mimaki, K. (2008). Jñānasārasamuccaya kk° 20–28. Mise au point with a Sanskrit Manuscript. In J. A. Silk (Ed.), Buddhist studies: The legacy of Gadjin M. Nagao (pp. 233–244). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  4. Seyfort Ruegg, D. (1990). On the authorship of some works ascribed to Bhāvaviveka/Bhavya. In D. Seyfort Ruegg & L. Schmithausen (Eds.), Panels of the VIIth world sanskrit conference, Earliest Buddhism and Madhyamaka (Vol. II, pp, 59–71). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  5. Tucci G. (1936) Un traité d’Āryadeva sur le “nirvāṇa” des hérétiques. T’oung Pao 24: 16–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facoltà di Scienze della FormazioneUniversità di TriesteTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations