Mipam’s Middle Way Through Yogācāra and Prāsaṅgika
- 161 Downloads
In Tibet, the negative dialectics of Madhyamaka are typically identified with Candrakīrti’s interpretation of Nāgārjuna, and systematic epistemology is associated with Dharmakīrti. These two figures are also held to be authoritative commentators on a univocal doctrine of Buddhism. Despite Candrakīrti’s explicit criticism of Buddhist epistemologists in his Prasannapadā, Buddhists in Tibet have integrated the theories of Candrakīrti and Dharmakīrti in unique ways. Within this integration, there is a tension between the epistemological system-building on the one hand, and “deconstructive” negative dialectics on the other. The integration of an epistemological system within Madhyamaka is an important part of Mipam’s (’ju mi pham rgya mtsho, 1846–1912) philosophical edifice, and is an important part of understanding the place of Yogācāra in his tradition. This paper explores the way that Mipam preserves a meaningful Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika distinction while claiming both Yogācāra and Prāsaṅgika as legitimate expressions of Madhyamaka. Mipam represents Prāsaṅgika-Madhyamaka as a discourse that emphasizes what transcends conceptuality. As such, he portrays Prāsaṅgika as a radical discourse of denial. Since the mind cannot conceive the “content” of nonconceptual meditative equipoise, Prāsaṅgika, as the representative discourse of meditative equipoise, negates any formulation of that state. In contrast, he positions Yogācāra as a discourse that situates the nonconceptual within a systematic (conceptual) structure. Rather than a discourse that re-presents the nonconceptual by enacting it (like Prāsaṅgika), the discourse of Yogācāra represents the nonconceptual within an overarching system, a system (unlike Prāsaṅgika) that distinguishes between the conceptual and the nonconceptual.
KeywordsMadhyamaka Yogācāra Prāsaṅgika Mipam Buddhism
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bötrül. (bod sprul mdo sngags bstan pa’i nyi ma, 1898–1959). (1996). Ornament of Mañjughoṣa’s Viewpoint: An Explanation of the Words and Meanings of “Distinguishing the Views and Philosophies: A Torch of the Essential Points” (lta grub shan ’byed gnad kyi sgron me’i tshig don rnam bshad ’jam dbyangs dgongs rgyan). Published in Distinguishing the Views and Philosophies: Root Text and Commentary (lta grub shan ’byed gnad kyi sgron me’i rtsa ’grel). Sichuan: Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
- Bötrül. (2011). Distinguishing the views and philosophies: Illuminating emptiness in a twentieth-century Tibetan Buddhist Classic (D. Duckworth, Trans.). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Doctor, T. (Trans.). (2004). Speech of delight: Mipham’s commentary on Śāntarakṣita’s Ornament of the Middle Way. Ithaca: Snow Lion Publications.Google Scholar
- Duckworth D. (2008) Mipam on Buddha-nature. SUNY Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
- Mipam. (1987). A Feast on the Nectar of the Supreme Vehicle: Commentary on the Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra (theg pa chen po mdo sde’i rgyan gyi dgongs don rnam par bshad pa theg mchog bdud rtsi’i dga’ ston). (’ju mi pham rgya mtsho, 1846–1912). Collected works (Dilgo Khyentsi’s expanded reduction of sde dge edition) (Vol. 2(a), pp. 1–760). Kathmandu: Zhechen Monastry.Google Scholar
- Mipam. (1990a). Eliminating Doubts (dam chos dogs sel). Published in dbu ma rgyan rtsa ’grel, 498–563. Sichuan: Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
- Mipam. (1990b). Words That Delight Guru Mañjughoṣa: Commentary on the Madhyamakālaṃkāra (dbu ma rgyan gyi rnam bshad ’jam byangs bla ma dgyes pa’i zhal lung). Published in dbu ma rgyan rtsa ’grel. Sichuan: Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
- Mipam. D. (1993a) Commentary on the Wisdom Chapter of the Bodhicaryāvatāra (spyod ’jug sher ’grel ke ta ka). Nationalities Press, SichuanGoogle Scholar
- Mipam. (1993b). Light of the Sun (brgal lan nyin byed snang ba). Published in spyod ’jug sher ’grel ke ta ka, 465–579. Sichuan: Nationalities Press.Google Scholar